RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.286085504
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Potter, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chandrasekhar, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Potter, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chandrasekhar, C. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetric/Gynecologic Radiology
Right arrow Ultrasound
Right arrow Computed Tomography
Right arrow Emergency Radiology
RadioGraphics 2008;28:1645-1659
© RSNA, 2008

US and CT Evaluation of Acute Pelvic Pain of Gynecologic Origin in Nonpregnant Premenopausal Patients1

Andrew W. Potter, MD and Chitra A. Chandrasekhar, MBBS

1 From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 5656 Kelley St, Houston, TX 77026. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2007 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received January 30, 2008; revision requested March 14 and received April 1; accepted April 7. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to A.W.P. (e-mail: Andrew.W.Potter{at}uth.tmc.edu).

The interpretation of imaging findings in the premenopausal patient with acute pelvic pain is influenced by knowledge of the physiologic changes that occur in the pelvis as well as by the patient’s clinical history. Although ultrasonography (US) is the modality of choice for initial imaging, gynecologic disease is detected or suspected with increasing frequency at computed tomography (CT) because of the increasing availability and use of this modality. As a result, the recognition of common features of gynecologic entities on both US and CT images is essential for prompt diagnosis and expeditious management. Categorizing lesions according to their anatomic location, physiologic or pathologic origin, and internal characteristics (cystic, solid, or mixed) allows efficient and accurate diagnosis.

© RSNA, 2008







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.