|
|
||||||||
SCIENTIFIC EXHIBIT |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1088. Presented as a scientific exhibit at the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 30, 1999; revision requested May 12 and received June 7; accepted June 9. Address reprint requests to M.Y.M.C. (e-mail: mchen@wfubmc.edu).
Following renal transplantation, patients are often evaluated with ultrasonography (US) or radionuclide imaging to assess renal function and the presence of possible complications. Both modalities are inexpensive, noninvasive, and nonnephrotoxic. A basic understanding of the surgical techniques commonly used for renal transplantation is useful when imaging these patients in order to recognize complications and to direct further imaging or intervention. The most frequent complications of renal transplantation include perinephric fluid collections; decreased renal function; and abnormalities of the vasculature, collecting system, and renal parenchyma. Perinephric fluid collections are common following transplantation, and their clinical significance depends on the type, location, size, and growth of the fluid collection, features that are well-evaluated with US. Causes of diminished renal function include acute tubular necrosis, rejection, and toxicity from medications. Radionuclide imaging is the most useful modality for assessing renal function. Vascular complications of transplantation include occlusion or stenosis of the arterial or venous supply, arteriovenous fistulas, and pseudoaneurysms. Although the standard for evaluating these vascular complications is angiography, US is an excellent noninvasive method for screening. Other transplant complications such as abnormalities of the collecting system and renal parenchyma are well-evaluated with both radionuclide imaging and US.
Index Terms: Kidney, radionuclide studies 81.12172 Kidney, transplantation, 81.455 Kidney, US, 81.12983 Transplantation, 81.455
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kobayashi, M. L. Censullo, L. L. Rossman, P. N. Kyriakides, B. D. Kahan, and A. M. Cohen Interventional Radiologic Management of Renal Transplant Dysfunction: Indications, Limitations, and Technical Considerations RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1109 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Park, J. K. Kim, and K.-S. Cho Complications of Renal Transplantation: Ultrasonographic Evaluation J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2007; 26(5): 615 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. M. Willems, L. W. Ernest van Heurn, G. W. Schurink, F. M. van der Sande, and J. H. M. Tordoir Renal allograft failure related to a lower extremity vascular access--a case report Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3583 - 3584. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takahashi, U. Humke, M. Girndt, B. Kramann, and M. Uder Early Posttransplantation Renal Allograft Perfusion Failure Due to Dissection: Diagnosis and Interventional Treatment Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2003; 180(3): 759 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Williamson Multiple-choice questionnaire: general Imaging, December 1, 2002; 14(6): 488 - 497. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Sebastia, S. Quiroga, R. Boye, C. Cantarell, M. Fernandez-Planas, and A. Alvarez Helical CT in Renal Transplantation: Normal Findings and Early and Late Complications RadioGraphics, September 1, 2001; 21(5): 1103 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |