|
|
||||||||
EDUCATION EXHIBIT |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center, 1st Ave at 16th St, New York, NY 10003. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 28, 2003; revision requested April 15; revision received May 21; accepted May 27. Address correspondence to S.A.J. (e-mail: sjoffe@bethisraelny.org).
Hematuria can be well evaluated with a comprehensive contrast materialenhanced multidetector row computed tomography (CT) protocol that combines unenhanced, nephrographic-phase, and excretory-phase imaging. Unenhanced images are obtained from the kidneys to the bladder and allow optimal detection of renal calculi, a common cause of hematuria. Renal parenchymal abnormalities, particularly masses, are best visualized on nephrographic-phase images, which also provide excellent evaluation of the other abdominal organs. Thin-section delayed images obtained from the kidneys to the bladder demonstrate the urinary tract distended with contrast material and are useful in detecting urothelial disease. Intravenous urography, ultrasonography, CT, retrograde ureterography and pyelography, cystoscopy, and ureteroscopy can all be used to evaluate patients with hematuria. In the past, a combination of several of these examinations was necessary to fully evaluate these patients. Now, however, this CT protocol may permit evaluation of hematuria patients with a single comprehensive examination, although more experience and data are needed to determine its efficacy in this setting.
© RSNA, 2003
Index Terms: Computed tomography (CT), multidetector row, 80.1211 Genitourinary system, CT, 80.1211 Urography, technology, 80.1221
Related Article
RadioGraphics 2003 23: 1455-1456.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Seo, K. H. Lee, H. J. Kim, K. Kim, S.-B. Kang, S. Y. Kim, and Y. H. Kim Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis With Sliding Slab Ray-Sum Interpretation of Low-Dose Unenhanced CT and Standard-Dose IV Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2009; 193(1): 96 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Vrtiska, R. P. Hartman, J. M. Kofler, M. R. Bruesewitz, B. F. King, and C. H. McCollough Spatial Resolution and Radiation Dose of a 64-MDCT Scanner Compared with Published CT Urography Protocols Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 941 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Silverman, J. R. Leyendecker, and E. S. Amis Jr What Is the Current Role of CT Urography and MR Urography in the Evaluation of the Urinary Tract? Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 309 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Sadow, S. G. Silverman, M. P. O'Leary, and J. E. Signorovitch Bladder Cancer Detection with CT Urography in an Academic Medical Center Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 195 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Richenberg Haematuria Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 57 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hosseinzadeh Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 46 - 48. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Park, J. K. Kim, H. J. Lee, H. J. Choi, and K.-S. Cho Hematuria: Portal Venous Phase Multi Detector Row CT of the Bladder A Prospective Study Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 798 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Jung, S. H. Kim, S. I. Jung, S. I. Hwang, and S. H. Kim Renal Papillary Necrosis: Review and Comparison of Findings at Multi-Detector Row CT and Intravenous Urography RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1827 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Sudakoff, D. P. Dunn, R. S. Hellman, M. A. Laguna, C. R. Wilson, R. W. Prost, D. C. Eastwood, and H. J. Lim Opacification of the Genitourinary Collecting System During MDCT Urography with Enhanced CT Digital Radiography: Nonsaline Versus Saline Bolus Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 122 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. J. Browne, C. P. Meehan, J. Colville, R. Power, and W. C. Torreggiani Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract: Spectrum of Imaging Findings RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1609 - 1627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Sudakoff, M. Guralnick, P. Langenstroer, W. D. Foley, K. L. Cihlar, J. S. Shakespear, and W. A. See CT Urography of Urinary Diversions with Enhanced CT Digital Radiography: Preliminary Experience Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 131 - 138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kawashima, T. J. Vrtiska, A. J. LeRoy, R. P. Hartman, C. H. McCollough, and B. F. King Jr CT Urography RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S35 - S54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. V. Coakley and B. M. Yeh Invited Commentary RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1455 - 1456. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |