(Radiographics. 1999;19:431-451.)
© RSNA, 1999
CT and MR Imaging of Benign Hepatic and Biliary Tumors
Karen M. Horton, MD1,
David A. Bluemke, MD1,
Ralph H. Hruban, MD2,
Philippe Soyer, MD, PhD3 and
Elliot K. Fishman, MD1
1 Departments of Radiology (K.M.H., D.A.B., E.K.F.)
2 Pathology (R.H.H.), Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md
3 Department of Body and Vascular Imaging, Hospital Lariboisiere, Paris, France (P.S.)
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Benign hepatic and biliary tumors can present a difficult diagnostic challenge. Spiral computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are useful in the detection and characterization of these tumors. Imaging characteristics of lesions such as hepatic cyst, hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), and hepatic adenoma are well known. Hepatic cysts demonstrate water attenuation at CT, are isointense relative to water at MR imaging, and do not enhance after intravenous administration of contrast material. Hemangiomas demonstrate characteristic nodular peripheral enhancement on early-phase images with subsequent fill-in centrally at both modalities. FNH classically demonstrates intense early enhancement with washout on delayed images. Although hepatic adenoma can also demonstrate intense early enhancement, it has a tendency to bleed and thus often appears more heterogeneous than FNH due to hemorrhage. Benign hepatic tumors that are less well described in the imaging literature include hepatic lipoma or angiomyolipoma, infantile hemangioendothelioma, and mesenchymal hamartoma. Hepatic lipoma has fat attenuation at CT, is isointense relative to fat at MR imaging, and does not enhance after intravenous administration of contrast material. Hepatic angiomyolipomas contain a variable amount of soft tissue in addition to fat and may therefore demonstrate enhancement at both modalities. The CT and MR imaging appearances of infantile hemangioma are similar to those of adult hemangioma. Infantile hemangioendothelioma occurs in infants under 6 months of age and is typically a larger lesion. Mesenchymal hamartoma also occurs in children, and its imaging appearance depends on the presence of stromal elements and the protein content of the cyst fluid. Familiarity with these imaging features can help distinguish particular disease entities.
Index Terms: Bile ducts, CT, 76.1211 • Bile ducts, MR, 76.1214 • Bile ducts, neoplasms, 76.31 • Liver neoplasms, 761.31 Liver neoplasms, CT, 761.1211 • Liver neoplasms, diagnosis, 761.1211, 761.1214 • Liver neoplasms, MR, 761.1214
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Benign liver tumors are fairly common and continue to present a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. At routine imaging studies, benign masses could be mistaken for primary malignant neoplasms or metastases, resulting in unnecessary surgery or incorrect cancer staging.
Most of the recent radiology literature concerning the liver has focused on lesion detection or identification of specific features (eg, enhancement patterns) that may help distinguish benign from malignant hepatic tumors. Except for hemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), little is known about imaging characteristics that can help identify and distinguish among the many less common benign liver masses.
In this article, we review a wide spectrum of benign hepatic tumors and present their cross-sectional imaging characteristics. In addition, we discuss optimization of examination techniques and protocols for both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, including a discussion of newer applications such as CT angiography and contrast material–enhanced MR imaging of the liver. We emphasize key differential diagnostic criteria for each of the benign hepatic masses.
|
CT TECHNIQUE
|
|---|
Spiral CT is currently the imaging modality of choice for evaluation of the liver and for detection of hepatic masses. Spiral CT offers many advantages over conventional dynamic CT. First, it allows rapid subsecond scanning, thus permitting scanning during different phases (arterial, portal, delayed) of hepatic enhancement. Second, partial volume averaging in imaging of liver lesions is reduced with spiral CT because axial reconstructions can be performed at optimal intervals and overlapping reconstructions can be obtained. Third, respiratory misregistration can be eliminated when the liver is scanned during a single breath hold. Finally, spiral CT data sets form the basis for three-dimensional (3D) imaging and CT angiography.
CT Protocols
Our routine abdominal CT protocol consists of a spiral CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis after oral and intravenous administration of contrast material. Typically, 120 mL (350 mg/mL iodine) of iohexol (Omnipaque; Sterling Winthrop, New York, NY) is injected at a rate of 2–3 mL/sec. The scan delay is typically 50 seconds, with a section thickness of 5 mm and a pitch of 1.6. Reconstructions are performed at 5-mm intervals.
In cases of suspected liver disease, specific liver protocols are used depending on the clinical question. For instance, for evaluation of a possible liver mass we perform a dedicated dual-phase spiral CT scan through the liver with additional delayed scans as needed. A 3–5-mm section thickness is used, with a pitch of 1–1.5 and a 3-mm reconstruction interval. If there is a known liver mass (eg, hemangioma) requiring further identification of enhancement characteristics, sequential CT scans of the liver are obtained after the intravenous administration of contrast material. This allows close observation of the dynamic enhancement pattern of the lesion.
3D CT Angiography
If 3D evaluation of the liver vasculature is desired, positive oral contrast agents such as diatrizoate meglumine (Hypaque 3%; Nycomed, Princeton, NJ) should not be used because they can interfere with 3D visualization of abdominal vessels. The appropriate scan delay is chosen to highlight either arterial flow (25 seconds) or venous flow (60 seconds). Intravenous injection rates of 3–5 mL/sec are optimal for CT angiography. Spiral CT data sets are obtained and then transferred over an Ethernet to an Infinite Reality or Onyx workstation with Reality Engine graphics (Silicon Graphics, Mountain View, Calif) for interactive volume rendering. The 3D volume set can then be manipulated by using different orientations and cut planes and by adjusting window level and width, brightness, and opacity to optimize visualization of the tumor and liver vasculature.
|
MR IMAGING TECHNIQUE
|
|---|
MR imaging is an important diagnostic tool in the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Advantages of MR imaging include multiplanar imaging capability, superior contrast resolution, and no ionizing radiation. Faster imagers and new imaging sequences allow dynamic imaging for lesion characterization.
Contrast Agents
Until recently, gadolinium chelates were the only MR imaging contrast agents approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Recently, however, other agents have been approved for hepatobiliary imaging.
Superparamagnetic Iron Oxides.—Superparamagnetic iron oxides are small iron particles that are taken up by the reticuloendothelial system, resulting in normal liver having decreased signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images (1,2). Currently, ferumoxides are used in an attempt to improve detection of metastases to the liver. Metastases do not have reticuloendothelial cells and do not take up the contrast material; consequently, they appear hyperintense relative to normal liver parenchyma on T2-weighted MR images (Fig 1).
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 1a. Metastases to the liver in a 67-year-old man with colon cancer. (a) Unenhanced fast spin-echo T2-weighted (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 5,000/104) MR image demonstrates a 1.5-cm metastasis (curved arrow) in the posterior segment of the right hepatic lobe and a 3-cm cyst (straight arrow) in the left lobe. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted (5,000/104) MR image obtained after administration of ferumoxide (Feridex; Advanced Magnetics, Cambridge, Mass) shows the normal liver and spleen with diffuse decreased signal intensity (cf a). The cyst (straight arrow) and the metastasis (curved arrow) do not take up the contrast agent and appear hyperintense.
|
|
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 1b. Metastases to the liver in a 67-year-old man with colon cancer. (a) Unenhanced fast spin-echo T2-weighted (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 5,000/104) MR image demonstrates a 1.5-cm metastasis (curved arrow) in the posterior segment of the right hepatic lobe and a 3-cm cyst (straight arrow) in the left lobe. (b) Fast spin-echo T2-weighted (5,000/104) MR image obtained after administration of ferumoxide (Feridex; Advanced Magnetics, Cambridge, Mass) shows the normal liver and spleen with diffuse decreased signal intensity (cf a). The cyst (straight arrow) and the metastasis (curved arrow) do not take up the contrast agent and appear hyperintense.
|
|
Although there have been some reports of benign hepatic tumors being visualized with ferumoxides, large-scale studies have not been conducted (3). Theoretically, benign tumors with functioning Kupffer cells (FNH, hepatocellular adenoma) should take up the contrast material (1). One study found that although there was accumulation of contrast material in FNH and adenoma, the tumors generally showed less signal intensity loss than normal liver and therefore had slightly higher signal intensity (3).
Other benign lesions without Kupffer cells (eg, cysts, cystadenomas, bile duct adenomas) do not take up the contrast material and therefore appear hyperintense relative to normal liver on contrast-enhanced T2-weighted MR images (Fig 1). For hemangiomas, the predominant effect of ferumoxides appears to be due to residual contrast material in the blood pool. Hemangiomas may have increased signal intensity on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images but have decreased signal intensity on contrast-enhanced T2-weighted images relative to unenhanced T2-weighted images (4). More studies are needed to determine the role of ferumoxides in the evaluation of other benign tumors.
Mangafodipir Trisodium.—A more recently developed paramagnetic agent, mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan; Nycomed, Princeton, NJ), has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in MR imaging of the liver. This agent is taken up by hepatocytes and shortens T1 relaxation time, leading to increased signal intensity in normal liver parenchyma on T1-weighted MR images. The use of mangafodipir trisodium is being studied as a means of improving the detection of liver metastases that do not take up the agent and therefore appear hypointense relative to normal liver on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. Its use in the detection or characterization of benign hepatic tumors has not been investigated. However, benign tumors that are hepatocellular in origin (eg, FNH) are expected to take up the agent and show T1 shortening (Fig 2).
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 2a. FNH. (a) Unenhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo (FMPSPGR) (110/4.2) MR image demonstrates a slightly hypointense, 8 x 6-cm mass in the right lobe of the liver (arrows). (b) Unenhanced fast spin-echo (5,454/105) MR image demonstrates the mass (arrows) with signal intensity characteristics similar to those of normal liver. A small central scar with high signal intensity is also seen. (c) FMPSPGR (170/4.2) MR image obtained after the administration of mangafodipir trisodium demonstrates increased signal intensity within the liver due to uptake of the agent by hepatocytes. The mass (arrows) shows increased signal intensity because FNH contains hepatocytes. The central scar now has decreased signal intensity.
|
|
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 2b. FNH. (a) Unenhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo (FMPSPGR) (110/4.2) MR image demonstrates a slightly hypointense, 8 x 6-cm mass in the right lobe of the liver (arrows). (b) Unenhanced fast spin-echo (5,454/105) MR image demonstrates the mass (arrows) with signal intensity characteristics similar to those of normal liver. A small central scar with high signal intensity is also seen. (c) FMPSPGR (170/4.2) MR image obtained after the administration of mangafodipir trisodium demonstrates increased signal intensity within the liver due to uptake of the agent by hepatocytes. The mass (arrows) shows increased signal intensity because FNH contains hepatocytes. The central scar now has decreased signal intensity.
|
|
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 2c. FNH. (a) Unenhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo (FMPSPGR) (110/4.2) MR image demonstrates a slightly hypointense, 8 x 6-cm mass in the right lobe of the liver (arrows). (b) Unenhanced fast spin-echo (5,454/105) MR image demonstrates the mass (arrows) with signal intensity characteristics similar to those of normal liver. A small central scar with high signal intensity is also seen. (c) FMPSPGR (170/4.2) MR image obtained after the administration of mangafodipir trisodium demonstrates increased signal intensity within the liver due to uptake of the agent by hepatocytes. The mass (arrows) shows increased signal intensity because FNH contains hepatocytes. The central scar now has decreased signal intensity.
|
|
MR Imaging Protocols
Our protocol for routine abdominal MR imaging consists of axial spin-echo T1-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR images through the abdomen and pelvis. Typically, an 8-mm section thickness with a 2-mm gap is used for abdominal images and a 10-mm section thickness with a 2-mm gap is used for pelvic images. Additional imaging planes are used if necessary.
If liver disease is suspected, specific liver protocols are used depending on the clinical question. For instance, for better characterization of a known liver mass, a variety of MR imaging sequences (FMPSPGR, fast spin-echo T2-weighted, fast-inversion-recovery, gradient-recalled acquisition in a steady state) are performed through the liver with use of a torso coil. In addition, axial FMPSPGR MR images are obtained through the liver following injection of 10–20 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Berlex, Wayne, NJ).
For better characterization of enhancement patterns in a known liver mass, 10–20 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine is injected at a rate of 1–2 mL/sec through a catheter placed in a peripheral vein. Sequential FMPSPGR MR images are obtained through the lesion at 30 seconds and 60 seconds after injection, then every 60 seconds for 5 minutes (or longer if necessary).
For studies performed with ferumoxides, images should be obtained within 3 hours after contrast material administration. At our institution, unenhanced FMPSPGR and fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR images are obtained. After being diluted in 100 mL of water with 5% dextrose, a ferumoxide is administered over 30 minutes by a nurse and contrast-enhanced axial FMPSPGR and fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences are performed.
For studies performed with mangafodipir trisodium, patients should be imaged within 10–15 minutes after contrast material administration. At our institution, unenhanced FMPSPGR MR images (with and without fat saturation) are obtained as well as unenhanced fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR images of the liver. Mangafodipir trisodium is then administered slowly over 3 minutes, and contrast-enhanced FMPSPGR MR images (with and without fat saturation) are obtained. High-resolution imaging (256 x 192 matrix) is used. With gadopentetate dimeglumine, the entire liver must be imaged during a single breath hold, and therefore only a 256 x 128 matrix can be used. With mangafodipir trisodium–enhanced early-phase and delayed images, increased imaging time can be used to decrease pixel size (and increase resolution) because imaging is performed under steady-state conditions.
|
BENIGN LIVER TUMORS
|
|---|
Hepatic Cysts
Hepatic cysts are common benign liver lesions that occur in 2%–7% of the population. These lesions may be isolated or multiple and vary from a few millimeters to several centimeters in diameter. Hepatic cysts are typically discovered incidentally and have no malignant potential. Certain diseases such as polycystic liver disease and polycystic kidney disease are associated with multiple hepatic cysts.
At CT, a hepatic cyst demonstrates water attenuation (0–10 HU). The wall is usually imperceptible, and the cyst does not enhance after intravenous administration of contrast material (Figs 3, 4). Similarly, at MR imaging a hepatic cyst is isointense relative to water (Fig 5) and does not enhance after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine.
View larger version (210K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 3a. Hepatic cyst. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a liver cyst at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). The liver parenchyma enhances, but the cyst does not. The walls of the cyst are imperceptible.
|
|
View larger version (199K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 3b. Hepatic cyst. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a liver cyst at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). The liver parenchyma enhances, but the cyst does not. The walls of the cyst are imperceptible.
|
|
View larger version (194K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 3c. Hepatic cyst. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a liver cyst at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). The liver parenchyma enhances, but the cyst does not. The walls of the cyst are imperceptible.
|
|
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 4. Hepatic cyst. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan reveals a large cyst with water attenuation in the right hepatic lobe (arrows). The cyst is unenhanced with imperceptible walls.
|
|
Hemangioma
Hemangioma is the most common benign liver tumor and is seen at autopsy in up to 7% of cases. Hemangiomas usually occur in women and are typically asymptomatic, incidental findings. Although hemangiomas can occur at any age, they are rarely diagnosed until adulthood. They may be isolated or multiple and often occur in the posterior segment of the right hepatic lobe (5,6). Hemangiomas are usually less than 5 cm in diameter but can be very large. They typically remain stable in size but may demonstrate growth (7).
Pathologically, hemangiomas are composed of many endothelium-lined vascular spaces separated by fibrous septa. They derive their blood supply from the hepatic artery.
At unenhanced CT, a hemangioma is hypoattenuating and well defined; at contrast-enhanced CT, it exhibits a characteristic pattern of enhancement (8,9). The tumor demonstrates nodular peripheral puddling of contrast material on early-phase images and subsequently fills in from the periphery (Figs 6–8). A central scar (if present) may not enhance, even on delayed images. Calcification within hemangiomas has been reported, although in our experience this is not common (<5% of cases).
View larger version (201K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 6a. Hemangioma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a hemangioma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Peripheral puddling of contrast material is characteristic of hemangiomas on early-phase images. The hemangioma subsequently fills in from the periphery. On delayed images, the mass may fill in completely and be isoattenuating or slightly hyperattenuating. Hemangiomas may not enhance completely if they are large or have a central scar.
|
|
View larger version (182K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 6b. Hemangioma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a hemangioma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Peripheral puddling of contrast material is characteristic of hemangiomas on early-phase images. The hemangioma subsequently fills in from the periphery. On delayed images, the mass may fill in completely and be isoattenuating or slightly hyperattenuating. Hemangiomas may not enhance completely if they are large or have a central scar.
|
|
View larger version (227K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 6c. Hemangioma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a hemangioma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Peripheral puddling of contrast material is characteristic of hemangiomas on early-phase images. The hemangioma subsequently fills in from the periphery. On delayed images, the mass may fill in completely and be isoattenuating or slightly hyperattenuating. Hemangiomas may not enhance completely if they are large or have a central scar.
|
|
View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 8a. Figures 7, 8. Hemangioma. (7a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan obtained during the arterial phase demonstrates a 3-cm, low-attenuation mass in the anterior segment of the right hepatic lobe (arrows). Note the characteristic peripheral nodular puddling of contrast material. (7b) Delayed CT scan obtained at the same level demonstrates complete enhancement of the mass (arrows), which now appears slightly hyperattenuating due to delayed washout of contrast material. (8a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan obtained during the arterial phase demonstrates an 8.5-cm mass in the left hepatic lobe (arrows). Characteristic puddling of contrast material is seen (cf Fig 7a). (8b) CT scan obtained at the same level during the portal phase demonstrates progressive enhancement of the lesion (arrows).
|
|
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 8b. Figures 7, 8. Hemangioma. (7a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan obtained during the arterial phase demonstrates a 3-cm, low-attenuation mass in the anterior segment of the right hepatic lobe (arrows). Note the characteristic peripheral nodular puddling of contrast material. (7b) Delayed CT scan obtained at the same level demonstrates complete enhancement of the mass (arrows), which now appears slightly hyperattenuating due to delayed washout of contrast material. (8a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan obtained during the arterial phase demonstrates an 8.5-cm mass in the left hepatic lobe (arrows). Characteristic puddling of contrast material is seen (cf Fig 7a). (8b) CT scan obtained at the same level during the portal phase demonstrates progressive enhancement of the lesion (arrows).
|
|
At MR imaging, hemangiomas usually appear hypointense and well defined on T1-weighted images and demonstrate a marked hyperintensity that increases with echo time on T2-weighted images (Fig 9) (5,10). After administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine, a hemangioma demonstrates the same characteristic pattern of enhancement as is seen at CT (Fig 10).
View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 9a. Hemangioma. T1-weighted (600/20) (a) and T2-weighted (2,500/60, 2,500/120) (b, c) MR images demonstrate the typical appearance of a liver hemangioma (arrow). Hemangiomas appear hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images with increasing echo time. b.
|
|
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 9b. Hemangioma. T1-weighted (600/20) (a) and T2-weighted (2,500/60, 2,500/120) (b, c) MR images demonstrate the typical appearance of a liver hemangioma (arrow). Hemangiomas appear hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images with increasing echo time. b.
|
|
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 9c. Hemangioma. T1-weighted (600/20) (a) and T2-weighted (2,500/60, 2,500/120) (b, c) MR images demonstrate the typical appearance of a liver hemangioma (arrow). Hemangiomas appear hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images with increasing echo time. b.
|
|
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 10a. Hemangioma. Dynamic T1-weighted (600/15) MR images demonstrate the classic enhancement pattern of a liver hemangioma (arrows). The hemangioma demonstrates early peripheral puddling of contrast material (a), then fills in from the periphery (b). The central area does not enhance due to a central scar.
|
|
View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 10b. Hemangioma. Dynamic T1-weighted (600/15) MR images demonstrate the classic enhancement pattern of a liver hemangioma (arrows). The hemangioma demonstrates early peripheral puddling of contrast material (a), then fills in from the periphery (b). The central area does not enhance due to a central scar.
|
|
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia
FNH is the second most common benign neoplasm of the liver after hemangioma. It typically occurs in young women and is usually discovered incidentally, although some patients may present with right upper quadrant pain (11). As with hepatic adenomas, there is an increased prevalence of FNH in women taking oral contraceptives (12).
FNH is thought to represent a benign hyperplastic response of the liver to a congenital arteriovenous malformation and is composed of hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, primitive bile ductules not connected with the biliary tree, and blood vessels (11). The mass is usually less than 5 cm in diameter and is often located near the liver surface. A central fibrous scar containing a small arteriovenous malformation may be present. Although FNH is highly vascular, it is unlikely to result in hemorrhage. FNH has no malignant potential, and multiple lesions may be seen at the time of presentation.
At unenhanced CT, FNH usually appears homogeneous, well defined, and hypoattenuating or isoattenuating relative to the liver; at contrast-enhanced CT, it exhibits a characteristic pattern of enhancement (6). FNH enhances brightly on early-phase images, and the contrast material subsequently washes out. On delayed scans, the mass may be isoattenuating relative to the liver and therefore imperceptible except for any mass effect. A central scar (if present) may demonstrate delayed enhancement and may remain bright on subsequent images due to delayed washout (Figs 11–13).
View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 11a. FNH. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of FNH at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). The mass enhances brightly during the arterial phase and may be completely isoattenuating on delayed scans. A central scar (if present) may demonstrate delayed enhancement that persists due to slow washout.
|
|
View larger version (218K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 11b. FNH. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of FNH at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). The mass enhances brightly during the arterial phase and may be completely isoattenuating on delayed scans. A central scar (if present) may demonstrate delayed enhancement that persists due to slow washout.
|
|
View larger version (248K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 11c. FNH. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of FNH at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). The mass enhances brightly during the arterial phase and may be completely isoattenuating on delayed scans. A central scar (if present) may demonstrate delayed enhancement that persists due to slow washout.
|
|
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 13a. Figures 12, 13. FNH. (12) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scans demonstrate the characteristic enhancement pattern of FNH (solid arrows) in the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Notice that the mass enhances dramatically early but is nearly imperceptible on the delayed scan. There is also a small, nonenhancing central scar (open arrow). (13a) Early-phase contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan demonstrates an 8-cm, isoattenuating hepatic mass (solid arrows) displacing adjacent vessels. A hypoattenuating central scar is also seen (open arrow). (13b) On a delayed CT scan obtained at the same level, the mass (solid arrows) is almost imperceptible except for persistent enhancement of the central scar (open arrow).
|
|
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 13b. Figures 12, 13. FNH. (12) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scans demonstrate the characteristic enhancement pattern of FNH (solid arrows) in the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Notice that the mass enhances dramatically early but is nearly imperceptible on the delayed scan. There is also a small, nonenhancing central scar (open arrow). (13a) Early-phase contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan demonstrates an 8-cm, isoattenuating hepatic mass (solid arrows) displacing adjacent vessels. A hypoattenuating central scar is also seen (open arrow). (13b) On a delayed CT scan obtained at the same level, the mass (solid arrows) is almost imperceptible except for persistent enhancement of the central scar (open arrow).
|
|
At MR imaging, FNH is isointense relative to normal liver and demonstrates early arterial enhancement after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Fig 14) (12). However, the central scar may appear hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images.
View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 14a. Classic appearance of FNH. (a, b) Unenhanced T1-weighted (198/4.2) (a) and T2-weighted (4,500/85) (b) MR images show a lesion (arrow) with signal intensity characteristics similar to those of normal liver. (c, d) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (198/4.2) MR images show the lesion (arrow) enhancing brightly during the arterial phase (c), then once again becoming indistinguishable from normal liver during the delayed phase (d).
|
|
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 14b. Classic appearance of FNH. (a, b) Unenhanced T1-weighted (198/4.2) (a) and T2-weighted (4,500/85) (b) MR images show a lesion (arrow) with signal intensity characteristics similar to those of normal liver. (c, d) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (198/4.2) MR images show the lesion (arrow) enhancing brightly during the arterial phase (c), then once again becoming indistinguishable from normal liver during the delayed phase (d).
|
|
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 14c. Classic appearance of FNH. (a, b) Unenhanced T1-weighted (198/4.2) (a) and T2-weighted (4,500/85) (b) MR images show a lesion (arrow) with signal intensity characteristics similar to those of normal liver. (c, d) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (198/4.2) MR images show the lesion (arrow) enhancing brightly during the arterial phase (c), then once again becoming indistinguishable from normal liver during the delayed phase (d).
|
|
View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 14d. Classic appearance of FNH. (a, b) Unenhanced T1-weighted (198/4.2) (a) and T2-weighted (4,500/85) (b) MR images show a lesion (arrow) with signal intensity characteristics similar to those of normal liver. (c, d) Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (198/4.2) MR images show the lesion (arrow) enhancing brightly during the arterial phase (c), then once again becoming indistinguishable from normal liver during the delayed phase (d).
|
|
Hepatic Adenoma
Hepatic adenoma occurs almost exclusively in young women taking oral contraceptives. Occasionally, however, it is seen in men who use anabolic steroids or in patients with glycogen storage disease.
Patients present with hepatomegaly or acute onset of right upper quadrant pain due to intratumoral hemorrhage. Adenomas can regress after discontinuation of oral contraceptives, although some adenomas will continue to grow and bleed. In addition, malignant transformation is seen on rare occasions (13). Thus, because of the risk of rupture or malignant transformation, hepatic adenomas are surgically removed.
Hepatic adenomas are typically 5–10 cm in diameter. They are surrounded by a capsule and do not have the normal hepatic architecture, being composed of benign hepatocytes arranged in sheets and cords. Areas of hemorrhage and infarction are often seen within the tumor.
At CT, hepatic adenomas appear as a well-defined, hypoattenuating mass. The presence of hemorrhage and heterogeneous attenuation is usually the key to correct identification (6). The borders are well defined because of the surrounding capsule. Moreover, because hepatic adenomas are supplied by the hepatic artery, they exhibit early enhancement and may appear isoattenuating relative to the liver on delayed scans (Figs 15–17a). The MR imaging appearance of hepatic adenomas also varies depending on the presence of hemorrhage (Fig 17b).
View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 15a. Hepatic adenoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a hepatic adenoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Overall, the enhancement pattern is similar to that of FNH. However, many hepatic adenomas have a more complex appearance due to the presence of acute or chronic hemorrhage.
|
|
View larger version (159K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 15b. Hepatic adenoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a hepatic adenoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Overall, the enhancement pattern is similar to that of FNH. However, many hepatic adenomas have a more complex appearance due to the presence of acute or chronic hemorrhage.
|
|
View larger version (211K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 15c. Hepatic adenoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a hepatic adenoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Overall, the enhancement pattern is similar to that of FNH. However, many hepatic adenomas have a more complex appearance due to the presence of acute or chronic hemorrhage.
|
|
View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 17a. Hepatic adenoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates an ill-defined, heterogeneously enhanced liver mass (arrows) with a central area of low attenuation. (b) T2-weighted MR image demonstrates high signal intensity within the mass as well as small, nodular satellite lesions. At surgery, a hepatic adenoma with hemorrhage was diagnosed.
|
|
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 17b. Hepatic adenoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates an ill-defined, heterogeneously enhanced liver mass (arrows) with a central area of low attenuation. (b) T2-weighted MR image demonstrates high signal intensity within the mass as well as small, nodular satellite lesions. At surgery, a hepatic adenoma with hemorrhage was diagnosed.
|
|
Infantile Hemangioendothelioma
Infantile hemangioendothelioma is a benign but aggressive liver tumor that usually manifests in infants less than 6 months old who present with hepatomegaly or an abdominal mass (14). Congestive heart failure, bleeding, anemia, thrombocytopenia, or cutaneous hemangioma may also be present. Although hemangioendothelioma is a benign tumor that typically resolves spontaneously, children may die of complications such as severe heart failure (14). Malignant transformation into angiosarcoma has been reported but is rare (15,16).
Pathologically, infantile hemangioendothelioma is composed of a network of connecting vascular channels lined by endothelial cells (14). It is typically a large (1–20-cm), solitary mass but may be multifocal.
At unenhanced CT, infantile hemangioendothelioma usually appears as a large, well-defined, hypoattenuating mass. Up to 16% of these masses demonstrate calcification, and hemorrhage is not uncommon (17). After intravenous administration of contrast material, the enhancement pattern may resemble that of a hemangioma (Figs 18, 19). Multifocal lesions are usually small, frequently enhance completely, and typically do not demonstrate hemorrhage or necrosis. This appearance may be mistaken for metastases (14).
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 18a. Hemangioendothelioma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of an infantile hemangioendothelioma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These tumors are usually large and demonstrate an enhancement pattern similar to that of hemangiomas, but they occur in young children.
|
|
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 18b. Hemangioendothelioma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of an infantile hemangioendothelioma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These tumors are usually large and demonstrate an enhancement pattern similar to that of hemangiomas, but they occur in young children.
|
|
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 18c. Hemangioendothelioma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of an infantile hemangioendothelioma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These tumors are usually large and demonstrate an enhancement pattern similar to that of hemangiomas, but they occur in young children.
|
|
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 19a. Hemangioendothelioma in a neonate with congestive heart failure. (a) Early-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates a 20-cm hemangioendothelioma with peripheral lobular areas of intense enhancement. (b) Delayed CT scan shows inhomogeneous enhancement of the mass.
|
|
View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 19b. Hemangioendothelioma in a neonate with congestive heart failure. (a) Early-phase contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates a 20-cm hemangioendothelioma with peripheral lobular areas of intense enhancement. (b) Delayed CT scan shows inhomogeneous enhancement of the mass.
|
|
Mesenchymal Hamartoma
Mesenchymal hamartoma is a rare, benign liver neoplasm that probably represents a congenital malformation. It usually occurs in children under 2 years of age and is slightly more common in boys. Patients typically present with an asymptomatic abdominal mass (18). To our knowledge, malignant transformation has not been reported. Treatment consists of surgical resection.
Pathologically, mesenchymal hamartoma is a large mass measuring 12–15 cm in diameter. It is composed of loose edematous tissue, blood vessels, small groups of hepatocytes, and bile ducts (19).
At unenhanced CT, mesenchymal hamartoma usually has a heterogeneous appearance. The stromal elements appear hypoattenuating, whereas the cystic component has water attenuation (19). The appearance of the mass depends on whether it is predominantly stromal (mesenchymal) or cystic. Hemorrhage occasionally occurs but is not typical. After intravenous administration of contrast material, the stromal component enhances (Figs 20, 21). The MR imaging appearance of mesenchymal hamartoma varies depending on the presence of stromal elements and the protein content of the fluid (Fig 21).
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 20a. Mesenchymal hamartoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a mesenchymal hamartoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These tumors are typically large and have a complex cystic or solid imaging appearance that varies depending on the amount of stromal tissue present. It is these stromal elements that enhance.
|
|
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 20b. Mesenchymal hamartoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a mesenchymal hamartoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These tumors are typically large and have a complex cystic or solid imaging appearance that varies depending on the amount of stromal tissue present. It is these stromal elements that enhance.
|
|
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 20c. Mesenchymal hamartoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a mesenchymal hamartoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These tumors are typically large and have a complex cystic or solid imaging appearance that varies depending on the amount of stromal tissue present. It is these stromal elements that enhance.
|
|
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 21a. Large mesenchymal hamartoma in a young child. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (a), T1-weighted MR image (b), and T2-weighted MR image (c) show that the tumor is predominantly cystic but has a thick wall and some enhancing internal stromal components.
|
|
View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 21b. Large mesenchymal hamartoma in a young child. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (a), T1-weighted MR image (b), and T2-weighted MR image (c) show that the tumor is predominantly cystic but has a thick wall and some enhancing internal stromal components.
|
|
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 21c. Large mesenchymal hamartoma in a young child. Contrast-enhanced CT scan (a), T1-weighted MR image (b), and T2-weighted MR image (c) show that the tumor is predominantly cystic but has a thick wall and some enhancing internal stromal components.
|
|
Benign Lipomatous Tumors
Hepatic angiomyolipoma is a rare, benign mesenchymal tumor that may be isolated or may occur in association with tuberous sclerosis (20,21). It is usually asymptomatic and discovered incidentally.
Hepatic angiomyolipoma is composed of smooth muscle cells, fat, and proliferating blood vessels. Successful diagnosis relies on identification of intratumoral fat at imaging or fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Surgical resection is not necessary unless there is associated pain, which occasionally results from intratumoral hemorrhage.
There have also been reports of pure lipomas of the liver (22). These tumors range from a few millimeters to 13 cm in diameter. There is no risk of malignant degeneration, and because the imaging appearance of lipomas is characteristic, percutaneous biopsy or surgery is usually unnecessary.
At CT and MR imaging, simple lipomas demonstrate fat attenuation or signal intensity and do not enhance after contrast material administration (Figs 22, 23) (20,22). Angiomyolipomas usually appear as a combination of fat and soft tissue (20). The soft-tissue component may enhance with intravenous administration of contrast material (Fig 24).
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 22a. Lipoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a liver lipoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Lipomas have fat attenuation and do not enhance with contrast material.
|
|
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 22b. Lipoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a liver lipoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Lipomas have fat attenuation and do not enhance with contrast material.
|
|
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 22c. Lipoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a liver lipoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Lipomas have fat attenuation and do not enhance with contrast material.
|
|
View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 23. Lipoma in a patient with tuberous sclerosis. CT scan demonstrates a 1-cm lipoma with an attenuation value of -15 HU in the right hepatic lobe (straight arrow). The patient also had an angiomyolipoma in the left kidney (curved arrows).
|
|
View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 24a. Angiomyolipoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a liver angiomyolipoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Angiomyolipomas are typically a mixture of fatty and mesenchymal elements. The soft-tissue components enhance, whereas the fat does not.
|
|
View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 24b. Angiomyolipoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a liver angiomyolipoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Angiomyolipomas are typically a mixture of fatty and mesenchymal elements. The soft-tissue components enhance, whereas the fat does not.
|
|
View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 24c. Angiomyolipoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a liver angiomyolipoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Angiomyolipomas are typically a mixture of fatty and mesenchymal elements. The soft-tissue components enhance, whereas the fat does not.
|
|
|
BENIGN BILIARY TUMORS
|
|---|
Biliary Cystadenoma
Biliary cystadenoma is an uncommon, multilocular cystic liver mass that originates in the bile duct and usually occurs in the right hepatic lobe. It typically occurs in adults, especially in women with a classic complaint of chronic abdominal pain. The cause of biliary cystadenoma is not known. It may represent a congenital anomaly of the biliary anlage (23). Although it is a benign tumor, recurrence after surgical resection is common (24). Malignant transformation to cystadenocarcinoma is not uncommon.
Pathologically, biliary cystadenoma appears as a multilocular cystic mass containing proteinaceous fluid and lined with cuboid or columnar epithelium (25). Intracystic soft-tissue components may be present but do not always indicate malignant transformation. Focal calcifications can occur.
At unenhanced CT, biliary cystadenoma usually appears well defined and cystic. The wall and internal septations are often visible and help distinguish this lesion from a simple cyst (Fig 15) (26). The cyst walls and any other soft-tissue components typically enhance after intravenous administration of contrast material (Figs 25, 26). The MR imaging appearance of biliary cystadenoma varies depending on the protein content of the fluid and the presence of an intracystic soft-tissue component (Fig 27).
View larger version (227K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 25a. Cystadenoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a cystadenoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Cystadenomas typically appear as complex cystic masses with enhancing walls, septa, and stromal elements.
|
|
View larger version (211K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 25b. Cystadenoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a cystadenoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Cystadenomas typically appear as complex cystic masses with enhancing walls, septa, and stromal elements.
|
|
View larger version (217K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 25c. Cystadenoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a cystadenoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Cystadenomas typically appear as complex cystic masses with enhancing walls, septa, and stromal elements.
|
|
View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 26. Cystadenoma. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan demonstrates a large cystic mass in the left lobe of the liver. Enhancement of the lesion wall and of internal septations is seen.
|
|
View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 27a. Cystadenoma. Coronal T1-weighted (a) and axial T2-weighted (b) MR images demonstrate a large cystic mass (arrowheads) compressing the adjacent normal liver tissue. At surgery, a cystadenoma was diagnosed.
|
|
View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 27b. Cystadenoma. Coronal T1-weighted (a) and axial T2-weighted (b) MR images demonstrate a large cystic mass (arrowheads) compressing the adjacent normal liver tissue. At surgery, a cystadenoma was diagnosed.
|
|
Bile Duct Hamartoma or Adenoma
Bile duct hamartoma, also known as von Meyenburg complex, is a benign tumor composed of disorganized bile ducts and ductules and fibrocollagenous stroma. The tumor is usually small, ranging from 1 to 5 mm in diameter, although the nodules may coalesce into larger masses. Although bile duct hamartoma is benign, there have been reports of an association of cholangiocarcinoma with multiple bile duct hamartomas (27).
Bile duct hamartoma has a nonspecific imaging appearance and can simulate metastases or microabscesses (28,29); therefore, histologic diagnosis is required.
Bile duct adenoma is a benign, asymptomatic mass that is typically discovered incidentally at imaging studies, during surgery, or at autopsy (30). It is usually a well circumscribed, subcapsular mass ranging from 1 mm to 1 cm in diameter and composed of bile ductules and various amounts of inflammatory reaction and fibrosis. Some pathologists believe that this tumor is actually a reactive process to injury rather than a true neoplasm or developmental anomaly (30).
It is often difficult to distinguish a bile duct adenoma from a hamartoma at pathologic analysis. At unenhanced CT, a bile duct hamartoma or adenoma usually appears as a small, well-defined hypo- or isoattenuating mass. After contrast material administration, it demonstrates little if any enhancement (Figs 28, 29) (29). Multiple bile duct hamartomas may simulate metastases or hepatic abscesses (Fig 30). At MR imaging, the appearance of a bile duct hamartoma or adenoma is nonspecific. The lesion usually appears hypointense on T1-weighted images, iso- or slightly hyperintense on T2-weighted images, and hypointense after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Definitive diagnosis can be made only at histologic analysis.
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 28a. Classic appearance of bile duct adenoma or hamartoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of bile duct adenomas or hamartomas at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These lesions are typically small (1–10 mm) and located near the periphery of the liver. They usually demonstrate little enhancement with contrast material.
|
|
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 28b. Classic appearance of bile duct adenoma or hamartoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of bile duct adenomas or hamartomas at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These lesions are typically small (1–10 mm) and located near the periphery of the liver. They usually demonstrate little enhancement with contrast material.
|
|
View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 28c. Classic appearance of bile duct adenoma or hamartoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of bile duct adenomas or hamartomas at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These lesions are typically small (1–10 mm) and located near the periphery of the liver. They usually demonstrate little enhancement with contrast material.
|
|
View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 29. Figures 29, 30. Bile duct adenoma. (29) Contrast-enhanced CT scan reveals a 3-cm hypoattenuating mass (arrow) in the peripheral aspect of the liver. Bile duct adenoma was diagnosed at pathologic analysis. This tumor is larger than the typical bile duct adenoma. (30) Unenhanced CT scan demonstrates two 1.5-cm low-attenuation lesions (arrows) in the periphery of the liver. When bile duct adenomas or hamartomas are multiple, they can simulate metastatic disease.
|
|
View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 30. Figures 29, 30. Bile duct adenoma. (29) Contrast-enhanced CT scan reveals a 3-cm hypoattenuating mass (arrow) in the peripheral aspect of the liver. Bile duct adenoma was diagnosed at pathologic analysis. This tumor is larger than the typical bile duct adenoma. (30) Unenhanced CT scan demonstrates two 1.5-cm low-attenuation lesions (arrows) in the periphery of the liver. When bile duct adenomas or hamartomas are multiple, they can simulate metastatic disease.
|
|
Papillary Adenoma
Papillary adenoma is a very rare benign tumor of the biliary tract. It is usually solitary, although multiple lesions (papillomatosis) can occur. Solitary papillary adenomas usually occur in the common hepatic duct and less commonly arise in the right or left hepatic duct. They most commonly manifest with biliary obstruction. Although they are benign, papillary adenomas demonstrate a high rate of recurrence. Also, malignant transformation has been reported.
Pathologically, the tumors are composed of columnar epithelium supported by connective tissue from the lamina propria with capillary fronds extending into the lumen.
Most papillary adenomas are small, intraductal masses that are not visualized at cross-sectional imaging. Occasionally, a papillary adenoma is large enough to be detected, appearing as a soft-tissue mass within dilated ducts (Figs 31, 32).
View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 31a. Papillary adenoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a papillary adenoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These lesions are usually intraductal and may cause ductal obstruction. They are typically very small (<5 mm) and are often not visualized at cross-sectional imaging.
|
|
View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 31b. Papillary adenoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a papillary adenoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These lesions are usually intraductal and may cause ductal obstruction. They are typically very small (<5 mm) and are often not visualized at cross-sectional imaging.
|
|
View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 31c. Papillary adenoma. Illustrations demonstrate the appearance of a papillary adenoma at contrast-enhanced spiral CT during the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). These lesions are usually intraductal and may cause ductal obstruction. They are typically very small (<5 mm) and are often not visualized at cross-sectional imaging.
|
|
View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 32a. Papillary adenoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan demonstrates an enhancing mass (arrow) dilating a central bile duct with local invasion of the liver. (b) On an axial T2-weighted (5,400/105) MR image, the mass (arrow) is again seen causing ductal obstruction.
|
|
View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 32b. Papillary adenoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan demonstrates an enhancing mass (arrow) dilating a central bile duct with local invasion of the liver. (b) On an axial T2-weighted (5,400/105) MR image, the mass (arrow) is again seen causing ductal obstruction.
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
|
|---|
Benign liver tumors continue to present a challenge to the radiologist and clinician. By simulating malignant masses or metastases, such tumors can lead to erroneous management decisions. Therefore, it is important for the radiologist to be familiar with the CT and MR imaging characteristics of a variety of benign liver tumors. Although the imaging features often overlap, there are specific CT and MR imaging findings that can help distinguish particular entities.
View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 7a. Figures 7, 8. Hemangioma. (7a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan obtained during the arterial phase demonstrates a 3-cm, low-attenuation mass in the anterior segment of the right hepatic lobe (arrows). Note the characteristic peripheral nodular puddling of contrast material. (7b) Delayed CT scan obtained at the same level demonstrates complete enhancement of the mass (arrows), which now appears slightly hyperattenuating due to delayed washout of contrast material. (8a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan obtained during the arterial phase demonstrates an 8.5-cm mass in the left hepatic lobe (arrows). Characteristic puddling of contrast material is seen (cf Fig 7a). (8b) CT scan obtained at the same level during the portal phase demonstrates progressive enhancement of the lesion (arrows).
|
|
View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 7b. Figures 7, 8. Hemangioma. (7a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan obtained during the arterial phase demonstrates a 3-cm, low-attenuation mass in the anterior segment of the right hepatic lobe (arrows). Note the characteristic peripheral nodular puddling of contrast material. (7b) Delayed CT scan obtained at the same level demonstrates complete enhancement of the mass (arrows), which now appears slightly hyperattenuating due to delayed washout of contrast material. (8a) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan obtained during the arterial phase demonstrates an 8.5-cm mass in the left hepatic lobe (arrows). Characteristic puddling of contrast material is seen (cf Fig 7a). (8b) CT scan obtained at the same level during the portal phase demonstrates progressive enhancement of the lesion (arrows).
|
|
View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 12a. Figures 12, 13. FNH. (12) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scans demonstrate the characteristic enhancement pattern of FNH (solid arrows) in the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Notice that the mass enhances dramatically early but is nearly imperceptible on the delayed scan. There is also a small, nonenhancing central scar (open arrow). (13a) Early-phase contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan demonstrates an 8-cm, isoattenuating hepatic mass (solid arrows) displacing adjacent vessels. A hypoattenuating central scar is also seen (open arrow). (13b) On a delayed CT scan obtained at the same level, the mass (solid arrows) is almost imperceptible except for persistent enhancement of the central scar (open arrow).
|
|
View larger version (151K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 12b. Figures 12, 13. FNH. (12) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scans demonstrate the characteristic enhancement pattern of FNH (solid arrows) in the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Notice that the mass enhances dramatically early but is nearly imperceptible on the delayed scan. There is also a small, nonenhancing central scar (open arrow). (13a) Early-phase contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan demonstrates an 8-cm, isoattenuating hepatic mass (solid arrows) displacing adjacent vessels. A hypoattenuating central scar is also seen (open arrow). (13b) On a delayed CT scan obtained at the same level, the mass (solid arrows) is almost imperceptible except for persistent enhancement of the central scar (open arrow).
|
|
View larger version (147K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 12c. Figures 12, 13. FNH. (12) Contrast-enhanced spiral CT scans demonstrate the characteristic enhancement pattern of FNH (solid arrows) in the arterial phase (a), portal phase (b), and delayed phase (c). Notice that the mass enhances dramatically early but is nearly imperceptible on the delayed scan. There is also a small, nonenhancing central scar (open arrow). (13a) Early-phase contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan demonstrates an 8-cm, isoattenuating hepatic mass (solid arrows) displacing adjacent vessels. A hypoattenuating central scar is also seen (open arrow). (13b) On a delayed CT scan obtained at the same level, the mass (solid arrows) is almost imperceptible except for persistent enhancement of the central scar (open arrow).
|
|
View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 16a. Hepatic adenoma. (a) Unenhanced CT scan demonstrates an 8-cm, low-attenuation mass in the right lobe of the liver (arrows). (b) On a contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan, the mass demonstrates intense early enhancement.
|
|
View larger version (152K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 16b. Hepatic adenoma. (a) Unenhanced CT scan demonstrates an 8-cm, low-attenuation mass in the right lobe of the liver (arrows). (b) On a contrast-enhanced spiral CT scan, the mass demonstrates intense early enhancement.
|
|
|
Footnotes
|
|---|
Address reprint requests to E.K.F., Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 N Caroline St, Rm 3251, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Abbreviations: FMPSPGR = fast multiplanar spoiled gradient echo
FNH = focal nodular hyperplasia
3D = three dimensional
CME FEATURE This article meets the criteria for 1.0 credit hour in category 1 of the AMA Physician's Recognition Award. To obtain credit, see the questionnaire on pp 472–480.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES After reading this article and taking the test, the reader will:
• Understand the roles of CT and MR imaging in the detection and characteriza-tion of benign liver tumors.
• Be familiar with the clinical manifestations, pathologic findings, and radiologic features associ-ated with a wide variety of benign hepatic and biliary tumors.
• Recognize CT and MR imaging characteristics and enhancement patterns that can aid in the differ-ential diagnosis of liver tumors.
Received for publication March 26, 1998.
Revision received May 5, 1998. August 12, 1998.
Accepted for publication August 17, 1998.
|
References
|
|---|
-
Vogl T, Hammerstingl R, Schwarz W, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide: enhanced versus gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging for differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Radiology 1996; 198:881-887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schwartz L, Seltzer S, Tempany C, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide hepatic MR imaging: efficacy and safety using conventional and fast spin-echo pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5:566-570.[Medline]
-
Grandin C, VanBeers B, Robert A, Gigot J, Geugel A, Pringot J. Benign hepatocellular tumors: MRI after superparamagnetic iron oxide administration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 193:412-418.
-
Ferrucci J, Stark D. Iron oxide–enhanced MR imaging of the liver and spleen: review of the first 5 years. AJR 1990; 155:943-950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ohtomo K, Itai Y, Yoshikawa K, Kokubo T, Ilo M. Hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with MR imaging—efficacy of T2 values at 0.35 and 1.5T. Radiology 1988; 168:621-623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mathieu D, Bruneton J, Drouillard J, Pointreau C, Vasile N. Hepatic adenomas and focal nodular hyperplasia: dynamic CT study. Radiology 1986; 160:53-58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nghiem H, Bogost G, Ryan J, Lund P, Freeny P, Rice K. Cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: enlargement over time. AJR 1997; 169:137-140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Quinn S, Benjamin G. Hepatic cavernous hemangiomas: simple diagnostic sign with dynamic bolus CT. Radiology 1992; 182:545-548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ashida C, Fishman E, Zerhouni E, et al. Computed tomography of hepatic cavernous hemangioma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983; 1983:455-460.
-
Itoh K, Saini S, Hahn P, Imam N, Ferucci J. Differentiation between small hepatic hemangiomas and metastases on MR: importance of size-specific quantitative criteria. AJR 1990; 155:61-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Buetow P, Pantongrag-Brown L, Buck J, Ross P, Goodman Z. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1996; 16:369-388.[Abstract]
-
Nagorney D. Benign hepatic tumors: focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma. World J Surg 1995; 19:13-18.[Medline]
-
Foster J, Berman M. The malignant transformation of liver cell adenomas. Arch Surg 1994; 129:712-717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Keslar P, Buck J, Selby D. Infantile hemangioendothelioma of the liver revisited. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:657-670.[Abstract]
-
Weinberg A, Fiengold M. Primary hepatic tumors of childhood. Hum Pathol 1983; 14:512-537.[Medline]
-
Selby D, Stocker J, Ishak K. Angiosarcoma of the liver in childhood: a clinicopathologic follow-up study of 10 cases. Pediatr Pathol 1992; 12:485-498.[Medline]
-
Lucaya J, Enriquez G, Amat L, Gonzalez-Rivero M. Computed tomography of infantile hemangioendothelioma. AJR 1985; 144:821-826.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
George J, Cohen M, Tarver R, Rosales R. Ruptured cystic mesenchymal hamartoma: an unusual cause of neonatal ascites. Pediatr Radiol 1994; 24:304-305.[Medline]
-
Ros P, Goodman Z, Ishak KG, et al. Mesenchymal hamartoma of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1986; 158:619-624.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hooper L, Mergo P, Ros P. Multiple hepatorenal angiomyolipomas: diagnosis with fat suppression, gadoliniun enhanced MRI. Abdom Imaging 1994; 19:549-551.[Medline]
-
Roberts R, Fishman E, Hartman D, Sanders R, Goodman Z, Siegelman S. Lipomatous tumors of the liver: evaluation with CT and US. Radiology 1986; 158:613-617.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bruneton J, Kerboul P, Drouillard J, Menu Y, Normand F, Santini N. Hepatic lipomas: ultrasound and computed tomographic findings. Gastrointest Radiol 1987; 12:299-303.[Medline]
-
Kokal K, Abraham P, Pimparker B, Desai A, Bapat R. Biliary cystadenoma of the liver. J Postgrad Med 1983; 29:53-55.[Medline]
-
Sanchez H, Gagner M, Roosi R, et al. Surgical management of nonparasitic cystic liver disease. Am J Surg 1991; 161:113-119.[Medline]
-
Fairchild R, Reese J, Solomon H, Garvin P, Esterl R. Biliary cystadenoma: a case report and review of the literature. Mo Med 1993; 90:656-657.[Medline]
-
Frick M, Feinberg S. Biliary cystadenoma. AJR 1982; 139:393-395.[Free Full Text]
-
Bonfors M. The development of cholangiocarcinoma from multiple bile duct hamartomas. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 1984; 2:235-238.
-
Sada PN, Ramakrishna B. Computed tomography of von Meyenburg complex simulating microabscesses. Australas Radiol 1994; 38:225-226.[Medline]
-
Eisenberg D, Hurwitz L, Yu A. CT and sonography of multiple bile duct hamartomas simulating malignant disease. AJR 1986; 147:279-280.[Free Full Text]
-
Allaire G, Rabin L, Ishak K, Sesterhenn I. Bile duct adenoma: a study of 152 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12:708-715.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. Bruegel, J. Gaa, S. Waldt, K. Woertler, K. Holzapfel, B. Kiefer, and E. J. Rummeny
Diagnosis of Hepatic Metastasis: Comparison of Respiration-Triggered Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar MRI and Five T2-Weighted Turbo Spin-Echo Sequences
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
November 1, 2008;
191(5):
1421 - 1429.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-X. Xu, X.-Y. Xie, M.-D. Lu, G.-J. Liu, Z.-F. Xu, J.-Y. Liang, and L.-D. Chen
Unusual Benign Focal Liver Lesions: Findings on Real-time Contrast-Enhanced Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med.,
February 1, 2008;
27(2):
243 - 254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-Y CHA, K W KIM, Y J CHOI, J S SONG, K J CHO, and M-G LEE
Multicystic cavernous haemangioma of the liver: ultrasonography, CT, MR appearances and pathological correlation
Br. J. Radiol.,
February 1, 2008;
81(962):
e37 - e39.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Kim, K. W. Kim, S. H. Park, S. J. Jang, M.-S. Park, P. N. Kim, M.-G. Lee, and H. K. Ha
Unusual mesenchymal liver tumors in adults: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
November 1, 2006;
187(5):
W481 - W489.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. N. Gandhi, M. A. Brown, J. G. Wong, D. A. Aguirre, and C. B. Sirlin
MR Contrast Agents for Liver Imaging: What, When, How
RadioGraphics,
November 1, 2006;
26(6):
1621 - 1636.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Onishi, T. Murakami, T. Kim, M. Hori, R. Iannaccone, M. Kuwabara, H. Abe, S. Nakata, K. Osuga, K. Tomoda, et al.
Hepatic Metastases: Detection with Multi-Detector Row CT, SPIO-enhanced MR Imaging, and Both Techniques Combined
Radiology,
April 1, 2006;
239(1):
131 - 138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Elsayes, V. R. Narra, Y. Yin, G. Mukundan, M. Lammle, and J. J. Brown
Focal Hepatic Lesions: Diagnostic Value of Enhancement Pattern Approach with Contrast-enhanced 3D Gradient-Echo MR Imaging
RadioGraphics,
September 1, 2005;
25(5):
1299 - 1320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Grazioli, G. Morana, M. A. Kirchin, and G. Schneider
Accurate Differentiation of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia from Hepatic Adenoma at Gadobenate Dimeglumine-enhanced MR Imaging: Prospective Study
Radiology,
July 1, 2005;
236(1):
166 - 177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Basaran, M. Karcaaltincaba, D. Akata, N. Karabulut, D. Akinci, M. Ozmen, and O. Akhan
Fat-Containing Lesions of the Liver: Cross-Sectional Imaging Findings with Emphasis on MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
April 1, 2005;
184(4):
1103 - 1110.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. von Herbay, C. Vogt, R. Willers, and D. Haussinger
Real-time Imaging With the Sonographic Contrast Agent SonoVue: Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Hepatic Lesions
J. Ultrasound Med.,
December 1, 2004;
23(12):
1557 - 1568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Gallego, M. Miralles, C. Marin, P. Muyor, G. Gonzalez, and E. Garcia-Hidalgo
Congenital Hepatic Shunts
RadioGraphics,
May 1, 2004;
24(3):
755 - 772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Roos, R. Pfiffner, T. Stallmach, G. Stuckmann, B. Marincek, and U. Willi
Infantile Hemangioendothelioma
RadioGraphics,
November 1, 2003;
23(6):
1649 - 1655.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. H. Theumann, J. Bittoun, S. Goettmann, D. Le Viet, A. Chevrot, and J.-L. Drapé
Hemangiomas of the Fingers: MR Imaging Evaluation
Radiology,
March 1, 2001;
218(3):
841 - 847.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
Top
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
