|
|
||||||||
RadioGraphics, Vol 18, 1587-1598, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America
REVIEWS |
JW Byng, MJ Yaffe, RA Jong, RS Shumak, GA Lockwood, DL Tritchler and NF Boyd
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
To evaluate the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk, a simple, observer-assisted technique called interactive thresholding was developed that allows reliable quantitative assessment of mammographic density with use of a computer workstation. Use of this technique helps confirm that mammographic density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer and is present in a large proportion of breast cancer cases. The strong relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer risk suggests that the causes of breast cancer may be better understood by identifying the factors associated with mammographically dense tissue and determining how such tissue changes as these factors vary. Furthermore, because it can be modified, mammographic density may also be a good vehicle for the development and monitoring of potential preventive strategies. Areas of ongoing investigation include evaluating a potential genetic component of mammographic density by comparing density measurements in twins and understanding changes in density relative to age, menopausal status, exogenous hormone use, and exposure to environmental carcinogens. In addition, work is ongoing to establish measurements from imaging modalities other than mammography and to relate these measurements directly to breast cancer risk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. J. Heine, M. J. Carston, C. G. Scott, K. R. Brandt, F.-F. Wu, V. S. Pankratz, T. A. Sellers, and C. M. Vachon An Automated Approach for Estimation of Breast Density Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2008; 17(11): 3090 - 3097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Khazen, R. M.L. Warren, C. R.M. Boggis, E. C. Bryant, S. Reed, I. Warsi, L. J. Pointon, G. E. Kwan-Lim, D. Thompson, R. Eeles, et al. A Pilot Study of Compositional Analysis of the Breast and Estimation of Breast Mammographic Density Using Three-Dimensional T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 2268 - 2274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ding, R. Warren, I. Warsi, N. Day, D. Thompson, M. Brady, C. Tromans, R. Highnam, and D. Easton Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using Standard Mammogram Form to Predict Breast Cancer Risk: Case-Control Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1074 - 1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Kelemen, V. S. Pankratz, T. A. Sellers, K. R. Brandt, A. Wang, C. Janney, Z. S. Fredericksen, J. R. Cerhan, and C. M. Vachon Age-specific Trends in Mammographic Density: The Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2008; 167(9): 1027 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Fuhrman, B. E. Teter, M. Barba, C. Byrne, A. Cavalleri, B. J. Grant, P. J. Horvath, D. Morelli, E. Venturelli, and P. C. Muti Equol Status Modifies the Association of Soy Intake and Mammographic Density in a Sample of Postmenopausal Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 33 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sellers, C. Vachon, V. Pankratz, C. Janney, Z Fredericksen, K. Brandt, Y Huang, F. Couch, L. Kushi, and J. Cerhan Association of Childhood and Adolescent Anthropometric Factors, Physical Activity, and Diet with Adult Mammographic Breast Density Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2007; 166(4): 456 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Stone, G. S. Dite, A. Gunasekara, D. R. English, M. R.E McCredie, G. G. Giles, J. N. Cawson, R. A. Hegele, A. M. Chiarelli, M. J. Yaffe, et al. The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 612 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Dite, J. D. Wark, G. G. Giles, D. R. English, M. R.E. McCredie, and J. L. Hopper Is There Overlap Between the Genetic Determinants of Mammographic Density and Bone Mineral Density? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2266 - 2268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Cerhan, T. A. Sellers, C. A. Janney, V. S. Pankratz, K. R. Brandt, and C. M. Vachon Prenatal and Perinatal Correlates of Adult Mammographic Breast Density Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1502 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cuzick, J. Warwick, E. Pinney, R. M. L. Warren, and S. W. Duffy Tamoxifen and Breast Density in Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, April 21, 2004; 96(8): 621 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Jamal, K.-H. Ng, D. McLean, L.-M. Looi, and F. Moosa Mammographic Breast Glandularity in Malaysian Women: Data Derived from Radiography Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 713 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Vachon, T. A. Sellers, V. S. Pankratz, F. M. Hall, N. F. Boyd, J. L. Hopper, and E. Thurfjell Mammographic Density of the Breast N. Engl. J. Med., January 9, 2003; 348(2): 174 - 175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. F. Boyd, G. S. Dite, J. Stone, A. Gunasekara, D. R. English, M. R.E. McCredie, G. G. Giles, D. Tritchler, A. Chiarelli, M. J. Yaffe, et al. Heritability of Mammographic Density, a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., September 19, 2002; 347(12): 886 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. M. Hall, L. A. Venta, and R. E. Hendrick Mammographic Density Categories Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2002; 178(1): 242 - 243. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Freedman, J. S. Martin, J. O'Gorman, S. Eckert, M. E. Lippman, S.-C. B. Lo, E. L. Walls, and J. Zeng Digitized Mammography: a Clinical Trial of Postmenopausal Women Randomly Assigned to Receive Raloxifene, Estrogen, or Placebo J Natl Cancer Inst, January 3, 2001; 93(1): 51 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yoshidome, M.-A. Shibata, C. Couldrey, K. S. Korach, and J. E. Green Estrogen Promotes Mammary Tumor Development in C3(1)/SV40 Large T-Antigen Transgenic Mice: Paradoxical Loss of Estrogen Receptor{{alpha}} Expression during Tumor Progression Cancer Res., December 1, 2000; 60(24): 6901 - 6910. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Chow, D. Venzon, E. C. Jones, A. Premkumar, J. OShaughnessy, and J. Zujewski Effect of Tamoxifen on Mammographic Density Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 917 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Friedenreich, H. Bryant, F Alexander, J Hugh, J Danyluk, and D. Page Risk factors for benign proliferative breast disease Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2000; 29(4): 637 - 644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |