RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.25si055512
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Vliet, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krestin, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Vliet, M.
Right arrow Articles by Krestin, G. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Vascular and/or Interventional Radiology
Right arrowRelated Article

MR Angiography of Tumor-related Vasculature: From the Clinic to the Micro-environment1

Marion van Vliet, MD, Cornelis F. van Dijke, MD, PhD, Piotr A. Wielopolski, PhD, Timo L. M. ten Hagen, PhD, Jifke F. Veenland, PhD, Anda Preda, MD, Antonius J. Loeve, BSc, Alexander M. M. Eggermont, MD, PhD and Gabriel P. Krestin, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (M.v.V., C.F.v.D., P.A.W., J.F.V., A.P., A.J.L., G.P.K.), Surgical Oncology (T.L.M.t.H., A.M.M.E.), and Medical Informatics (J.F.V.), Erasmus MC–University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received February 28, 2005; revision requested April 11 and received May 25; accepted May 31. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose.


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.  Diagrams show the stages of tumor-induced angiogenesis. When the tumor reaches a diameter of 1–2 mm, its growth no longer can be sustained by the diffusion of nutrients from external vessels (top left). Growth factors (GF) are then produced by the tumor (top right) that induce external vessels to bud and form new branches (bottom left), which grow toward and into the tumor (bottom right).

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a.  Digital photographs, obtained through a dorsal skin-fold window approximately 3 mm thick, show highly vascularized high-grade nonimmunogenic BN-175 soft-tissue sarcoma. (a) Dotted line indicates tumor circumference after 2 weeks of growth. (b) Magnified gray-scale view shows chaotic intratumoral vasculature and feeding vessels.

 


View larger version (136K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b.  Digital photographs, obtained through a dorsal skin-fold window approximately 3 mm thick, show highly vascularized high-grade nonimmunogenic BN-175 soft-tissue sarcoma. (a) Dotted line indicates tumor circumference after 2 weeks of growth. (b) Magnified gray-scale view shows chaotic intratumoral vasculature and feeding vessels.

 


View larger version (78K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms obtained for monitoring of treatment response in experimental (a, b) and clinical (c, d) settings. (a, b) Volumetric reconstructions of MR image data obtained with a T1-weighted 3D sequence after the administration of a blood pool contrast agent show sarcoma in a rat limb before (a) and after (b) administration of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} combined with melphalan in a closed-loop system to destroy the vascular bed. Note the considerably decreased enhancement in the tumor in b. (c, d) Arterial phase MR angiograms show tumor vessels in the ankle of a patient before (c) and after (d) systemic treatment similar to that administered in the rat tumor model. Note the enhancement of the tumor vessels in c (arrowhead), and the absence of enhancement in d despite heating of the foot in a warm bath before imaging. The treatment was considered successful.

 


View larger version (49K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms obtained for monitoring of treatment response in experimental (a, b) and clinical (c, d) settings. (a, b) Volumetric reconstructions of MR image data obtained with a T1-weighted 3D sequence after the administration of a blood pool contrast agent show sarcoma in a rat limb before (a) and after (b) administration of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} combined with melphalan in a closed-loop system to destroy the vascular bed. Note the considerably decreased enhancement in the tumor in b. (c, d) Arterial phase MR angiograms show tumor vessels in the ankle of a patient before (c) and after (d) systemic treatment similar to that administered in the rat tumor model. Note the enhancement of the tumor vessels in c (arrowhead), and the absence of enhancement in d despite heating of the foot in a warm bath before imaging. The treatment was considered successful.

 


View larger version (87K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3c.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms obtained for monitoring of treatment response in experimental (a, b) and clinical (c, d) settings. (a, b) Volumetric reconstructions of MR image data obtained with a T1-weighted 3D sequence after the administration of a blood pool contrast agent show sarcoma in a rat limb before (a) and after (b) administration of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} combined with melphalan in a closed-loop system to destroy the vascular bed. Note the considerably decreased enhancement in the tumor in b. (c, d) Arterial phase MR angiograms show tumor vessels in the ankle of a patient before (c) and after (d) systemic treatment similar to that administered in the rat tumor model. Note the enhancement of the tumor vessels in c (arrowhead), and the absence of enhancement in d despite heating of the foot in a warm bath before imaging. The treatment was considered successful.

 


View larger version (93K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3d.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiograms obtained for monitoring of treatment response in experimental (a, b) and clinical (c, d) settings. (a, b) Volumetric reconstructions of MR image data obtained with a T1-weighted 3D sequence after the administration of a blood pool contrast agent show sarcoma in a rat limb before (a) and after (b) administration of tumor necrosis factor {alpha} combined with melphalan in a closed-loop system to destroy the vascular bed. Note the considerably decreased enhancement in the tumor in b. (c, d) Arterial phase MR angiograms show tumor vessels in the ankle of a patient before (c) and after (d) systemic treatment similar to that administered in the rat tumor model. Note the enhancement of the tumor vessels in c (arrowhead), and the absence of enhancement in d despite heating of the foot in a warm bath before imaging. The treatment was considered successful.

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4.  Diagrams show the difference in permeability between normal vessels (left) and tumor vessels (right). Extracellular contrast agents (top row, small dots) leak into the interstitium from both normal vessels and tumor vessels because of the small size of the molecules in these agents, and this leakage causes contrast enhancement in the vessels and surrounding tissues. Blood pool contrast agents (bottom row, large dots), with a larger molecular size, remain inside normal vessels. Tumor vessel walls, which contain larger gaps than do normal vessel walls, allow blood pool contrast agents to leak into the interstitium.

 


View larger version (210K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5a.  Comparison of tumor delineation and vessel enhancement between an MR image obtained with a macromolecular contrast agent, albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 (a), and an MR image obtained with a combination of albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 and a small-molecular agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Schering) (b). In b, massive extravasation of gadopentetate dimeglumine is visible, and the depiction of the internally fragmented tumor is improved.

 


View larger version (205K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5b.  Comparison of tumor delineation and vessel enhancement between an MR image obtained with a macromolecular contrast agent, albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 (a), and an MR image obtained with a combination of albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 and a small-molecular agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Schering) (b). In b, massive extravasation of gadopentetate dimeglumine is visible, and the depiction of the internally fragmented tumor is improved.

 


View larger version (155K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6a.  Tumor at 2 weeks after implantation in a rat limb. (a) High-resolution T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image depicts only the mass. (b) Three-dimensional volume-rendered MR image, obtained with a T1-weighted sequence (field of view, 4 cm) after administration of the blood pool contrast agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45, shows high-signal-intensity vessels surrounding the tumor (arrow), which was artificially enhanced with postprocessing to better show its position with regard to the vasculature.

 


View larger version (169K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6b.  Tumor at 2 weeks after implantation in a rat limb. (a) High-resolution T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR image depicts only the mass. (b) Three-dimensional volume-rendered MR image, obtained with a T1-weighted sequence (field of view, 4 cm) after administration of the blood pool contrast agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45, shows high-signal-intensity vessels surrounding the tumor (arrow), which was artificially enhanced with postprocessing to better show its position with regard to the vasculature.

 


View larger version (170K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7a.  Increased vascularity associated with soft-tissue sarcoma in the left leg of a patient. (a–e) Sequential 3D MR angiograms obtained with gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement of the vasculature and the tumor at five time points from the peak arterial phase to the venous phase. Greater vessel density around the tumor borders in the affected leg is attributable to vessel recruitment by the tumor. (f) Subtraction image (unenhanced image minus late-phase contrast-enhanced image) from T1-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging shows marked enhancement of the tumor border and minimal enhancement of the tumor center.

 


View larger version (181K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7b.  Increased vascularity associated with soft-tissue sarcoma in the left leg of a patient. (a–e) Sequential 3D MR angiograms obtained with gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement of the vasculature and the tumor at five time points from the peak arterial phase to the venous phase. Greater vessel density around the tumor borders in the affected leg is attributable to vessel recruitment by the tumor. (f) Subtraction image (unenhanced image minus late-phase contrast-enhanced image) from T1-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging shows marked enhancement of the tumor border and minimal enhancement of the tumor center.

 


View larger version (182K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7c.  Increased vascularity associated with soft-tissue sarcoma in the left leg of a patient. (a–e) Sequential 3D MR angiograms obtained with gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement of the vasculature and the tumor at five time points from the peak arterial phase to the venous phase. Greater vessel density around the tumor borders in the affected leg is attributable to vessel recruitment by the tumor. (f) Subtraction image (unenhanced image minus late-phase contrast-enhanced image) from T1-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging shows marked enhancement of the tumor border and minimal enhancement of the tumor center.

 


View larger version (180K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7d.  Increased vascularity associated with soft-tissue sarcoma in the left leg of a patient. (a–e) Sequential 3D MR angiograms obtained with gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement of the vasculature and the tumor at five time points from the peak arterial phase to the venous phase. Greater vessel density around the tumor borders in the affected leg is attributable to vessel recruitment by the tumor. (f) Subtraction image (unenhanced image minus late-phase contrast-enhanced image) from T1-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging shows marked enhancement of the tumor border and minimal enhancement of the tumor center.

 


View larger version (178K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7e.  Increased vascularity associated with soft-tissue sarcoma in the left leg of a patient. (a–e) Sequential 3D MR angiograms obtained with gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement of the vasculature and the tumor at five time points from the peak arterial phase to the venous phase. Greater vessel density around the tumor borders in the affected leg is attributable to vessel recruitment by the tumor. (f) Subtraction image (unenhanced image minus late-phase contrast-enhanced image) from T1-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging shows marked enhancement of the tumor border and minimal enhancement of the tumor center.

 


View larger version (153K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7f.  Increased vascularity associated with soft-tissue sarcoma in the left leg of a patient. (a–e) Sequential 3D MR angiograms obtained with gadopentetate dimeglumine show enhancement of the vasculature and the tumor at five time points from the peak arterial phase to the venous phase. Greater vessel density around the tumor borders in the affected leg is attributable to vessel recruitment by the tumor. (f) Subtraction image (unenhanced image minus late-phase contrast-enhanced image) from T1-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging shows marked enhancement of the tumor border and minimal enhancement of the tumor center.

 


View larger version (137K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 8a.  Increased vascularity related to soft-tissue sarcoma. (a) Arterial phase MR angiogram obtained with gadopentetate dimeglumine shows enhanced vessels that surround a large unenhanced tumor in the neck of a patient. (b) T1-weighted image, obtained after MR angiography, shows the enhanced tumor.

 


View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 8b.  Increased vascularity related to soft-tissue sarcoma. (a) Arterial phase MR angiogram obtained with gadopentetate dimeglumine shows enhanced vessels that surround a large unenhanced tumor in the neck of a patient. (b) T1-weighted image, obtained after MR angiography, shows the enhanced tumor.

 


View larger version (74K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 9a.  MR angiograms obtained after the administration of albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 show sarcomas in the thigh in two different rats 2 weeks after implantation. The tumor size and contrast enhancement pattern in a differs markedly from that in b, although the same tumor model was used.

 


View larger version (86K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 9b.  MR angiograms obtained after the administration of albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 show sarcomas in the thigh in two different rats 2 weeks after implantation. The tumor size and contrast enhancement pattern in a differs markedly from that in b, although the same tumor model was used.

 


View larger version (163K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 10a.  (a) Arterial phase MR angiogram, obtained after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine, shows a soft-tissue sarcoma and related vasculature. Partial blockage of a venous segment (arrow) just below the enhancing tumor may be due to clotting. An arterial blockage proximal to the tumor (obscured in this projection) also was observed. (b) Axial T2-weighted MR image provides better delineation of the tumor.

 


View larger version (87K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 10b.  (a) Arterial phase MR angiogram, obtained after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine, shows a soft-tissue sarcoma and related vasculature. Partial blockage of a venous segment (arrow) just below the enhancing tumor may be due to clotting. An arterial blockage proximal to the tumor (obscured in this projection) also was observed. (b) Axial T2-weighted MR image provides better delineation of the tumor.

 


View larger version (92K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 11a.  MR angiograms obtained in the arm of a patient during the arterial phase (a) and the venous phase (b) illustrate the advantages of performing MR angiography at different time points after contrast material administration. Whereas a shows no tumor, b clearly depicts a tumor (arrow) in the forearm.

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 11b.  MR angiograms obtained in the arm of a patient during the arterial phase (a) and the venous phase (b) illustrate the advantages of performing MR angiography at different time points after contrast material administration. Whereas a shows no tumor, b clearly depicts a tumor (arrow) in the forearm.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 12a.  Diagrams show the position (a) and use (b) of the skin-fold window model in a rat. In b, the processes of tumor implantation (left), tumor growth (middle), and coil positioning for MR imaging (right) are shown. A flap of skin was removed and sandwiched between two frames, and the skin and frames were fixed in place with sutures. Before the surgical site was closed, a small piece of tumor (0.1 mm3) was implanted. The window was then closed with the insertion of an 18-mm-diameter layer of microscopic cover glass on both sides of the implantation site, and the tumor was allowed to grow. For high-resolution MR imaging (MR angiography), a 1- or 2-cm loop receiver antenna was placed on the window to obtain resolution of 60 x 60 x 100-µm and 40 x 40 x 100-µm interpolated voxels, respectively, with examination times of less than 20 minutes on a clinical 3.0-T MR imager. In this way, high-resolution MR angiography with use of a blood pool contrast agent can be performed over the course of several days to monitor tumor growth and angiogenesis.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 12b.  Diagrams show the position (a) and use (b) of the skin-fold window model in a rat. In b, the processes of tumor implantation (left), tumor growth (middle), and coil positioning for MR imaging (right) are shown. A flap of skin was removed and sandwiched between two frames, and the skin and frames were fixed in place with sutures. Before the surgical site was closed, a small piece of tumor (0.1 mm3) was implanted. The window was then closed with the insertion of an 18-mm-diameter layer of microscopic cover glass on both sides of the implantation site, and the tumor was allowed to grow. For high-resolution MR imaging (MR angiography), a 1- or 2-cm loop receiver antenna was placed on the window to obtain resolution of 60 x 60 x 100-µm and 40 x 40 x 100-µm interpolated voxels, respectively, with examination times of less than 20 minutes on a clinical 3.0-T MR imager. In this way, high-resolution MR angiography with use of a blood pool contrast agent can be performed over the course of several days to monitor tumor growth and angiogenesis.

 


View larger version (126K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 13a.  MR and optical images of a tumor in a skin-fold window model in a rat. Digital photograph (a) and comparable high-resolution MR angiogram obtained with the blood pool contrast agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 (b) show tumor vasculature 2 weeks after implantation. Often, as in b, the tumor is not optimally depicted against the background on MR angiograms obtained with a blood pool agent, and gadopentetate dimeglumine is added to improve tumor delineation, as in c.

 


View larger version (146K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 13b.  MR and optical images of a tumor in a skin-fold window model in a rat. Digital photograph (a) and comparable high-resolution MR angiogram obtained with the blood pool contrast agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 (b) show tumor vasculature 2 weeks after implantation. Often, as in b, the tumor is not optimally depicted against the background on MR angiograms obtained with a blood pool agent, and gadopentetate dimeglumine is added to improve tumor delineation, as in c.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 13c.  MR and optical images of a tumor in a skin-fold window model in a rat. Digital photograph (a) and comparable high-resolution MR angiogram obtained with the blood pool contrast agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 (b) show tumor vasculature 2 weeks after implantation. Often, as in b, the tumor is not optimally depicted against the background on MR angiograms obtained with a blood pool agent, and gadopentetate dimeglumine is added to improve tumor delineation, as in c.

 


View larger version (150K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 14a.  Image series obtained with high-resolution MR angiography and the blood pool agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 over the course of 2 weeks in the skin-fold window model in a rat. Maximum intensity projections show development of the tumor and tumor feeding vessels at day 1 (tumor diameter, approximately 3 mm) (a), day 3 (tumor diameter, approximately 7 mm) (b), and day 7 (tumor diameter, approximately 11 mm) (c).

 


View larger version (140K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 14b.  Image series obtained with high-resolution MR angiography and the blood pool agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 over the course of 2 weeks in the skin-fold window model in a rat. Maximum intensity projections show development of the tumor and tumor feeding vessels at day 1 (tumor diameter, approximately 3 mm) (a), day 3 (tumor diameter, approximately 7 mm) (b), and day 7 (tumor diameter, approximately 11 mm) (c).

 


View larger version (134K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 14c.  Image series obtained with high-resolution MR angiography and the blood pool agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 over the course of 2 weeks in the skin-fold window model in a rat. Maximum intensity projections show development of the tumor and tumor feeding vessels at day 1 (tumor diameter, approximately 3 mm) (a), day 3 (tumor diameter, approximately 7 mm) (b), and day 7 (tumor diameter, approximately 11 mm) (c).

 


View larger version (172K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 15a.  (a) High-resolution MR angiogram (maximum intensity projection) obtained with the blood pool agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 and with a 1-cm loop receiver coil on a 3.0-T clinical MR imager shows a tumor 11/2 weeks after implantation in a skin-fold window model in a mouse. (b–d) Magnification of the maximum intensity projection image enables a comparison of vessels depicted on the MR angiogram (b) with those depicted on an optical photomicrograph (c) and fluorescence photomicrograph (d).

 


View larger version (124K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 15b.  (a) High-resolution MR angiogram (maximum intensity projection) obtained with the blood pool agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 and with a 1-cm loop receiver coil on a 3.0-T clinical MR imager shows a tumor 11/2 weeks after implantation in a skin-fold window model in a mouse. (b–d) Magnification of the maximum intensity projection image enables a comparison of vessels depicted on the MR angiogram (b) with those depicted on an optical photomicrograph (c) and fluorescence photomicrograph (d).

 


View larger version (133K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 15c.  (a) High-resolution MR angiogram (maximum intensity projection) obtained with the blood pool agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 and with a 1-cm loop receiver coil on a 3.0-T clinical MR imager shows a tumor 11/2 weeks after implantation in a skin-fold window model in a mouse. (b–d) Magnification of the maximum intensity projection image enables a comparison of vessels depicted on the MR angiogram (b) with those depicted on an optical photomicrograph (c) and fluorescence photomicrograph (d).

 


View larger version (130K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 15d.  (a) High-resolution MR angiogram (maximum intensity projection) obtained with the blood pool agent albumin-(Gd-DTPA)45 and with a 1-cm loop receiver coil on a 3.0-T clinical MR imager shows a tumor 11/2 weeks after implantation in a skin-fold window model in a mouse. (b–d) Magnification of the maximum intensity projection image enables a comparison of vessels depicted on the MR angiogram (b) with those depicted on an optical photomicrograph (c) and fluorescence photomicrograph (d).

 


View larger version (154K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 16a.  Digital photograph (a), confocal fluorescence photomicrograph (b), and volume-rendered MR angiogram (c) show similar morphologic features of tumor-related vasculature at the center (solid arrow) and periphery (open arrow) of a skin-fold window model. The close correlation between images from the different modalities indicates that noninvasive quantification of angiogenesis may be possible in the future with MR imaging.

 


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 16b.  Digital photograph (a), confocal fluorescence photomicrograph (b), and volume-rendered MR angiogram (c) show similar morphologic features of tumor-related vasculature at the center (solid arrow) and periphery (open arrow) of a skin-fold window model. The close correlation between images from the different modalities indicates that noninvasive quantification of angiogenesis may be possible in the future with MR imaging.

 


View larger version (154K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 16c.  Digital photograph (a), confocal fluorescence photomicrograph (b), and volume-rendered MR angiogram (c) show similar morphologic features of tumor-related vasculature at the center (solid arrow) and periphery (open arrow) of a skin-fold window model. The close correlation between images from the different modalities indicates that noninvasive quantification of angiogenesis may be possible in the future with MR imaging.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.