HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text MPEG movies All Versions of this Article: e16v1 23/6/E16    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Ooijen, P. M. A. Articles by Oudkerk, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Ooijen, P. M. A. Articles by Oudkerk, M.

Coronary Artery Imaging with Multidetector CT: Visualization Issues¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Groningen University Hospital, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. Presented as an educational exhibit at the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 7, 2003, revision requested May 5, final revision received and accepted June 20. Address correspondence to P.M.A.v.O. (e-mail: p.m.a.van.ooyen@rad.azg.nl).

Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries has attracted growing interest in the past few years. One of the possible acquisition techniques is multidetector computed tomography (CT) that produces large three-dimensional (3D) data sets that require visualization techniques for data evaluation. The objective of this article is to increase knowledge of possible 3D visualization techniques together with their advantages and disadvantages for the routine evaluation of cardiac data sets. Common imaging techniques available to the radiologist at standard workstations are multiplanar reformation (MPR), oblique MPR, curved MPR, maximum-intensity projection (MIP), shaded-surface display, and direct volume rendering. Each of these techniques has its advantages and disadvantages for the visualization of the coronary artery tree. Several additions to the basic techniques have been developed to overcome some of their shortcomings. Different clinical examinations, such as stent evaluation, stenosis evaluation, and bypass evaluation, require different visualization techniques. The choice of preferred technique for each clinical study depends on the advantages and disadvantages of the various techniques as described in the literature. Because of the large number of possible settings and projection angles, it is important for users to interactively manipulate the images and review the whole vessel volume rather than just looking at static reformatted images. Errors such as findings of false stenoses can be avoided by means of accurate and appropriate use of software features. This requires training of users both with regard to the capabilities of the software and the background of the different techniques and their possible pitfalls. The authors believe that volume rendering of the whole heart is useful for anatomic evaluation of the coronary arteries. For more detailed observation of specific lesions, slab imaging with volume rendering or MIP is required.

© RSNA, 2003

Index Terms: Computed tomography (CT), angiography, 51.12116 • Compted tomography (CT), multi-detector row, 54.12115 • Computed tomography (CT), three-dimensional, 54.12117 • Coronary vessels, CT, 54.12115, 54.12117 • Heart, CT, 51.12116, 51.12117

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. T. Boll, A. S. Bossert, A. J. Aschoff, M. H. Hoffmann, and R. C. Gilkeson Synergy of MDCT and Cine MRI for the Evaluation of Cardiac Motility Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S379 - S386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. K. Fishman, D. R. Ney, D. G. Heath, F. M. Corl, K. M. Horton, and P. T. Johnson Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why. RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 905 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Nakanishi, Y. Kayashima, R. Inoue, K. Sumii, and Y. Gomyo Pitfalls in 16-Detector Row CT of the Coronary Arteries RadioGraphics, March 1, 2005; 25(2): 425 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]