RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.241035078
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pannu, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pannu, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vascular and/or Interventional Radiology
(Radiographics. 2004;24:209-223.)
© RSNA, 2004


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

PET-CT in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Initial Observations1

Harpreet K. Pannu, MD, Robert E. Bristow, MD, Christian Cohade, MD, Elliot K. Fishman, MD and Richard L. Wahl, MD

1 From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (H.K.P., C.C., E.K.F., R.L.W.) and the Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service (R.E.B.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. R.L.W. is a stockholder in CTI Molecular Imaging, Knoxville, Tenn; he also has a research agreement with and has received honoraria from GE Medical Systems. Received March 24, 2003; revision requested April 22 and received August 11; accepted August 14. Address correspondence to H.K.P. (e-mail: hpannu1@jhmi.edu).

Noninvasive diagnosis of early recurrence of ovarian cancer is challenging due to the small size of peritoneal metastases. Small-volume disease may not be evident at anatomic imaging in patients with elevated serum tumor markers. Functional imaging in the form of positron emission tomography (PET) can help identify patients with recurrent tumor. However, lesion localization for possible surgical treatment is difficult with PET alone. Combined functional-anatomic imaging with fused PET and computed tomographic (CT) scans is feasible and may improve disease detection by increasing radiologic sensitivity and specificity. PET and PET-CT have a potential role in evaluating patients for recurrent ovarian cancer, particularly those with negative CT or magnetic resonance imaging findings and rising tumor marker levels. Fused PET-CT scans obtained with combined scanners can help localize pathologic activity and differentiate this activity from physiologic radiotracer uptake. Combined functional-anatomic imaging can also increase diagnostic confidence at CT. Further study is needed to determine the possible benefits of lesion conspicuity at PET and anatomic localization at CT on fused PET-CT scans.

© RSNA, 2004

Index Terms: Diagnostic radiology, 852.1211, 852.12163 • Dual-modality imaging, PET/CT • Ovary, CT, 852.1211 • Ovary, neoplasms, 852.39 Ovary, PET, 852.12163




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. D. Levy, J. C. Shaw, and L. H. Sobin
From the Archives of the AFIP: Secondary Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions of the Peritoneal Cavity: Imaging Features with Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2009; 29(2): 347 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
N. Subhas, P. V. Patel, H. K. Pannu, H. A. Jacene, E. K. Fishman, and R. L. Wahl
Imaging of Pelvic Malignancies with In-Line FDG PET-CT: Case Examples and Common Pitfalls of FDG PET
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 1031 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. M. Blodgett, B. Casagranda, D. W. Townsend, and C. C. Meltzer
Issues, Controversies, and Clinical Utility of Combined PET/CT Imaging: What Is the Interpreting Physician Facing?
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5_supp): S138 - S145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
U. Metser, E. Miller, A. Kessler, H. Lerman, G. Lievshitz, R. Oren, and E. Even-Sapir
Solid Splenic Masses: Evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 52 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.