RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.242035072
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Breast (Imaging and Interventional)
Right arrow Ultrasound
RadioGraphics 2004;24:357-365
© RSNA, 2004


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Normal and Abnormal US Findings at the Mastectomy Site1

Sun Mi Kim, MD and Jeong Mi Park, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388–1 Pungnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138–736, Korea. Recipient of a Certificate of Merit award for an education exhibit at the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 17, 2003; revision requested May 7 and received June 26; accepted June 27. Both authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to J.M.P., Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics G3/120, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-1840 (e-mail: jmpark@mail.radiology.wisc.edu).

Evaluation of a mastectomy site is more effective with ultrasonography (US) than with either mammography or chest computed tomography because abnormalities are usually small and close to the skin surface. US does not involve the use of ionizing radiation and has a multiplanar scanning capability. The technique is readily available and inexpensive, and it allows real-time monitoring of needle tip placement during biopsy of a lesion. Normal US anatomy of the chest wall after mastectomy usually consists of four layers: skin, subcutaneous fat, pectoral muscles, and rib and intercostal muscle. The axilla is changed in appearance after lymph node dissection, but it remains the same in patients who have undergone simple mastectomy. US can accurately depict benign and malignant conditions in the mastectomy site, including fluid collection, fibrosis, local recurrent tumor, and metastatic lymphadenopathy, and can enable accurate diagnosis based on findings at fine needle aspiration biopsy.

© RSNA, 2004

Index Terms: Breast, postoperative, 00.45 • Breast, surgery, 00.45 • Breast, US, 00.1298 • Breast neoplasms, 00.32 • Breast neoplasms, surgery, 00.45 Breast neoplasms, US, 00.1298




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
J. H. Youk, E.-K. Kim, M. J. Kim, and K. K. Oh
Imaging Findings of Chest Wall Lesions on Breast Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2008; 27(1): 125 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.