RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.244035723
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chien, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chien, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, C. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ultrasound
RadioGraphics 2004;24:999-1008
© RSNA, 2004


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Imaging Appearances of Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstruction1

Alexander J. Chien, MD, Jon A. Jacobson, MD, David A. Jamadar, MB,BS, FRCS, FRCR, Monica Kalume Brigido, MD, John E. Femino, MD and Curtis W. Hayes, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Pomona Valley Hospital and Medical Center, Pomona, Calif (A.J.C.); the Departments of Radiology (J.A.J., D.A.J., M.K.B.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (J.E.F.), University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, TC-2910G, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0329; and the Department of Radiology, Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia (C.W.H.). Received September 4, 2004; revision requested December 11 and received February 23, 2004; accepted March 8. Address correspondence to J.A.J. (e-mail: jjacobsn@umich.edu).

Six patients were retrospectively identified as having undergone lateral ligament reconstruction surgery. The surgical procedures were categorized into four groups: direct lateral ligament repair, peroneus brevis tendon rerouting, peroneus brevis tendon loop, and peroneus brevis tendon split and rerouting. At radiography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, the presence of one or more suture anchors in the region of the anterior talofibular ligament indicates direct ligament repair, whereas a fibular tunnel indicates peroneus brevis tendon rerouting or loop. Both ultrasonography (US) and MR imaging demonstrate rerouted tendons as part of lateral ankle reconstruction; however, MR imaging can also depict the rerouted tendon within an osseous tunnel if present, especially if T1-weighted sequences are used. Artifact from suture material may obscure the tendon at MR imaging but not at US. With both modalities, the integrity of the rerouted peroneus brevis tendon is best evaluated by following the tendon proximally from its distal attachment site, which typically remains unchanged. The rerouted tendon or portion of the tendon can then be traced proximally to its reattachment site. Familiarity with the surgical procedures most commonly used for lateral ankle ligament reconstruction, and with the imaging features of these procedures, is essential for avoiding diagnostic pitfalls and ensuring accurate assessment of the ligament reconstruction.

© RSNA, 2004

Index Terms: Ankle, anatomy, 46.92 • Ankle, MR, 46.1214 • Ligaments, 46.486







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.