HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhuo, J. Articles by Gullapalli, R. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhuo, J. Articles by Gullapalli, R. P. Related Collections Magnetic Resonance Imaging Physics and Basic Science

AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents

MR Artifacts, Safety, and Quality Control¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201. From the AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents at the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received June 27, 2005; revision requested September 16 and received October 13; accepted October 14. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to R.P.G. (e-mail: rgullapalli{at}umm.edu).

Artifacts in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging result from the complex interaction of contemporary imager subsystems, including the main magnet, gradient coils, radiofrequency (RF) transmitter and receiver, and reconstruction algorithm used. An understanding of the sources of artifacts enables optimization of the MR imaging system performance. The increasing clinical use of very high magnetic field strengths, high-performance gradients, and multiple RF channels also mandates renewed attention to the biologic effects and physical safety of MR imaging. Radiologists should be aware of the potential physiologic effects of prolonged exposure to magnetic fields, acoustic noise, and RF energy during MR imaging and should use all the available methods for avoiding accidents and adverse effects. Imaging equipment should be regularly tested and monitored to ensure its stability and the uniformity of its functioning. Newly installed or upgraded MR systems should be tested by a physicist or qualified engineer before use. In addition, the authors recommend participation in the MR imaging accreditation program of the American College of Radiology to establish the initial framework for an adequate quality assurance program, which then can be further developed to fulfill local institutional needs.

© RSNA, 2006

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Mai Pseudolayering artefact on postcontrast magnetic resonance images of the bladder of 18 dogs and three cats Vet Rec., July 26, 2008; 163(4): 117 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Saremi, J. D. Grizzard, and R. J. Kim Optimizing Cardiac MR Imaging: Practical Remedies for Artifacts RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 1161 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Harvey, R. E. Hendrick, J. M. Coll, B. T. Nicholson, B. T. Burkholder, and M. A. Cohen Breast MR Imaging Artifacts: How to Recognize and Fix Them RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S131 - S145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ojeda-Fournier, K. A. Choe, and M. C. Mahoney Recognizing and Interpreting Artifacts and Pitfalls in MR Imaging of the Breast RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S147 - S164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]