RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.263055186
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, P. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Computed Tomography
Right arrow General
Right arrow Physics and Basic Science
RadioGraphics 2006;26:905-922
© RSNA, 2006


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Volume Rendering versus Maximum Intensity Projection in CT Angiography: What Works Best, When, and Why1

Elliot K. Fishman, MD, Derek R. Ney, BS, David G. Heath, PhD, Frank M. Corl, MS, Karen M. Horton, MD and Pamela T. Johnson, MD

1 From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Room 3251, Baltimore, MD 21287 (E.K.F., D.G.H., F.M.C., K.M.H., P.T.J.); and HipGraphics, Towson, Md (D.R.N., D.G.H.). Presented as an education exhibit at the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received October 11, 2005; revision requested November 4 and received December 19; accepted December 20. D.G.H. and D.R.N. are founders of HipGraphics; D.G.H. is a consultant to HipGraphics; D.R.N. is a full-time employee of HipGraphics; E.K.F. is a co-founder of Hip-Graphics and a consultant to Siemens Medical Solutions and GE Healthcare; and the other authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to E.K.F. (e-mail: efishman{at}jhmi.edu).

The introduction and widespread availability of 16-section multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) technology and, more recently, 64-section scanners, has greatly advanced the role of CT angiography in clinical practice. CT angiography has become a key component of state-of-the-art imaging, with applications ranging from oncology (eg, staging of pancreatic or renal cancer) to classic vascular imaging (eg, evaluation of aortic aneurysms and renal artery stenoses) as well as newer techniques such as coronary artery imaging and peripheral runoff studies. With an average of 400–1000 images in each volume data set, three-dimensional postprocessing is crucial to volume visualization. Radiologists now have workstations that provide capabilities for evaluation of these data sets by using a range of software programs and processing tools. Although different systems have unique capabilities and functionality, all provide the options of volume rendering and maximum intensity projection for image display and analysis. These two postprocessing techniques have different advantages and disadvantages when used in clinical practice, and it is important that radiologists understand when and how each technique should be used.

© RSNA, 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. K. Fishman, K. M. Horton, and P. T. Johnson
Multidetector CT and Three-dimensional CT Angiography for Suspected Vascular Trauma of the Extremities
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 653 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Romijn, H.A.F. G. van Andel, M.A. van Walderveen, M.E. Sprengers, J.C. van Rijn, W.J. van Rooij, H.W. Venema, C.A. Grimbergen, G.J. den Heeten, and C.B. Majoie
Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Angiography with Matched Mask Bone Elimination for Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography and 3D Rotational Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 134 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2006 by the Radiological Society of North America.