RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.241025144
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rhim, H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rhim, H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vascular and/or Interventional Radiology
Right arrow Gastrointestinal Radiology

Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation of Abdominal Tumors: Lessons Learned from Complications1

Hyunchul Rhim, MD, Gerald D. Dodd, III, MD, Kedar N. Chintapalli, MD, Bradford J. Wood, MD, Damian E. Dupuy, MD, Julia L. Hvizda, RN, Patrick E. Sewell, MD and S. Nahum Goldberg, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hanyang University Hospital, 17 Haengdang-Dong, Sungdong-Ku, 133–792 Seoul, Korea (H.R.); the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (G.D.D., K.N.C.); the Special Procedures Division, Diagnostic Radiology Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (B.J.W., J.L.H.); the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI (D.E.D.); the Department of Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss (P.E.S.); and the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass (S.N.G.). Recipient of a Magna Cum Laude award for an education exhibit at the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received August 29, 2002; revision requested November 20; final revision received July 7, 2003; accepted July 7. G.D.D. is a stockholder in Rita Medical Systems, Mountain View, Calif. Address correspondence to H.R. (e-mail: rhimhc@hanyang.ac.kr).



View larger version (114K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1a.  RF-induced thermal damage to adjacent organs from liver RF ablation in a pig model. (a) Photograph of the gross specimen shows a large area of coagulation (solid arrows) that extends to involve the entire thickness of the gallbladder wall (open arrow). This type of injury could potentially lead to perforation or cholecystitis. (b) Clinical photograph shows thermal damage to the stomach (open arrow) adjacent to the ablated area (solid arrows). This type of injury could potentially lead to perforation of the gastrointestinal lumen.

 


View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1b.  RF-induced thermal damage to adjacent organs from liver RF ablation in a pig model. (a) Photograph of the gross specimen shows a large area of coagulation (solid arrows) that extends to involve the entire thickness of the gallbladder wall (open arrow). This type of injury could potentially lead to perforation or cholecystitis. (b) Clinical photograph shows thermal damage to the stomach (open arrow) adjacent to the ablated area (solid arrows). This type of injury could potentially lead to perforation of the gastrointestinal lumen.

 


View larger version (173K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2a.  Grounding pad burns following 10 minutes of high-current RF ablation in a pig model. (a) Clinical photograph demonstrates second-degree burns with blister formation along the edge of the pad closest to the electrode, particularly at the corners of the pad (curved arrows). Mild red streaking representing a first-degree burn is seen at the distal edge of the pad (straight arrows). (b) Clinical photograph demonstrates a third-degree burn (solid arrows) with a central eschar (open arrows). This full-thickness skin burn was produced by reducing grounding pad contact to a 2 x 3-cm area during RF ablation at 1,000 mA (50 W).

 


View larger version (120K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2b.  Grounding pad burns following 10 minutes of high-current RF ablation in a pig model. (a) Clinical photograph demonstrates second-degree burns with blister formation along the edge of the pad closest to the electrode, particularly at the corners of the pad (curved arrows). Mild red streaking representing a first-degree burn is seen at the distal edge of the pad (straight arrows). (b) Clinical photograph demonstrates a third-degree burn (solid arrows) with a central eschar (open arrows). This full-thickness skin burn was produced by reducing grounding pad contact to a 2 x 3-cm area during RF ablation at 1,000 mA (50 W).

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.  Schematic illustrates the correct placement of grounding pads (gray rectangles) in relation to the electrode (left) for RF ablation. To minimize grounding pad burns, multiple pads should be placed horizontally, with their long axes oriented toward the electrode. The electrodes should be equidistant from the RF probe to facilitate a more even heat distribution and minimize deleterious heating along the grounding pad surface.

 


View larger version (156K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4a.  Massive arterial bleeding after liver RF ablation. (a) CT scan obtained prior to RF ablation shows a 2-cm metastatic nodule (arrow). (b) Follow-up CT scan obtained 2 hours after RF ablation shows a large hematoma in the right hepatic lobe (arrows). (c) Emergency angiogram shows brisk arterial bleeding from the hepatic artery (arrow). Embolization was performed to bring the bleeding under control. (d) Follow-up CT scan obtained 2 months after RF ablation shows a liquified subcapsular hematoma (arrows). Note the area of metal attenuation representing the embolization coil (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (164K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4b.  Massive arterial bleeding after liver RF ablation. (a) CT scan obtained prior to RF ablation shows a 2-cm metastatic nodule (arrow). (b) Follow-up CT scan obtained 2 hours after RF ablation shows a large hematoma in the right hepatic lobe (arrows). (c) Emergency angiogram shows brisk arterial bleeding from the hepatic artery (arrow). Embolization was performed to bring the bleeding under control. (d) Follow-up CT scan obtained 2 months after RF ablation shows a liquified subcapsular hematoma (arrows). Note the area of metal attenuation representing the embolization coil (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (182K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4c.  Massive arterial bleeding after liver RF ablation. (a) CT scan obtained prior to RF ablation shows a 2-cm metastatic nodule (arrow). (b) Follow-up CT scan obtained 2 hours after RF ablation shows a large hematoma in the right hepatic lobe (arrows). (c) Emergency angiogram shows brisk arterial bleeding from the hepatic artery (arrow). Embolization was performed to bring the bleeding under control. (d) Follow-up CT scan obtained 2 months after RF ablation shows a liquified subcapsular hematoma (arrows). Note the area of metal attenuation representing the embolization coil (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (169K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4d.  Massive arterial bleeding after liver RF ablation. (a) CT scan obtained prior to RF ablation shows a 2-cm metastatic nodule (arrow). (b) Follow-up CT scan obtained 2 hours after RF ablation shows a large hematoma in the right hepatic lobe (arrows). (c) Emergency angiogram shows brisk arterial bleeding from the hepatic artery (arrow). Embolization was performed to bring the bleeding under control. (d) Follow-up CT scan obtained 2 months after RF ablation shows a liquified subcapsular hematoma (arrows). Note the area of metal attenuation representing the embolization coil (arrowhead).

 


View larger version (151K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5a.  Diaphragmatic injury after liver RF ablation. (a) Follow-up CT scan obtained 1 day after RF ablation demonstrates two ablated lesions representing metastatic nodules in the right hepatic lobe (arrows). The patient experienced right shoulder pain for 3 months. (b) Follow-up CT scan obtained 1 month after RF ablation shows focal thickening of the diaphragm adjacent to the ablated area (arrow).

 


View larger version (139K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5b.  Diaphragmatic injury after liver RF ablation. (a) Follow-up CT scan obtained 1 day after RF ablation demonstrates two ablated lesions representing metastatic nodules in the right hepatic lobe (arrows). The patient experienced right shoulder pain for 3 months. (b) Follow-up CT scan obtained 1 month after RF ablation shows focal thickening of the diaphragm adjacent to the ablated area (arrow).

 


View larger version (113K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6a.  Hepatic abscess formation after liver RF ablation. (a) US image obtained prior to RF ablation shows a hypoechoic mass (cursors and arrows) in the left lateral segment of the liver. The patient complained of prolonged fever for 1 week after undergoing ablation. (b) Follow-up CT scan shows a gas-containing abscess (arrows). The patient’s condition improved after aspiration of pus from the abscess cavity.

 


View larger version (122K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6b.  Hepatic abscess formation after liver RF ablation. (a) US image obtained prior to RF ablation shows a hypoechoic mass (cursors and arrows) in the left lateral segment of the liver. The patient complained of prolonged fever for 1 week after undergoing ablation. (b) Follow-up CT scan shows a gas-containing abscess (arrows). The patient’s condition improved after aspiration of pus from the abscess cavity.

 


View larger version (164K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7.  Tumor seeding after RF ablation of a metastatic liver nodule. CT scan shows a focal enhancing nodule in the subcutaneous area near the abdominal wall (arrow), a location that corresponds to the puncture site of the RF electrode.

 


View larger version (167K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 8a.  Tumor seeding in the peritoneal cavity after RF ablation of a metastatic liver nodule. (a) Follow-up CT scan obtained 1 day after RF ablation shows the ablated area with peritumoral hyperemia (arrow) in the left lateral segment of the liver. (b) Follow-up CT scan obtained 6 months later shows multiple extrahepatic and intraperitoneal tumor nodules (arrows) just below the site of ablation.

 


View larger version (169K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 8b.  Tumor seeding in the peritoneal cavity after RF ablation of a metastatic liver nodule. (a) Follow-up CT scan obtained 1 day after RF ablation shows the ablated area with peritumoral hyperemia (arrow) in the left lateral segment of the liver. (b) Follow-up CT scan obtained 6 months later shows multiple extrahepatic and intraperitoneal tumor nodules (arrows) just below the site of ablation.

 


View larger version (138K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 9.  Real-time imaging-guided monitoring. US image obtained during ablation of a renal tumor shows how imaging-guided monitoring can prevent injury to adjacent bowel loops.

 


View larger version (169K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 10.  Hematuria after laparoscopic RF ablation of a renal tumor. CT scan demonstrates an ablated central tumor (arrow) that touches the collecting system. Hematuria developed but was self-limiting and transient, resolving 2 hours after the procedure. Although postprocedural hematuria is uncommon, central lesions carry greater risk than peripheral lesions for this complication.

 


View larger version (185K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 11a.  Perinephric hematoma after renal RF ablation. (a, b) Unenhanced (a) and contrast material-enhanced (b) CT scans obtained shortly after RF ablation demonstrate a large perinephric hematoma (arrow). (c) Follow-up CT scan obtained 5 months later shows the hematoma with mild interval shrinkage and a second tumor on the contralateral kidney (arrow).

 


View larger version (180K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 11b.  Perinephric hematoma after renal RF ablation. (a, b) Unenhanced (a) and contrast material-enhanced (b) CT scans obtained shortly after RF ablation demonstrate a large perinephric hematoma (arrow). (c) Follow-up CT scan obtained 5 months later shows the hematoma with mild interval shrinkage and a second tumor on the contralateral kidney (arrow).

 


View larger version (104K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 11c.  Perinephric hematoma after renal RF ablation. (a, b) Unenhanced (a) and contrast material-enhanced (b) CT scans obtained shortly after RF ablation demonstrate a large perinephric hematoma (arrow). (c) Follow-up CT scan obtained 5 months later shows the hematoma with mild interval shrinkage and a second tumor on the contralateral kidney (arrow).

 


View larger version (181K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 12.  Abscess formation after adrenal RF ablation. MR image obtained 11 weeks after ablation shows an abscess (arrow) in the focal area of coagulation in a paraspinal metastatic lesion from adrenocortical carcinoma.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.