RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online October 3, 2003, 10.1148/rg.e18

(RadioGraphics 2004;24:e18.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow MPEG movies
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
e18v1
24/1/e18    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geenen, R. W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Krestin, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geenen, R. W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Krestin, G. P.
© RSNA, 2003

Online Only

CT and MR Colonography: Scanning Techniques, Postprocessing, and Emphasis on Polyp Detection1

Remy W. F. Geenen, MD, Shahid M. Hussain, MD, PhD, Filippo Cademartiri, MD, Jan-Werner Poley, MD, Peter D. Siersema, MD, PhD and Gabriel P. Krestin, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.W.F.G., S.M.H., F.C, G.P.K.) and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (J.W.P., P.D.S.), Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Parma, Parma, Italy (F.C.). Presented as an educational exhibit at the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 29, 2003, revision requested July 11, revision received and accepted August 13. Address correspondence to R.W.F.G. (e-mail: r.geenen@erasmusmc.nl).

In the last decade, computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) colonography, two new cross-sectional techniques for imaging of the colon, emerged. Both techniques show promising initial results in the detection of polyps equal to or greater than 1 cm in diameter in symptomatic patients. Imaging protocols are still mostly under development and prone to change. Both CT and MR colonography generate a large number of source images, which have to be read carefully for filling defects and, if intravenous contrast material is used, enhancing lesions. An important postprocessing technique is multiplanar reformatting, which allows the viewer to see potential lesions in an orientation other than that of the source images. Virtual endoscopy, a volume rendering technique that generates images from within the colon lumen, is used for problem solving. CT and MR colonography have potential advantages over colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema examination: multiplanar capabilities, detection of enhancing lesions that make the distinction between fecal residue and true lesion possible, and ante- and retrograde virtual colonoscopy. Currently, a number of studies suggest that patients have a preference for CT colonography over colonoscopy. Patients consider bowel cleansing the most uncomfortable part of any colon examination; hence, from the acceptance point of view, fecal tagging techniques are promising. Before CT and MR colonography can be implemented in daily practice, they must show approximately the same accuracy as colonoscopy for polyp detection in both symptomatic and screening patients.

© RSNA, 2003

Index Terms: Colon, MR, 75.121411, 75.121412, 75.121419, 75.12143 • Colon, CT, 75.12115, 75.12117 • Colon neoplasms, 75.30 • Magnetic resonance (MR), three-dimensional, 75.12143, 75.12149




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
C. A Kuehle, J. Langhorst, S. C Ladd, T. Zoepf, M. Nuefer, F. Grabellus, J. Barkhausen, G. Gerken, and T. C Lauenstein
Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population
Gut, August 1, 2007; 56(8): 1079 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. A. Kuehle, P. Veit, G. Antoch, F. Grabellus, P. Robert, T. Beyer, and C. U. Herborn
Contrast-Enhanced Dark Lumen PET/CT and MR Colonography in a Rodent Polyp Model: Initial Results with Histopathologic Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 1045 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
B. P. Mulhall, G. R. Veerappan, and J. L. Jackson
Meta-Analysis: Computed Tomographic Colonography
Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 635 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. A. Barish, J. A. Soto, and J. T. Ferrucci
Consensus on Current Clinical Practice of Virtual Colonoscopy
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2005; 184(3): 786 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2003 by the Radiological Society of North America.