RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Erratum for Pickhardt et al., Radiographics 23 (3) 645-662.
Erratum for Nishino et al., Radiographics 23 (1) 45-57.
Erratum for Kim et al. 22 (Supplement 1): S151.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
(Radiographics. 2003;23:1340.)
© RSNA, 2003

Errata

"Interstitial Lung Diseases Associated with Collagen Vascular Diseases: Radiologic and Histopathologic Findings"

RadioGraphics 2002; 22:S151–S165.

Page S155: The caption labeled Figure 3 should be labeled Figure 4 and describes the image shown at the bottom of the page. The caption labeled Figure 4 should be labeled Figure 3 and describes the image shown in the center of the page.

"Primary Retroperitoneal Neoplasms: CT and MR Imaging Findings with Anatomic and Pathologic Diagnostic Clues"

RadioGraphics 2003; 23:45–57.

Page 47, column 2, sentence 5: The sentence should read as follows: "In contrast, when part of an organ appears to be embedded in the tumor (positive [not negative] embedded organ sign) (Fig 5b, 5c), the tumor is in close contact with the organ and the contact surface is typically sclerotic with desmoplastic reaction."

Page 49, column 2, sentence 3: The sentence should read as follows: "The presence of fat is easily recognized owing to its low [not high] attenuation at CT or its high signal intensity at T1-weighted MR imaging with loss of signal intensity on fat-suppressed images."

"Primary Neoplasms of the Appendix: Radiologic Spectrum of Disease with Pathologic Correlation"

RadioGraphics 2003; 23:645–662.

Page 648, sentences 3 and 4: The sentences should read as follows: "Analogous findings are seen at endoscopy, but, as with contrast enema examination, the overall size and morphologic features cannot be assessed (Fig 2a–2c) [not 3a–3c]. Cross-sectional imaging (CT, ultrasonography [US], or magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) is useful for evaluating the full extent of the lesion in this setting (Fig 2d) [not 3d]."





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE