HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stone, J. A. Articles by Castillo, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stone, J. A. Articles by Castillo, M. Related Collections Neuroradiology Computed Tomography Head and Neck

CT Evaluation of Prosthetic Ossicular Reconstruction Procedures: What the Otologist Needs to Know¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (J.A.S., S.K.M., M.C.) and Otolaryngology (S.K.M., B.S.J., V.N.C.), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill. Presented as a scientific exhibit at the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 13, 1999; revision requested May 5 and received May 28; accepted June 1. Address reprint requests to J.A.S., Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th St, Augusta, GA 30912-3910 (e-mail: jstone@mail.mcg.edu).

Postoperative otologic evaluation of patients who have undergone ossicular reconstruction is often difficult. However, thin-section computed tomography (CT) can help determine the type of prosthesis used for reconstruction and adequately assess for complications that may be causing postoperative conductive hearing loss. A variety of prostheses may be used in ossicular reconstruction (eg, stapes prosthesis, incus interposition graft, Applebaum prosthesis, Black oval-top prosthesis, Richards centered prosthesis, Goldenberg prosthesis) and can usually be identified at CT by their shapes and locations. Several causes of prosthetic failure are readily demonstrated at CT, including recurrent cholesteatoma and otitis media, formation of granulation tissue or adhesions, and various mechanical problems (eg, subluxation, dislocation, extrusion, fracture, bending). Perilymphatic fistula can be difficult to identify at CT but may be suggested by the presence of pneumolabyrinth, unexplained middle ear effusion, or fluid accumulation within the mastoid air cells. The presence of soft tissue within the oval window niche 4–6 weeks following surgery may indicate poststapedectomy granuloma or fibrosis. Familiarity with the normal and abnormal CT appearances of ossicular prostheses will enable the radiologist to assist the otologist in identifying patients in whom revision surgery is most appropriate.

Index Terms: Ear, CT, 212.1211 • Ear, prostheses, 212.42, 212.456 • Stents and prostheses, 212.42, 212.456

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. B. Hunter, M. T. Yoshino, R. B. Dzioba, R. A. Light, and W. G. Berger Medical Devices of the Head, Neck, and Spine RadioGraphics, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 257 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]