|
|
||||||||
infoRAD |
1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Hospital, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Received September 4, 2001; revision requested January 5, 2002 and received July 1; accepted July 22. Address correspondence to W.J.W. (e-mail: weadock@umich.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
© RSNA, 2002
Index Terms: Computers, educational aid Radiological Society of North America 86th scientific assembly and annual meeting Radiology and radiologists, research
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ECEs may offer the viewer more educational potential than traditional scientific posters. ECEs range from a simple poster-type format to complicated computer programs that may include multimedia and user interactivity. Size limitations affect the number of images and amount of text that can be included in a poster, whereas an ECE format allows the author to include an unrestricted amount of information. Some ECEs include hundreds of images with accompanying text grouped by organ system or disease, providing the viewer with a wide range of examples. The ability to include video clips and animations in ECEs can also aid in teaching specific points (1). An ECE may allow users to browse their way to the specific information they seek or lead them through a topic. A well-presented ECE can offer the viewer greater educational opportunity than an oral presentation or poster and may exceed the value of a multihour refresher course in that it allows the reader to learn at his or her own pace.
Beyond the actual authoring, the computers operating system environment must be considered to maximize the educational benefit of an exhibit presented at a meeting. If an ECE is not functioning during the meeting, its content is irrelevant. Preparing the system in advance for possible problems will decrease exhibit downtime and improve the overall usefulness of the exhibit.
In this article, we describe an observational study of ECEs we performed at the 86th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in 2000. We also discuss our findings and present several suggestions for improving ECE performance in the future.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
No attempt was made to grade the intellectual quality of the various exhibits. At no time during data collection were any of the exhibits disabled by the authors.
Over one-half of the 71 exhibits (53%) were World Wide Web browserbased. Microsoft Internet Explorer (Redmond, Wash) was the most common application (41% of exhibits), followed by Netscape Communicator (AOLTime Warner, Dulles, Va) (13%), Microsoft PowerPoint (7%), and Microsoft Excel (3%). We were unable to determine the main presentation application in 20 exhibits (28%) (Fig 1).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The complexity of an ECE and its dependence on both a computer and a user to be functional may lead to failure. In general, it is not the presentation itself, but rather the configuration of the computer that leads to failure, including both the hardware and software environment. ECE developers may devote their time solely to the creation of the exhibit and overlook the configuration of the computer.
Additionally, many developers fail to take into account that intentional mischief will occur. On many occasions, we encountered exhibits that were not performing properly as the result of intentional tampering, which included (a) surfing the Web, (b) running other software programs on the computer, (c) viewing an exhibits hypertext markup language (HTML) code, (d) searching for files on the hard disk, (e) attempting to print, (f) turning the computer off, (g) deleting the entire exhibit from the computer, and (h) problems with hardware configurations. Other problems included computer responses to user input that likely were not options the authors had intended the user to see. Although these input actions are not malicious, they may disable a computer or cause a window to appear that can confuse the user. These actions included right-clicking on open windows, which may bring up a dialog box in many applications, or pressing certain keyboard combinations (eg, pressing Control-P may bring up a print dialog box).
The Web is mostly based on HTML, and there is considerable experience with its use. Basically, this application platform allows the user to interact by clicking on different objects on the screen, with each click determining what occurs next. Because the average user likely has some experience with either Internet Explorer or Netscape, exhibits based on this platform may perform better: Most users understand what to do and what not to do. If the exhibit application were to stop and only the desktop were visible, the user would likely click on the desktop icons to try to restart the exhibit.
HTML exhibits vary in complexity: Some require knowledge of the HTML programming language, whereas others may easily be created from within other programs, including Microsoft Word and PowerPoint. However, if an exhibit is not created properly, this same flexibility that HTML offers may also be its downfall. Logical coding errors can be decreased with use of one of a large number of dedicated HTML editing programs, including Microsoft Pagemaker, Macromedia Homesite and Dreamweaver (San Francisco, Calif), and Adobe Pagemill (San Jose, Calif). Commercial applications may be particularly helpful to the novice in improving Web-based media creation.
A limitation of this study is that, except for HTML-based exhibits, many other application programs had few ECEs based on them. Most of the discussion is directed toward HTML-based ECEs, but there are likely similar configuration options available for other applications. The authors were less familiar with some of the application programs, and complete evaluations are beyond the scope of this article.
The more functional exhibits often had two important features.
1. They limited access to the computers other functions, including features of the operating system, thereby minimizing intentional or unintentional disabling. Additionally, limiting the use of the browser to only the exhibit (including removal of default bookmarks and elimination of built-in e-mail and print capabilities) further reduces opportunities for mishaps. Furthermore, when the exhibit application program is not running in full screen mode, part of the desktop is visible. Maximizing the application window makes an errant click on a desktop icon impossible. These icons could include those that start other programs or allow viewing of the directory of the hard disk, both of which could potentially disable an exhibit.
2. They had a tool or instructions to help the end user start or restart the exhibit. This assumes that users are viewing the ECE to gain knowledge, and that if they encounter a computer problem, they will be able to attempt to restart the exhibit. Simple directions on a card or an icon on which to click are all the help a user should need. A summary of suggestions for improving ECE functionality is given in the Appendix.
Anecdotally, two of the authors (W.J.W., J.L.) had four Internet browserbased ECEs with all of the modifications listed in the Appendix, and during only one of the 76 total observations of these four exhibits was one of the exhibits nonfunctional (total percentage of downtime for all four exhibits was 1.3%). In this lone instance, a user had found the keyboard underneath the desk and had attempted to print the exhibit to a nonexistent printer by right-clicking on the browser and selecting the Print option.
As the graph in Figure 2 illustrates, the exhibits tended to become more functional as the day progressed. This may have been the result of "babysitting" on the part of the exhibit authors. Throughout the day, people were seen maintaining exhibits by restarting the application program when the program was not working. It was assumed that these people were the authors, but they may have been end users restarting exhibits.
Some downtime was the result of hardware problems. One exhibit was down for a period of time due to an improper video card. Another exhibit had an error message saying it was searching for a nonexistent Zip drive (Iomega, San Diego, Calif). If a presentation requires special hardware, the author must contact the meeting organizers and make arrangements prior to the meeting.
This study indicated that ECE authors should consider the computer environment when setting up their exhibits. A few modifications can significantly improve the chances of an exhibit running throughout the meeting. The Appendix can be used as a guideline for creating future exhibits. It describes basic operating system features and application features that can be modified or set to decrease the downtime of an exhibit. It is not meant to be an exhaustive review of how to completely control the operating system; consultation with a computer professional may lead to other useful recommendations not included here.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Appendix |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Suggested Modifications for All Exhibits
Suggested Modifications for Browser-based Exhibits
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |