RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.241035063
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gupta, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, M. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vascular and/or Interventional Radiology
(Radiographics. 2004;24:175-189.)
© RSNA, 2004


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Various Approaches for CT-guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Deep Pelvic Lesions: Anatomic and Technical Considerations1

Sanjay Gupta, MD, Huan Luong Nguyen, MD, Frank A. Morello, Jr, MD, Kamran Ahrar, MD, Michael J. Wallace, MD, David C. Madoff, MD, Ravi Murthy, MD and Marshall E. Hicks, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 325, Houston, TX 77030-4009. Recipient of a Certificate of Merit award for an education exhibit at the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 14, 2003; revision requested April 14 and received May 13; accepted May 14. Address correspondence to S.G. (e-mail: sgupta@mdanderson.org).

Access route planning for computed tomography–guided biopsy of deep pelvic masses remains challenging because vital structures often obstruct the projected needle path. The classical approach through the lower anterior abdominal wall allows access to lesions located anterior, superior, or lateral to the urinary bladder. However, this approach has limitations: Deep masses are difficult to reach because of intervening structures, the bowel or bladder may be unavoidably traversed, and peritoneal transgression is often painful. A transgluteal approach is useful for biopsy of presacral and perirectal lesions and lesions located posterolateral to the bladder. An anterolateral approach through the iliopsoas muscle allows safe extraperitoneal access to external and internal iliac nodes, masses located along the lateral pelvic sidewall, and adnexal lesions. A transosseous (transsacral or transiliac) approach can occasionally be used for otherwise inaccessible lesions. Use of a curved needle, change in patient position, or injection of saline solution to displace intervening structures may also be helpful. Familiarity with normal cross-sectional pelvic anatomy facilitates planning of a safe access route and helps avoid injury to adjacent structures. A thorough understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of each approach allows the clinician to choose the most appropriate approach in a given situation.

© RSNA, 2004

Index Terms: Biopsies, complications, **.4582 • Biopsies, technology • Pelvic organs, biopsy, **.126 • Pelvis, CT, **.1211




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. G. Yarram, H. V. Nghiem, E. Higgins, G. Fox, B. Nan, and I. R. Francis
Evaluation of Imaging-Guided Core Biopsy of Pelvic Masses
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1208 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.