HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME Test (opens in a new window) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Youk, J. H. Articles by Oh, K. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Youk, J. H. Articles by Oh, K. K. Related Collections Breast (Imaging and Interventional) Ultrasound Oncologic Imaging

Missed Breast Cancers at US-guided Core Needle Biopsy: How to Reduce Them¹

¹ From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-ku, Shinchon-dong 134, Seoul 120-752, South Korea. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2005 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received March 17, 2006; revision requested May 26; final revision received September 5; accepted September 6. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to E.-K.K. (e-mail: ekkim{at}yumc.yonsei.ac.kr).

Ultrasonographically (US) guided core needle biopsy is currently recognized as a reliable alternative to surgical biopsy for the histopathologic diagnosis of breast lesions. However, despite advances in biopsy devices and techniques, false-negative diagnoses are unavoidable and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. The most common reasons for false-negative diagnosis are (a) technical or sampling errors, (b) failure to recognize or act on radiologic-histologic discordance, and (c) lack of imaging follow-up after a benign biopsy result. Technical difficulties (eg, poor lesion or needle visualization, deeply located lesions, dense fibrotic tissue) cause inaccurate sampling but can be reduced by using modified standard techniques. Radiologic-histologic correlation is also of critical importance in US-guided core needle biopsy. Radiologic-histologic discordance occurs when the histologic results do not provide a sufficient explanation for the imaging features and indicates that the lesion may not have been sampled adequately, so that repeat biopsy is warranted. Appropriate follow-up imaging is invaluable; even patients with concordant benign findings after US-guided core needle biopsy are directed to undergo follow-up imaging because there may be delays in the recognition of false-negative findings. Optimization of technique, radiologic-histologic correlation, and postbiopsy follow-up protocols are recommended to reduce the occurrence of false-negative diagnosis at US-guided core needle biopsy performed by radiologists.

© RSNA, 2007

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. H. Youk, E.-K. Kim, M. J. Kim, and K. K. Oh Sonographically Guided 14-Gauge Core Needle Biopsy of Breast Masses: A Review of 2,420 Cases with Long-Term Follow-Up Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 202 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Singh, S. Sethi, M. Raber, and L. A. Petersen Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future Directions J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 25(31): 5009 - 5018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Doshi, D. E. March, G. M. Crisi, and B. F. Coughlin Complex Cystic Breast Masses: Diagnostic Approach and Imaging-Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S53 - S64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]