|
|
||||||||
Helping the Hepatic Surgeon |
1 From the Department of Radiology and Gastrointestinal Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul 135-710, South Korea. Recipient of a Certificate of Merit award for an education exhibit at the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 6, 2001; revision requested March 5 and received June 7; accepted June 21. Address correspondence to H.K.L. (e-mail: hklim@smc.samsung.co.kr).
Most cholangiocarcinomas are ductal adenocarcinomas that arise from both intra- and extrahepatic bile duct epithelium, and their typical growth pattern can be classified as exophytic, infiltrative, polypoid, or a combination of these. Those of unusual histologic type (eg, mucin-hypersecreting cholangiocarcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma, biliary cystadenocarcinoma, and mucinous carcinoma) show a growth pattern different from that of the typical ones (ie, ductal). Cholangiocarcinomas frequently develop in patients with any of a variety of preexisting bile duct diseases, some of which are considered precursors of cholangiocarcinoma (eg, biliary lithiasis, clonorchiasis, recurrent pyogenic cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis). Some bulky hepatic tumors of either primary or secondary origin mimic exophytic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. Some variants of hepatocellular carcinoma, such as sclerosing, fibrolamellar, and cholangiohepatocellular carcinoma, resemble exophytic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma, while that with intraductal growth resembles polypoid cholangiocarcinoma. Among benign bile duct diseases, tumorous conditions (eg, benign biliary tumors) may mimic polypoid cholangiocarcinoma, whereas benign stricture of various causes (eg, cholangitides, traumatic and postsurgical sequelae, chronic pancreatitis, papillary stenosis) usually mimics infiltrative cholangiocarcinoma.
Index Terms: Bile ducts, CT, 76.12114 Bile ducts, diseases, 76.288 Bile ducts, neoplasms, 76.321 Bile ducts, US Liver neoplasms, diagnosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. O. Menias, V. R. Surabhi, S. R. Prasad, H. L. Wang, V. R. Narra, and K. N. Chintapalli Mimics of Cholangiocarcinoma: Spectrum of Disease RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 1115 - 1129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Slattery and D. V. Sahani What Is the Current State-of-the-Art Imaging for Detection and Staging of Cholangiocarcinoma? Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(8): 913 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Park, J. M. Lee, S. H. Kim, J. Y. Jeong, Y. J. Kim, K. H. Lee, S. H. Choi, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi CT Differentiation of cholangiocarcinoma from periductal fibrosis in patients with hepatolithiasis. Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 445 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Choi, J. K. Han, J. M. Lee, K. H. Lee, S. H. Kim, J. Y. Lee, and B. I. Choi Differentiating Malignant from Benign Common Bile Duct Stricture with Multiphasic Helical CT Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 178 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-S. Park, T. K. Kim, K. W. Kim, S. W. Park, J. K. Lee, J.-S. Kim, J. H. Lee, K. A. Kim, A. Y. Kim, P. N. Kim, et al. Differentiation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cholangiocarcinoma from Benign Stricture: Findings at MRCP versus ERCP Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 234 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Choi, J. K. Han, S. T. Hong, and K. H. Lee Clonorchiasis and Cholangiocarcinoma: Etiologic Relationship and Imaging Diagnosis Clin. Microbiol. Rev., July 1, 2004; 17(3): 540 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |