|
|
||||||||
EDUCATION EXHIBIT |
1 From the Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB 7510, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599. Presented at the 2001 annual meeting of the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists and the Society of Uroradiology and solicited by the Editor. Received August 27, 2001; revision requested September 25 and received October 19; accepted October 22. Supported in part by a 1996 RSNA Seed Grant Award. Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: julia_fielding@med.unc.edu).
Pelvic floor weakness is common in middle-aged and elderly parous women and is often associated with stress incontinence, uterine prolapse, constipation, and incomplete defecation. Most patients with incontinence and minimal pelvic floor weakness can be treated based on physical examination and basic urodynamic findings. However, in women with symptoms of multicompartment involvement for whom a complex repair is planned or who have undergone previous repairs, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be a useful preoperative planning tool. The MR imaging evaluation is performed with the patient in the supine position, without contrast agents, and within 15 minutes. A multicoil array and a rapid half-Fourier T2-weighted imaging sequence are used to obtain sagittal images while the patient is at rest and during pelvic strain, followed by axial images. On these images, the radiologist identifies the pubococcygeal line (which represents the level of the pelvic floor), the H and M lines (which are helpful for confirming pelvic floor laxity), and the angle of the levator plate with the pubococcygeal line (which is helpful for identifying small bowel prolapse). In the appropriate patient, MR images provide relatively easy three-dimensional conceptualization of the pelvic floor and can significantly influence treatment planning.
© RSNA, 2002
Index Terms: Pelvic organs, MR, 757.121416, 85.121416 Pelvic organs, prolapse, 74.159, 757.159, 85.1436
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. F. El Sayed, S. El Mashed, A. Farag, M. M. Morsy, and M. S. Abdel Azim Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Assessment with Combined Analysis of Static and Dynamic MR Imaging Findings Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 518 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Boyadzhyan, S. S. Raman, and S. Raz Role of Static and Dynamic MR Imaging in Surgical Pelvic Floor Dysfunction RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 949 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Kruger, S. W. Heap, B. A. Murphy, and H. P. Dietz Pelvic Floor Function in Nulliparous Women Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Obstet. Gynecol., March 1, 2008; 111(3): 631 - 638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fujiwara, K. Togashi, T. Yamaoka, A. Nakai, A. Kido, S. Nishio, T. Yamamoto, H. Kitagaki, and S. Fujii Kinematics of the Uterus: Cine Mode MR Imaging RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): e19 - e19. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |