RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.234025149
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheema, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Harcke, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheema, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Harcke, H. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Musculoskeletal Radiology
Right arrow Pediatric Radiology
(Radiographics. 2003;23:871-880.)
© RSNA, 2003


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Radiographic Characteristics of Lower-Extremity Bowing in Children1

Jugesh I. Cheema, MD, Leslie E. Grissom, MD and H. Theodore Harcke, MD

1 From the Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Del (J.I.C.), and the Department of Medical Imaging, Nemours Children’s Clinic-Wilmington, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, 1600 Rockland Rd, Wilmington, DE 19803 (L.E.G., H.T.H.). Presented as an education exhibit at the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received September 27, 2002; revision requested December 13 and received January 28, 2003; accepted January 28. Address correspondence to L.E.G. (e-mail: lgrissom@nemours.org).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Causes of Lower-Extremity Bowing
 Surgical Correction of Bowing
 Conclusions
 References
 
Lower-extremity bowing is common in infants and children and can result from a variety of conditions. At radiography, developmental bowing shows varus angulation centered at the knee, "metaphyseal beaking," thickening of the medial tibial cortices, and tilted ankle joints. Tibia vara (Blount disease) demonstrates genu varum and depression of the proximal tibia medially. Congenital bowing manifests as posteromedial bowing with cortical thickening along the concavity of the curvature and, in some cases, diaphyseal broadening. In rickets, radiographic changes occur primarily at sites of rapid growth and are predominantly metaphyseal, with widening of the zone of provisional calcification. Achondroplasia is characterized by shortening and thickening of the long bones with metaphyseal flaring and cupping. In neurofibromatosis, there may be anterolateral bowing of the tibia, and there is often focal narrowing and intramedullary sclerosis or cystic change at the apex of the angulation. The tibia is typically involved at the junction of the middle and distal thirds. Osteogenesis imperfecta demonstrates bowing from softening due to osteoporosis and multiple fractures and typically involves the entire skeleton. In camptomelic dysplasia, lower-extremity bowing is associated with a short trunk, short limbs, and deficiencies in pelvic bone development. Recognition of these pathologic conditions is important for differentiating those that will resolve spontaneously from those that require surgery or other treatment.

© RSNA, 2003

Index Terms: Bones, growth and development • Bones, osteochondrodysplasias, 45.1521 • Knee, abnormalities, 45.135, 45.145, 45.1481, 45.1521, 45.1551, 45.1624, 45.1831 • Neurofibromatosis, 45.1831


    LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST 3
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Causes of Lower-Extremity Bowing
 Surgical Correction of Bowing
 Conclusions
 References
 
After reading this article and taking the test, the reader will be able to:


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Causes of Lower-Extremity Bowing
 Surgical Correction of Bowing
 Conclusions
 References
 
Bowing of the lower extremities is common and is a frequent cause of orthopedic referral (1). The parents of children with bowlegs often want to know if the legs are abnormal. The role of the physician is to determine if the bowing is physiologic or pathologic. In this article, we discuss and illustrate the clinical and radiographic characteristics of various common and uncommon causes of lower-extremity bowing in children, including developmental bowing, congenital bowing, tibia vara (Blount disease) (Figs 1, 2), neurofibromatosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, rickets, camptomelic dysplasia, and achondroplasia.



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1.  Photograph shows a 21/2-year-old girl with infantile Blount disease.

 


View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2.  Photograph shows an 11-year-old boy with adolescent Blount disease.

 

    Causes of Lower-Extremity Bowing
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Causes of Lower-Extremity Bowing
 Surgical Correction of Bowing
 Conclusions
 References
 
Developmental ("Physiologic") Bowing
Developmental (physiologic) bowing is a common condition that causes exaggeration of normal age-related angulation changes at the knee joint. Neonates and infants normally have varus angulation of the lower extremities that is believed to be secondary to in utero molding. Gradual correction of this angulation begins as a child starts walking. The bowing is corrected within 6 months of walking or by 18–24 months of age. After this age, there is normally a change to valgus angulation during the 2nd and 3rd years of life that reverts to the adult pattern by age 6 or 7 years (Fig 3). Thus, any varus angulation at the knee joint after the age of 2 years is abnormal.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3.  Graph illustrates how normal varus angulation before 2 years of age changes to valgus angulation after 2 years of age (arrow). (Reprinted, with permission, from reference 2.)

 
Exaggerated varus angulation during the 2nd year of life is deemed to be developmental (physiologic) bowing. This condition is typically seen in children who begin walking at an early age and is more common in heavier children as well as in African-American children (1,3). Radiography of developmental bowing shows varus angulation centered at the knee, which is measured by drawing lines parallel to the midshafts of the femur and tibia on a standing anteroposterior radiograph and calculating the angle of intersection. There is mild enlargement and depression of the proximal tibial metaphyses posteromedially without fragmentation ("metaphyseal beaking"). The medial tibial cortices are thickened secondary to buttressing, and the ankle joints are tilted with the medial side higher (Fig 4). Similar but less striking changes may be seen in the femurs (3). Developmental bowing does not require treatment, but follow-up is needed to ensure that the bowing resolves and that tibia vara does not develop.



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a.  Physiologic bowing in a 16-month-old boy. (a) Initial radiograph demonstrates physiologic bowing. (b) Follow-up radiograph obtained 7 months later shows mild metaphyseal beaking with improvement over time.

 


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b.  Physiologic bowing in a 16-month-old boy. (a) Initial radiograph demonstrates physiologic bowing. (b) Follow-up radiograph obtained 7 months later shows mild metaphyseal beaking with improvement over time.

 
Congenital Bowing
Congenital bowing of the tibia is an unusual condition that is believed to result from an abnormal intrauterine position, although localized skeletal dysplasia or fetal vascular insufficiency may also play a role in some cases. This type of tibial bowing is usually convex posteriorly and medially (Fig 5); less commonly, it is convex laterally. The fibula is also bowed. The foot shows marked dorsiflexion at birth. At radiography, there is cortical thickening along the concavity of the curvature, and there may be diaphyseal broadening. There is a good prognosis for remodeling during growth, but protective bracing may be necessary in some cases. Leg-length discrepancy secondary and directly proportional to bowing of the tibial-fibular segment is usually seen (4,5) and may require osteotomies and leg-lengthening procedures. Epiphysiodesis of the contralateral side may also be performed.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5.  Congenital bowing in a 3-month-old girl. Anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) radiographs demonstrate congenital bowing posteriorly and medially.

 
Tibia Vara (Blount Disease)
Tibia vara, or Blount disease, is a common condition that is believed to result from abnormal stress on the posteromedial proximal tibial physis, causing growth suppression. The growth at the epiphysis becomes asymmetric, leading to the typical varus angulation. Predisposing factors for this disease are early walking, obesity, and African-American descent. Obesity and early walking exaggerate the physiologic varus angulation. African-American children are believed to have excessive ligamentous laxity and begin to walk earlier than their Caucasian counterparts. Early diagnosis and treatment of this disease is vital to avoid progressive worsening.

Three major types of tibia vara have been recognized, depending on age at presentation: infantile, juvenile, and adolescent. Infantile type tibia vara is the most common. The later-onset types may represent an unrecognized or untreated variant of the infantile form (1).

Tibia vara is best diagnosed with standing anteroposterior radiography of both legs. The radiographs will demonstrate genu varum, measured as described earlier, and abnormality of the proximal tibia consisting of depression and irregularity or fragmentation of the metaphysis posteromedially and deficiency of the epiphysis medially. The physis may be widened medially due to arrested growth or laterally due to traction injury. More advanced cases will show lateral subluxation of the tibia, and genu recurvatum may also be seen.

Whereas developmental bowing is typically symmetric, Blount disease is usually unilateral or asymmetric. Measurement of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle has been used to more accurately diagnose this condition and to differentiate it from developmental bowing (Fig 6). The metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle is the angle between a line drawn parallel to the top of the proximal tibial metaphysis and another line drawn perpendicular to the long axis of the tibial shaft. In physiologic bowing, this angle is 5° ± 2.8 (range, 0°–11°). In Blount disease, the angle is 16° ± 4.3 (range, 8°–22°). It has been suggested that children with angles greater than 11° have Blount disease (Table). Children with indeterminate angles (8°–11°) may require follow-up radiography to clarify the diagnosis (6).



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6a.  Infantile Blount disease in a 23-month-old boy. (a) Radiograph shows asymmetric depression of the proximal tibial metaphyses, particularly on the affected left side. (b) Radiograph obtained 7 months later demonstrates increased metaphyseal depression bilaterally and fragmentation of the medial tibial metaphysis on the left side. Black lines illustrate abnormally increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal angles measuring 13° and 26° on the right and left sides, respectively.

 


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6b.  Infantile Blount disease in a 23-month-old boy. (a) Radiograph shows asymmetric depression of the proximal tibial metaphyses, particularly on the affected left side. (b) Radiograph obtained 7 months later demonstrates increased metaphyseal depression bilaterally and fragmentation of the medial tibial metaphysis on the left side. Black lines illustrate abnormally increased metaphyseal-diaphyseal angles measuring 13° and 26° on the right and left sides, respectively.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal Angle Measurements for Physiologic Bowing and Tibia Vara

 
A six-stage classification system for Blount disease, first proposed by Langenskiold in 1952, is still the system most commonly used by orthopedic surgeons (Fig 7). Langenskiold himself cautioned that this classification system was not intended to help determine prognosis or treatment. However, surgery consisting of osteotomies of the tibia and fibula is the usual treatment of choice in stage 3 disease or higher (7). Bowing can recur postoperatively, requiring repeat surgery. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (Fig 8) has been performed to evaluate the growth plate in Blount disease and may be useful in surgical planning (8,9). It may also be used to predict development of Blount disease in patients with severe physiologic bowing (10).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7.  Drawings illustrate the six stages of the Langenskiold classification system for Blount disease. Note the progressive depression, beaking, and fragmentation of the medial tibial metaphysis, also involving the epiphysis in the higher stages. (Reprinted, with permission, from reference 7.)

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8a.  Adolescent Blount disease in a 12-year-old boy. (a) Radiograph shows metaphyseal changes in both the proximal tibia and the distal femur. Physeal widening is noted in the proximal tibia medially (arrow). (b) T1-weighted MR images show abnormal metaphyseal signal intensity in the distal femur and proximal tibia (arrowheads).

 


View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8b.  Adolescent Blount disease in a 12-year-old boy. (a) Radiograph shows metaphyseal changes in both the proximal tibia and the distal femur. Physeal widening is noted in the proximal tibia medially (arrow). (b) T1-weighted MR images show abnormal metaphyseal signal intensity in the distal femur and proximal tibia (arrowheads).

 
Neurofibromatosis
Neurofibromatosis is a common genetic disorder. In addition to cutaneous, nervous system, and ocular abnormalities, osseous lesions are seen in neurofibromatosis type 1. These osseous lesions affect the skull, spine, ribs, pelvis, and long bones. There may be anterolateral bowing of the tibia with or without a hypoplastic fibula, and there is often focal narrowing and intramedullary sclerosis or cystic change at the apex of the angulation, a finding that is consistent with hamartomatous fibrous tissue. The tibia is typically involved at the junction of the middle and distal thirds (Fig 9). The underlying mechanism is mesodermal dysplasia. Pathologic fracture with nonunion may result in pseudarthrosis of the tibia and sometimes of the fibula, with pencil pointing of the bone fragments. When dysplasia without fracture is diagnosed, prophylactic bracing may be used to prevent development of pseudarthrosis. Once fracture has occurred, treatment consists of osteotomy with grafting with the goal of achieving union (11). The precise mechanism for defective healing and pseudarthrosis is not known. Distal to the pseudarthrosis, disuse osteoporosis and secondary deformities of the talus and calcaneus are seen. Aberrations in limb growth can also be seen in neurofibromatosis (12,13).



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9a.  Neurofibromatosis in a 1-year-old girl. Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs demonstrate bowing with focal sclerosis and a notched medial cortex in the distal third of the tibia.

 


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9b.  Neurofibromatosis in a 1-year-old girl. Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs demonstrate bowing with focal sclerosis and a notched medial cortex in the distal third of the tibia.

 
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Osteogenesis imperfecta is one of the more common heritable disorders of the connective tissue. Traditionally, four major types of osteogenesis imperfecta have been described, each with a different mode of inheritance depending on the basis of the specific collagen defect. Type 1 is characterized by fractures of varying severity, blue sclerae, abnormal tooth development, and wormian bones in the skull. Type 1 osteogenesis imperfecta comprises most of the cases previously classified as osteogenesis imperfecta tarda. Types 2 and 3 are characterized by severe skeletal involvement and poor postnatal survival rates. These cases may correspond to the cases previously classified as osteogenesis congenita. Patients with type 2 or 3 have blue sclerae and fractures at birth or even in utero. Type 4 exhibits normal sclerae and variable skeletal findings. With advances in genetics, many specialists now believe that this classification system is too narrow and misleading and that osteogenesis imperfecta is actually a more complex abnormality that is more accurately characterized in terms of clinical findings. In all four types of osteogenesis imperfecta, bowing of the long bones results from softening caused by osteoporosis and multiple fractures. Bowing typically involves all the long bones (Fig 10) (14), and osteotomies and pinning are commonly performed for bowing. Recently, some success has been achieved with medical treatment with bisphosphonates (15). However, although the density of the bones increases and clinical improvement is seen, fractures continue to occur (16).



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 10.  Osteogenesis imperfecta in a 7-year-old girl. Anteroposterior (left) and lateral (right) radiographs demonstrate marked osteopenia, anterior and medial bowing, and focal sclerosis in the midshaft of the tibia due to prior fracture. Note also the thin, bowed fibula and posttraumatic changes in the distal femoral metaphysis.

 
Rickets
Rickets results from deficient mineralization of normal osteoid and interruption of the normal orderly development and mineralization of growth plates. Vitamin D–resistant (hypophosphatemic) and nutritional rickets are the most common types. The bones are soft, with consequent bowing of long bones on weight bearing. However, the predominant changes are metaphyseal, with widening of the zone of provisional calcification due to the presence of unmineralized osteoid. Cupping, fraying, and splaying of metaphyses occurs with growth and continued weight bearing.

Radiologic changes in rickets occur predominantly at sites of rapid growth, including the proximal humerus, distal radius, and distal femur and both ends of the tibia. Thus, a skeletal survey for rickets can be accomplished with anteroposterior radiography of the knees, wrists, and ankles. The radiologic appearance of rickets varies somewhat depending on the cause of the disease. For example, in renal rickets, the metaphyseal changes are usually less severe, varying with the growth rate of the child (Fig 11). Renal rickets is usually seen in older children, whereas nutritional rickets is more common in infants (1719). Treatment is dietary and medical unless the bowing is severe, in which case valgus osteotomies may be performed.



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 11.  Vitamin D-resistant rickets in a 2-year-old girl. Radiograph shows metaphyseal changes and physeal widening.

 
Camptomelic Dysplasia
Camptomelic dysplasia is a rare inherited disorder that is often fatal in infancy. In newborns, it leads to a large head, a short trunk, and short, bowed limbs. There is angular anterolateral bowing of the limbs that is most marked in the legs, as well as involvement of both femurs and tibias (Fig 12). The hips are frequently dislocated. Clubbed feet and joint contractures may be seen. There is bowing of the forearm bones with small hands. The pelvis will show absence of sacral alae, narrow iliac bones, acetabular hypoplasia, and poor pubic ossification as well as widely separated, short ischial bones. The chest is bell shaped with thin, wavy ribs and slender clavicles. The tracheal caliber is narrow owing to defective tracheobronchial cartilage, and characteristic vertebral anomalies are present. Camptomelic dysplasia is classified as a bent-bone dysplasia (20). Treatment is usually supportive.



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 12a.  Camptomelic dysplasia in a 5-month-old girl. Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs demonstrate thickened, dysmorphic long bones and bowing of both tibias and femurs.

 


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 12b.  Camptomelic dysplasia in a 5-month-old girl. Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs demonstrate thickened, dysmorphic long bones and bowing of both tibias and femurs.

 
Achondroplasia
Achondroplasia is the most common form of short-limbed dwarfism. It is most often autosomal dominant in transmission but with a high rate of spontaneous mutation. Achondroplasia is characterized by shortening and thickening of the long bones with metaphyseal flaring and cupping. The lower extremities are bowed, and treatment of severe bowing requires valgus osteotomies. The phalanges are short, broad, and cupped. The iliac bones are short and rectangular with narrow sacrosciatic notches and short, wide pubic and ischial bones (Fig 13). There are bullet-shaped vertebral bodies with posterior scalloping and narrowing of lumbar interpedicular distances. The intervertebral disks are widened, resulting in normal trunk length, and the thorax is slender due to the short ribs with flared anterior ends. The head is large, with frontal bossing and a depressed nasal bridge (1).



View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 13.  Achondroplasia in a 6-year-old boy. Radiograph shows short bones, metaphyseal flaring, and genu varum. The acetabula are squared, and the sacrosciatic notches are narrowed.

 

    Surgical Correction of Bowing
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Causes of Lower-Extremity Bowing
 Surgical Correction of Bowing
 Conclusions
 References
 
Surgical treatment of bowing depends on the age of the patient and the cause and stage of the condition (21). The goal of treatment is restoration of satisfactory mechanical alignment. Osteotomies are often performed for Blount disease (Figs 14, 15), achondroplasia, vitamin D–resistant rickets, and osteogenesis imperfecta. When reviewing postoperative studies, the radiologist should look for recurrence of bowing, which can be varus or valgus in direction. Subsequent asymmetric growth plate closure can also affect surgical results.



View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14a.  Blount disease in a 3-year-old girl who was treated with proximal tibial osteotomies. (a) Preoperative radiograph demonstrates bilateral metaphyseal deformity and marked left-sided metaphyseal depression and varus angulation. (b) Radiograph obtained 5 months after surgery shows improved angulation.

 


View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14b.  Blount disease in a 3-year-old girl who was treated with proximal tibial osteotomies. (a) Preoperative radiograph demonstrates bilateral metaphyseal deformity and marked left-sided metaphyseal depression and varus angulation. (b) Radiograph obtained 5 months after surgery shows improved angulation.

 


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 15a.  Adolescent Blount disease in a 12-year-old boy who was treated with tibial and fibular osteotomies. (a) Preoperative radiograph shows varus angulation and tibial metaphyseal depression. (b) On a radiograph obtained 2 years after surgery, these conditions have improved but have not been completely corrected.

 


View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 15b.  Adolescent Blount disease in a 12-year-old boy who was treated with tibial and fibular osteotomies. (a) Preoperative radiograph shows varus angulation and tibial metaphyseal depression. (b) On a radiograph obtained 2 years after surgery, these conditions have improved but have not been completely corrected.

 

    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Causes of Lower-Extremity Bowing
 Surgical Correction of Bowing
 Conclusions
 References
 
Bowing of the lower extremities is present in a wide variety of pathologic conditions. Recognition of these conditions is important for differentiating those that will resolve spontaneously from those that require surgery or other treatment.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Causes of Lower-Extremity Bowing
 Surgical Correction of Bowing
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Tolo VT. The lower extremity. In: Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL, eds. Lovell and Winter’s pediatric orthopaedics. Vol II. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1996; 1047-1075.
  2. Salenius P, Vankka E. The development of the tibiofemoral angle in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975; 57:259-261.[Free Full Text]
  3. Ozonoff MB. Pediatric orthopaedic radiology Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1992.
  4. Caffey J. Prenatal bowing and thickening of tubular bones, with multiple cutaneous dimples in arms and legs. Am J Dis Child 1947; 74:543-562.
  5. Hofmann A, Wenger DR. Posteromedial bowing of the tibia: progression of discrepancy in leg lengths. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63:384-388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Levine AM, Drennan JC. Physiological bowing and tibia vara: the metaphyseal-diaphyseal angle in the measurement of bowleg deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64:1158-1163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Langenskiold A. Tibia vara: a critical review. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1989; 246:195-207.
  8. Synder M, Harcke HT, Conard K, Bowen JR. Experimental epiphysiodesis: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation with histopathologic correlation. Int Orthop 2001; 25:337-342.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Craig JG, van Holsbeeck M, Zaltz I. The utility of MR in assessing Blount disease. Skeletal Radiol 2002; 31:208-213.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Iwasawa T, Inaba Y, Nishimura G, Aida N, Kameshita K, Matsubara S. MR findings of bowlegs in toddlers. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 29:826-834.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Sponseller PD. Localized disorders of bone and soft tissue. In: Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL, eds. Lovell and Winter’s pediatric orthopaedics. Vol II. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1996; 305-344.
  12. Hefti F, Bollini G, Dungl P, et al. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: history, etiology, classification, and epidemiologic data. J Pediatr Orthop 2000; 9:11-15.
  13. Crawford AH, Schorry EK. Neurofibromatosis in children: the role of the orthopaedist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999; 7:217-230.[Abstract]
  14. Ablin DS. Osteogenesis imperfecta: a review. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998; 49:110-123.[Medline]
  15. Glorieux FH, Bishop NJ, Plotkin H, Chabot G, Lanoue G, Travers R. Cyclic administration of pamidronate in children with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:947-952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Grissom LE, Harcke HT. Radiographic features of bisphosphonate therapy in pediatric patients. Pediatr Radiol. (in press).
  17. Zaleske DJ. Metabolic and endocrine abnormalities. In: Morrissy RT, Weinstein SL, eds. Lovell and Winter’s pediatric orthopaedics. Vol II. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1996; 137-201.
  18. Steinbach HL, Noetzli M. Roentgen appearance of the skeleton in osteomalacia and rickets. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1964; 91:955-972.[Medline]
  19. Swischuk LE, Hayden CK. Rickets: a roentgenographic scheme for diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 1979; 8:203-208.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Schmickel RD, Heidelberger KP, Poznanski AK. The campomelique syndrome. J Pediatr 1973; 82:299-302.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Brooks WC, Gross RH. Genu varum in children: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995; 3:326-335.[Abstract]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheema, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Harcke, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheema, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Harcke, H. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Musculoskeletal Radiology
Right arrow Pediatric Radiology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE