RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romero, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Romero, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, R. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroradiology
Right arrow Ultrasound
(Radiographics. 2002;22:1165-1176.)
© RSNA, 2002


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

US of Neurovascular Occlusive Disease: Interpretive Pearls and Pitfalls1

Javier M. Romero, MD, Michael H. Lev, MD, Suk-Tak Chan, PhD, Molly M. Connelly, BA, Ryan C. Curiel, SB, Anna E. Jackson, AB, R. Gilberto Gonzalez, MD, PhD and Robert H. Ackerman, MD, MPH

1 From the Departments of Radiology (J.M.R., M.H.L., M.M.C., R.C.C., A.E.J., R.G.G., R.H.A.) and Neurology (R.H.A.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114; and the Department of Optometry and Radiography, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hunghom, Kowloon, Hong Kong (S.T.C.). Presented as an education exhibit at the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received January 21, 2002; revision requested March 6 and received April 1; accepted April 1. Address correspondence to M.H.L. (e-mail: mlev@partners.org).

Ultrasonography (US) of the head and neck is a convenient but operator-dependent screening tool for detection and diagnosis of neurovascular occlusive disease. In US examination of the extracranial carotid arteries, stenosis is most commonly graded according to the peak systolic Doppler velocity in the region of maximal luminal narrowing rather than according to the percentage of atheromatous plaque occupying the lumen. However, the peak systolic velocity is not always reliable in estimation of the degree of stenosis. General diagnostic pitfalls include technical difficulties with scanning, failure to review the spectral waveform patterns, the presence of additional stenotic lesions, and anatomic variants. Specific examples of pitfalls include tandem lesions, differentiation of pseudo-occlusion from true total occlusion, pseudonormalization of velocities in cases of very severe stenosis, lesions of the carotid artery origin or aortic valve, progression of subclavian steal, underestimation of severe stenosis due to heavily calcified plaque, a persistent trigeminal artery, and contralateral carotid artery stenosis. Although conventional angiography remains the standard of reference for assessment of carotid artery disease, recognition of these common sources of error in US can improve the accuracy of this noninvasive test in diagnosis of carotid artery occlusion.

© RSNA, 2002

Index Terms: Carotid arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 172.721, 904.721 • Carotid arteries, US, 172.1298, 904.1298 • Subclavian steal syndrome, 901.767 • Ultrasound (US), Doppler studies, 172.12984, 90.12984 • Vertebral arteries, US, 901.1298




eLetters:

Read all eLetters

US Doppler in Vertebral Artery
Francisco Campoy-Balbontin
RadioGraphics Online, 21 Mar 2003 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2002 by the Radiological Society of North America.