RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)
Terms and Conditions for Use


Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 2


View larger version (155K)


Figure 2d.  Malignant features. (a) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated GRE (20/4.5; flip angle, 30°) image shows two masses in the left breast of a 44-year-old woman, one with thin rimlike enhancement at the 4-o’clock position (arrowhead) and the other with heterogeneous enhancement and enhanced internal septa at the 2-o’clock position (arrow). (b) T2-weighted (4000/90) fat-saturated image (same patient as in a) shows low signal intensity in the portions of the masses that appeared enhanced in a. A central region of necrosis in the mass at the 4-o’clock position shows increased internal T2-weighted signal intensity. The masses proved to be poorly differentiated ductal carcinoma with necrosis and signet ring cell features. (c) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted GRE (20/4.5; flip angle, 30°) subtraction image from a 42-year-old woman shows a spiculated margin in an infiltrating carcinoma with ductal and lobular features. (d) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated GRE (20/4.5; flip angle, 30°) image from a 52-year-old woman shows a retroareolar mass (arrow) with an irregular margin and heterogeneous enhancement. The results of histologic analysis indicated infiltrating ductal carcinoma. (e) T2-weighted (4000/90) fat-saturated image (same patient as in d) shows the mass (arrow) with low signal intensity. Note the focal skin thickening and nipple retraction.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE