HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME Test (opens in a new window) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Douglas-Akinwande, A. C. Articles by Choplin, R. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Douglas-Akinwande, A. C. Articles by Choplin, R. H. Related Collections Computed Tomography Musculoskeletal Radiology Neuroradiology

Multichannel CT: Evaluating the Spine in Postoperative Patients with Orthopedic Hardware¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Indiana University Medical Center, University Hospital 0279, 550 N University Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46202. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2005 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received April 3, 2006; revision requested June 23 and received July 14; accepted July 24. A.C.D.A., K.A.B., J.R., and R.H.C. supported by educational grants from Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, Ohio; J.L.R. is a member of the Philips CT Medical Advisory Board, Cleveland, Ohio; and A.C.D.A. is a consultant with Bracco Diagnostics, Princeton, NJ. Address correspondence to A.C.D.A. (e-mail: andougla{at}iupui.edu).

Evaluating the spine in patients with metal orthopedic hardware is challenging. Although the effectiveness of conventional computed tomography (CT) can be limited by severe beam-hardening artifacts, the evolution of multichannel CT in recent years has made available new techniques that can help minimize these artifacts. Multichannel CT allows faster scanning times, resulting in reduced motion artifacts; thinner sections, with which it is possible to create a scanned volume of isotropic voxels with equivalent image resolution in all planes; and the generation of a higher x-ray tube current, which may result in better penetration of metal hardware and reduction of artifacts. Although 140 kVp and high milliamperage-second exposure are recommended for imaging patients with hardware, caution should always be exercised, particularly in children, young adults, and patients undergoing multiple examinations. The acquisition of multiplanar reformatted images in the axial, sagittal, coronal, and oblique planes and of three-dimensional volume-rendered images optimizes image interpretation. Wide window settings are best for reviewing images when hardware is present. The integrity of hardware is best assessed with multiplanar average intensity projection. Soft-tissue structures are best visualized by interactively varying the window width and level settings. Implementation of these techniques can yield diagnostic-quality images and aid in patient treatment.

© RSNA, 2006

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. J. CHURCH and T. G. ODLE Diagnosis and Treatment Of back Pain Radiol. Technol., November 1, 2007; 79(2): 126 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]