RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heiss, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, F. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heiss, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, F. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Genitourinary Radiology
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiographics. 2000;20:1341-1352.)
© RSNA, 2000


SCIENTIFIC EXHIBIT

Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional Fast Spoiled Gradient-Echo Renal MR Imaging: Evaluation of Vascular and Nonvascular Disease1

Steven G. Heiss, MD , Roger Y. Shifrin, MD and F. Graham Sommer, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Rm H-1307, Stanford, CA 94305-5105. Presented as a scientific exhibit at the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received September 9, 1999; revision requested November 5 and received December 2; accepted December 13. Address correspondence to F.G.S. (e-mail: gsommer@leland.stanford.edu).

Breath-hold contrast materialenhanced three-dimensional (3D) fast spoiled gradient-echo (FSPGR) sequences are valuable techniques for evaluation of renal arteries and veins and diagnosis of significant renal arterial stenosis at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The excellent spatial and contrast resolution with these techniques, combined with the ability to perform studies in multiple vascular phases, also make them attractive for the diagnosis of a wide range of nonvascular processes that affect the kidneys, including renal infections, renal parenchymal diseases, and renal trauma. Particularly when combined with T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, the contrast-enhanced techniques are highly effective for characterization of renal masses owing to the ability to portray dynamic contrast enhancement. The ability to display venous structures with contrast-enhanced 3D FSPGR techniques helps staging of renal cell carcinoma. This article presents examples of the wide range of vascular and nonvascular renal diseases that may be effectively imaged with contrast materialenhanced 3D FSPGR techniques and illustrates the usefulness of the techniques for renal MR imaging.

Index Terms: Kidney, infection, 81.20 • Kidney, injuries, 81.41 • Kidney, MR, 81.12143 • Kidney neoplasms, diagnosis, 81.30 • Magnetic resonance (MR), vascular studies, 961.12942 • Renal arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 961.122, 961.12942, 961.721


Related Article

Invited Commentary
David H. Frager
RadioGraphics 2000 20: 1353-1354. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Sutter, D. Nanz, A. M. Lutz, T. Pfammatter, B. Seifert, A. Struwe, C. Heilmaier, D. Weishaupt, B. Marincek, and J. K. Willmann
Assessment of Aortoiliac and Renal Arteries: MR Angiography with Parallel Acquisition versus Conventional MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 276 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.