|
|
||||||||
EDUCATION EXHIBIT |
1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Unit 325, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030. Recipient of a Magna Cum Laude award for an education exhibit at the 2003 RSNA Scientific Assembly. Received March 9, 2004; revision requested June 4 and received July 21; accepted August 27. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to S.G. (e-mail: sgupta{at}mdanderson.org).
Percutaneous needle biopsy with imaging guidance allows access to lesions in virtually all mediastinal locations. A direct mediastinal approach, which enables extrapleural needle placement, is the preferred method to avoid the risk of pneumothorax. Techniques that allow extrapleural access include the parasternal, paravertebral, transsternal, and suprasternal approaches, which are performed with computed tomographic or ultrasonographic guidance. The parasternal approach is used for biopsy of anterior or middle mediastinal lesions when the lesion or intervening mediastinal fat extends to the anterior chest wall, lateral to the sternum; injury to the internal mammary vessels is a potential complication. The paravertebral approach is used for biopsy of subcarinal and other posterior mediastinal lesions; saline solution is often injected to widen the mediastinum. The transsternal approach, which involves needle placement through the sternum, is used for biopsy of anterior or middle mediastinal lesions that are not accessible with the parasternal approach. Biopsy of superior mediastinal lesions can be performed with a suprasternal approach. An alternative to these direct mediastinal approaches involves advancing the needle through a pleural space created by an existing pleural effusion or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Another alternative is the transpulmonary approach, which involves transgression of the lung and visceral pleura by the needle and is associated with a substantial risk of pneumothorax.
© RSNA, 2005
Related Article
RadioGraphics 2005 25: 786-788.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. H. Choplin, D. J. Conces Jr, and S. D. Teague Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 786 - 788. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |