HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME Test (opens in a new window) Supplement Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rausch, D. R. Articles by Hendrick, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rausch, D. R. Articles by Hendrick, R. E. Related Collections Breast (Imaging and Interventional) Magnetic Resonance Imaging

How to Optimize Clinical Breast MR Imaging Practices and Techniques on Your 1.5-T System¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Box 1234, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 (D.R.R.); and Department of Radiology, Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (R.E.H.). Recipient of a Certificate of Merit award for an education exhibit at the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received September 21, 2005; revision requested January 4, 2006, and received January 31; accepted February 6. D.R.R. has been an educational speaker for Suros Surgical Systems, and R.E.H. is an educational speaker for GE Healthcare. Address correspondence to D.R.R. (e-mail: danarausch{at}hotmail.com).

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, when used in conjunction with mammography and ultrasonography, can be a powerful tool for breast imaging. There are various clinical scenarios in which MR imaging may provide key information that leads to an alteration in treatment plans (eg, by demonstrating features that were occult at physical examination or conventional imaging). Although many benign and malignant entities enhance at contrast material–enhanced breast MR imaging, the morphologic characteristics and kinetic profiles of lesions help narrow the differential diagnosis. To optimize the quality of the morphologic and kinetic information yielded by breast MR imaging, the radiologist must attend to various practical and technical prerequisites: A bilateral breast coil should be used with prone positioning of the patient. An MR imaging system with a high-field-strength magnet is needed, and the magnetic field must be homogeneous across the field of view, which should include both breasts. A T2-weighted sequence should be applied first to identify any cysts and should be followed by three-dimensional imaging with a T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequence after the intravenous administration of a gadolinium chelate. To minimize artifacts, a direction other than the anterior-posterior direction should be selected for phase encoding. To suppress the signal from fat, a frequency-selective pulse should be applied during imaging, or the unenhanced MR imaging data should be subtracted from the contrast-enhanced MR imaging data during postprocessing. The imaging section thickness should be 3 mm or less, the pixel size should be less than 1 mm in each in-plane direction, and the total acquisition time should be less than 2 minutes.

A patient questionnaire to supplement this article is available at http://radiographics.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/26/5/1469/DC1

© RSNA, 2006

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T-A HEUSNER, L S FREUDENBERG, H KUEHL, E A M HAUTH, P VEIT-HAIBACH, M FORSTING, A BOCKISCH, and G ANTOCH Whole-body PET/CT-mammography for staging breast cancer: initial results Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 743 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A. Heusner, S. Kuemmel, L. Umutlu, A. Koeninger, L. S. Freudenberg, E. A.M. Hauth, K. R. Kimmig, M. Forsting, A. Bockisch, and G. Antoch Breast Cancer Staging in a Single Session: Whole-Body PET/CT Mammography J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1215 - 1222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Harvey, R. E. Hendrick, J. M. Coll, B. T. Nicholson, B. T. Burkholder, and M. A. Cohen Breast MR Imaging Artifacts: How to Recognize and Fix Them RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S131 - S145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ojeda-Fournier, K. A. Choe, and M. C. Mahoney Recognizing and Interpreting Artifacts and Pitfalls in MR Imaging of the Breast RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S147 - S164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Causer, R. A. Jong, E. Warner, K. Hill, J. W. Wong, B. N. Curpen, and D. B. Plewes Breast Cancers Detected with Imaging Screening in the BRCA Population: Emphasis on MR Imaging with Histopathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S165 - S182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]