RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pannu, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pannu, H. K.
Right arrow Articles by Fishman, E. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetric/Gynecologic Radiology
Right arrow Computed Tomography
(Radiographics. 2001;21:1155-1168.)
© RSNA, 2001


Education Exhibit

CT Evaluation of Cervical Cancer: Spectrum of Disease1

Harpreet K. Pannu, MD, Frank M. Corl, MS and Elliot K. Fishman, MD

1 From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 10, 2001; revision requested May 16 and received June 22; accepted July 2. Address correspondence to H.K.P., Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 (e-mail: hpannu@jhmi.edu).

Invasive cervical cancer is the third most common gynecologic malignancy. The prognosis is based on the stage, size, and histologic grade of the primary tumor and the status of the lymph nodes. Assessment of the stage of disease is important in determining whether the patient may benefit from surgery or will receive radiation therapy. The official clinical staging system of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics has led to errors of 65%–90% in stage III and IV disease; the result has been unofficial extended staging with cross-sectional imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT). CT is useful in staging advanced disease and in monitoring patients for recurrence. The primary tumor is heterogeneous and hypoattenuating relative to normal stroma on contrast material–enhanced scans. Obliteration of the periureteral fat plane and a soft-tissue mass are the most reliable signs of parametrial extension. Less than 3 mm separation of the tumor from the pelvic muscles and vascular encasement are signs of pelvic side wall invasion. Lymphatic spread is along the external and internal iliac nodal chains and the presacral route to the paraaortic nodes. Distant metastases are seen with primary or recurrent disease and can involve the liver, lung, and bone.

Index Terms: Uterine neoplasms, CT, 854.12115 • Uterine neoplasms, diagnosis, 854.32 • Uterine neoplasms, metastases, **.332 • Uterine neoplasms, staging, 854.32




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. Y. Jeong, H. K. Kang, T. W. Chung, J. J. Seo, and J. G. Park
Uterine Cervical Carcinoma after Therapy: CT and MR Imaging Findings
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 969 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. S. Siegelman
Invited Commentary
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 981 - 981.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. Kaur, P. M. Silverman, R. B. Iyer, C. F. Verschraegen, P. J. Eifel, and C. Charnsangavej
Diagnosis, Staging, and Surveillance of Cervical Carcinoma
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1621 - 1631.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2001 by the Radiological Society of North America.