RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicolet, V.
Right arrow Articles by Prosmanne, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicolet, V.
Right arrow Articles by Prosmanne, O.
Related Collections
Right arrow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Obstetric/Gynecologic Radiology
(Radiographics. 2000;20:1539-1549.)
© RSNA, 2000


SCIENTIFIC EXHIBIT

MR Imaging of Cervical Carcinoma: A Practical Staging Approach1

Viviane Nicolet, MD, Louis Carignan, MD, France Bourdon, MD and Odile Prosmanne, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, CHUM, Hôpital Notre-Dame, 1560 Sherbrooke Est, Montréal, Québec, Canada H2L 4M1. Presented as a scientific exhibit at the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 24, 2000; revision requested March 21 and received May 10; accepted May 11. Address correspondence to V.N. (e-mail: vnicolet@videotron.ca).

Cervical carcinoma is the third most common gynecologic malignancy and is typically seen in younger women, often with serious consequences. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system provides worldwide epidemiologic and treatment response statistics. However, there are significant inaccuracies in the FIGO staging system, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, although not included in that system, is now widely accepted as optimal for evaluation of important prognostic factors such as lesion volume and metastatic lymph node involvement that will help determine the treatment strategy. MR imaging examination obviates the use of invasive procedures such as cystoscopy and proctoscopy, especially when there is no evidence of local extension. Brachytherapy and external beam therapy are optimized with MR imaging evaluation of the shape and direction of lesion growth. In general, T2-weighted MR imaging more clearly delineates cervical carcinoma and is preferred for evaluation of the lymph nodes. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging may help identify smaller tumors, detect or confirm invasion of adjacent organs, and identify fistulous tracts. MR imaging staging, when available, is invaluable for identifying important prognostic factors and optimizing treatment strategies.

Index Terms: Uterine neoplasms, 854.32 • Uterine neoplasms, MR, 854.12141, 854.121415, 854.12143 • Uterine neoplasms, staging, 854.12141




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Sala, S. Wakely, E. Senior, and D. Lomas
MRI of Malignant Neoplasms of the Uterine Corpus and Cervix
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1577 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
W. Park, Y. J. Park, S. J. Huh, B. G. Kim, D. S. Bae, J. Lee, B. H. Kim, J. Y. Choi, Y. C. Ahn, and D. H. Lim
The Usefulness of MRI and PET Imaging for the Detection of Parametrial Involvement and Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Cervical Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 35(5): 260 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.