RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

DOI: 10.1148/rg.274065124
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kangarloo, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kangarloo, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Informatics
Right arrow Management
Right arrow Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement

A Prototype Web-based Reporting System for Onsite-Offsite Clinician Communication1

Corey W. Arnold, MS, Alex A. T. Bui, PhD, Craig Morioka, PhD, Suzie El-Saden, MD, and Hooshang Kangarloo, MD

1 From the Medical Imaging Informatics Group (C.W.A., A.A.T.B., C.M., S.E., H.K.) and the Department of Information Studies (C.W.A.), University of California, Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd, Suite 420, Los Angeles, CA 90024. Presented as an infoRAD exhibit at the 2003 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received June 27, 2006; revision requested August 18; final revision received January 25, 2007; accepted February 19. Supported in part by NIBIB grants PO1-EB00216 and RO1-EB002247, and by NLM Medical Informatics Training grant LM07356. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

Figure 1
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 1.  Diagram illustrates a system developed for onsite-offsite clinician communication. The system allows communication between offsite PCPs and onsite radiologists, as well as between offsite radiologists performing wet-reads and onsite radiologists performing final interpretations.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 2.  Wet-read request interface. The user provides basic patient information and indicates the type of wet-read to be performed ("Request type" field).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 3.  Screen used by the offsite radiologist to perform a wet-read. A study is annotated by scrolling through images, marking up selected images and typing in comments when appropriate. A indicates pertinent positive and pertinent negative questions, as well as a free-text comment box; B indicates selectable ACR anatomy and pathology codes, which may be selected to support future uses of the data; C indicates various image annotation, manipulation, and viewing tools; and D indicates the image window, which displays the current image in the series.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 4.  Screen used to display imaging results to a PCP. Only the pertinent images are displayed, along with any associated comments. A indicates pertinent positive and pertinent negative findings and free-text comments; B indicates selected ACR anatomy and pathology codes; C indicates image manipulation and viewing tools, which are provided should the PCP wish to adjust the view to better understand the results; and D indicates the image window, which displays the current image in the series, along with annotations.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.