|
|
||||||||
EDUCATION EXHIBIT |
1 From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (H.K.P., C.C., E.K.F., R.L.W.) and the Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service (R.E.B.), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. R.L.W. is a stockholder in CTI Molecular Imaging, Knoxville, Tenn; he also has a research agreement with and has received honoraria from GE Medical Systems. Received March 24, 2003; revision requested April 22 and received August 11; accepted August 14. Address correspondence to H.K.P. (e-mail: hpannu1@jhmi.edu).
Noninvasive diagnosis of early recurrence of ovarian cancer is challenging due to the small size of peritoneal metastases. Small-volume disease may not be evident at anatomic imaging in patients with elevated serum tumor markers. Functional imaging in the form of positron emission tomography (PET) can help identify patients with recurrent tumor. However, lesion localization for possible surgical treatment is difficult with PET alone. Combined functional-anatomic imaging with fused PET and computed tomographic (CT) scans is feasible and may improve disease detection by increasing radiologic sensitivity and specificity. PET and PET-CT have a potential role in evaluating patients for recurrent ovarian cancer, particularly those with negative CT or magnetic resonance imaging findings and rising tumor marker levels. Fused PET-CT scans obtained with combined scanners can help localize pathologic activity and differentiate this activity from physiologic radiotracer uptake. Combined functional-anatomic imaging can also increase diagnostic confidence at CT. Further study is needed to determine the possible benefits of lesion conspicuity at PET and anatomic localization at CT on fused PET-CT scans.
© RSNA, 2004
Index Terms: Diagnostic radiology, 852.1211, 852.12163 Dual-modality imaging, PET/CT Ovary, CT, 852.1211 Ovary, neoplasms, 852.39 Ovary, PET, 852.12163
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. D. Levy, J. C. Shaw, and L. H. Sobin From the Archives of the AFIP: Secondary Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions of the Peritoneal Cavity: Imaging Features with Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, March 1, 2009; 29(2): 347 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Subhas, P. V. Patel, H. K. Pannu, H. A. Jacene, E. K. Fishman, and R. L. Wahl Imaging of Pelvic Malignancies with In-Line FDG PET-CT: Case Examples and Common Pitfalls of FDG PET RadioGraphics, July 1, 2005; 25(4): 1031 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Blodgett, B. Casagranda, D. W. Townsend, and C. C. Meltzer Issues, Controversies, and Clinical Utility of Combined PET/CT Imaging: What Is the Interpreting Physician Facing? Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5_supp): S138 - S145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Metser, E. Miller, A. Kessler, H. Lerman, G. Lievshitz, R. Oren, and E. Even-Sapir Solid Splenic Masses: Evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2005; 46(1): 52 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |