|
|
||||||||
EDUCATION EXHIBIT |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY. Received August 14, 2002; revision requested November 18; final revision received August 21, 2003; accepted August 22. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to B.R.K., Department of Radiology, Box 1141, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029-6574 (e-mail: syrob@msn.com).
Breast lymphoscintigraphy is increasingly performed before surgery to delineate the drainage to the sentinel node (SN) in the axilla. On the basis of the histologic status of harvested SNs, the disease status of the entire axilla can be predicted. This prediction allows a more limited dissection to be performed while maintaining staging accuracy comparable with that of classic axillary lymph node dissection. Lymphoscintigraphy assists surgeons in harvesting the SN during gamma probeassisted axillary biopsy or dissection and provides a wide field of view survey, among other benefits. When certain injection protocols are used, lymphoscintigraphy can be performed in the afternoon before surgery the next morning, thus minimizing disruptions of tight surgical schedules. Image acquisition can be optimized and SN activity can be maximized by means of such factors as parameters for preparation of the radiotracer, injection techniques, energy settings for the gamma camera, breast displacement maneuvers, and techniques for marking and outlining the patients body. The ultimate goals are to delineate the true SN, maximize activity in the node for facilitated removal (even at next-day surgery), and deliver the information to the surgeon without delaying the surgical schedule.
© RSNA, 2004
Index Terms: Breast neoplasms, metastases, 07.33 Breast neoplasms, radionuclide studies, 00.12161 Breast neoplasms, staging, 00.32 Lymphatic system, neoplasms, 997.8331 Lymphatic system, radionuclide studies, 997.12961
Related Article
RadioGraphics 2004 24: 139-145.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Thompson, S. Korourian, R. Henry-Tillman, L. Adkins, S. Mumford, M. Smith, and V. S. Klimberg Intraoperative Radioisotope Injection for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2008; 15(11): 3216 - 3221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Madsen, P. Gobardhan, V Bongers, M Albregts, J. Burgmans, P De Hooge, J Van Gorp, and T. van Dalen The Impact on Post-surgical Treatment of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy of Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., April 1, 2007; 14(4): 1486 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A F Scarsbrook, A Ganeshan, and K M Bradley Pearls and pitfalls of radionuclide imaging of the lymphatic system. Part 1: sentinel node lymphoscintigraphy in malignant melanoma Br. J. Radiol., February 1, 2007; 80(950): 132 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Povoski, J. O. Olsen, D. C. Young, J. Clarke, W. E. Burak, M. J. Walker, W. E. Carson, L. D. Yee, D. M. Agnese, R. V. Pozderac, et al. Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intradermal, Intraparenchymal, and Subareolar Injection Routes for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy in Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 13(11): 1412 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Krynyckyi, S. Sata, I. Zolty, C. K. Kim, and K. Knesaurek Reducing Exposure from 57Co Sources During Breast Lymphoscintigraphy by Optimizing Energy Windows and Other Suggested Enhancements of Acquisition and the Display of Images J. Nucl. Med. Technol., December 1, 2004; 32(4): 198 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S H Kim, J Shim, C K Kim, J Machac, and B R Krynyckyi Reverse echelon node and a lymphatic ectasia in the same patient during breast lymphoscintigraphy: the importance of injection and imaging technique Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2004; 77(924): 1053 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Sata, K Knesaurek, and B R Krynyckyi Effective dose in sentinel lymph node imaging Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2004; 77(920): 709 - 709. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Dillehay, B. R. Krynyckyi, and C. K. Kim Invited Commentary * Authors' Response RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 139 - 145. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |