|
|
||||||||
EDUCATION EXHIBIT |
1 From the Department of Radiology and Institut de Diagnòstic per la Imatge, Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. Presented as a scientific exhibit at the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 2, 2000; revision requested April 5 and received May 22; accepted May 26. Address correspondence to S.Q. (e-mail: squiroga@hg.vhebron.es).
The liver has a unique dual blood supply, which makes helical computed tomography (CT) a highly suitable technique for hepatic imaging. Helical CT allows single breath-hold scanning without motion artifacts. Because of rapid image acquisition, two-phase (hepatic arterial phase and portal venous phase) evaluation of the hepatic parenchyma is possible, improving tumor detection and tumor characterization in a single CT study. The arterial and portal venous supplies to the liver are not independent systems. There are several communications between the vessels, including transsinusoidal, transvasal, and transplexal routes. When vascular compromise occurs, there are often changes in the volume of blood flow in individual vessels and even in the direction of blood flow. These perfusion disorders can be detected with helical CT and are generally seen as an area of high attenuation on hepatic arterial phase images that returns to normal on portal venous phase images; this finding reflects increased arterial blood flow and arterioportal shunting in most cases. Familiarity with the helical CT appearances of these perfusion disorders will result in more accurate diagnosis. By recognizing these perfusion disorders, false-positive diagnosis (hypervascular tumors) or overestimation of the size of liver tumors (eg, hepatocellular carcinoma) can be avoided.
Index Terms: Computed tomography (CT), helical, 761.12115 Computed tomography (CT), perfusion study, 761.12116 Liver, blood supply, 761.12115, 761.12116 Liver, diseases, 761.14, 761.20, 761.30, 761.49
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Colagrande, N. Centi, R. Galdiero, and A. Ragozzino Transient Hepatic Intensity Differences: Part 2, Those Not Associated with Focal Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 160 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R. Kamel, E. Liapi, and E. K. Fishman Incidental nonneoplastic hypervascular lesions in the noncirrhotic liver: diagnosis with 16-MDCT and 3D CT angiography. Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 682 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-S. Yu and N. M. Rofsky Hepatic metastases: perilesional enhancement on dynamic MRI. Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2006; 186(4): 1051 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. Lee, J. K. Han, J. Y. Jeong, Y. J. Kim, H. J. Lee, S. H. Park, and B. I. Choi Hepatic Attenuation Differences Associated with Obstruction of the Portal or Hepatic Veins in Patients with Hepatic Abscess Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 1015 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Metser, M. A. Haider, M. Dill-Macky, M. Atri, G. Lockwood, and M. Minden Fungal Liver Infection in Immunocompromised Patients: Depiction with Multiphasic Contrast-enhanced Helical CT Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 97 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Colagrande, N. Centi, G. La Villa, and N. Villari Transient Hepatic Attenuation Differences Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 459 - 464. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. S. Ianora, M. Memeo, C. Sabba, A. Cirulli, A. Rotondo, and G. Angelelli Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: Multi-Detector Row Helical CT Assessment of Hepatic Involvement Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 250 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Kim, T. K. Kim, K.-B. Sung, H.-K. Yoon, P. N. Kim, H. K. Ha, A. Y. Kim, H. J. Kim, and M.-G. Lee CT during Hepatic Arteriography and Portography: An Illustrative Review RadioGraphics, September 1, 2002; 22(5): 1041 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Wachsberg, P. Bahramipour, C. T. Sofocleous, and A. Barone Hepatofugal Flow in the Portal Venous System: Pathophysiology, Imaging Findings, and Diagnostic Pitfalls RadioGraphics, January 1, 2002; 22(1): 123 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Itai and S. Quiroga Interpretation of Transient Hepatic Attenuation Differences in Dynamic CT Dr Quiroga responds: RadioGraphics, July 1, 2001; 21(4): 875 - 876. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |