RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.275065107
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bogot, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Admon, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bogot, N. R.
Right arrow Articles by Admon, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac Radiology
Right arrow Computed Tomography
RadioGraphics 2007;27:1297-1309
© RSNA, 2007


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Cardiac CT of the Transplanted Heart: Indications, Technique, Appearance, and Complications1

Naama R. Bogot, MD, Ronen Durst, MD, Dorith Shaham, MD, and Dan Admon, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (N.R.B., D.S.) and Cardiology (R.D., D.A.), Hadassah–Hebrew University Medical Center, POB 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2005 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received May 30, 2006; revision requested January 9, 2007, and received February 5; accepted February 8. Supported in part by a grant from Hadassah–Hebrew University Medical Center. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to N.R.B. (e-mail: naamab{at}hadassah.org.il).

Effective antirejection therapy and infection control have significantly improved the long-term survival of heart transplant recipients, but coronary allograft vasculopathy remains an important limiting factor. Most heart transplant recipients undergo annual coronary angiography for the detection of allograft vasculopathy, which is often clinically silent. Angiography allows detection of vasculopathy only indirectly, with depiction of the lumen, and does not depict the wall thickening and intimal hyperplasia that typify this disease; the procedure also is invasive and is associated with a 1%–2% risk of complication. In contrast, electrocardiographically gated multidetector computed tomography (CT) can provide a comprehensive and noninvasive evaluation of the transplanted heart in a single study. Cardiac CT enables evaluation of the coronary artery lumen and wall and thus may be used for screening, diagnosis, grading, and follow-up of coronary allograft vasculopathy. It also may be used to detect other posttransplantation complications, such as malignancy and infection, and to assess cardiac and vascular anastomoses and cardiac function. However, special strategies may be needed to reduce the transplant heart rate so as to obtain images of diagnostic quality.

© RSNA, 2007







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.