HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dalrymple, N. C. Articles by Pagan, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dalrymple, N. C. Articles by Pagan, R. A. Related Collections Computed Tomography Genitourinary Radiology

Pearls and Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Ureterolithiasis with Unenhanced Helical CT¹

(CME available in print version and on RSNA Link)

¹ From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Wilford Hall Medical Center (59 MDW/MTRD), 2200 Bergquist Dr, Suite 1, Lackland Air Force Base, TX 78236-5302. Presented as a scientific exhibit at the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 8, 1999; revisions requested April 20 and received May 26; accepted May 26. Address reprint requests to N.C.D. (e-mail: ncdalrymple@earthlink.net).

Several signs to assist interpretation of unenhanced helical computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained for suspected ureterolithiasis have been described. Because signs such as perinephric stranding are not always readily apparent, a methodical approach to interpretation of CT studies is important in determining the presence or absence of ureterolithiasis. Evaluation of the poles of the kidneys is helpful in detecting subtle stranding of the perinephric fat. Inspection of the intrarenal collecting system within the poles of the kidneys is helpful in identifying subtle collecting system dilatation and can help prevent mistaking an extrarenal pelvis for hydronephrosis. Careful inspection of the ureter throughout its course is the most reliable method of distinguishing between ureteral stones and phleboliths. However, when the ureter cannot be followed antegrade, the pelvic portion can often be identified in a retrograde fashion. When secondary signs of obstruction are present but no stone is present, differential diagnostic considerations include a recently passed stone, pyelonephritis, urinary tract obstruction unrelated to stone disease, and protease inhibitor deposition disease.

Index Terms: Ureter, calculi, 82.81 • Ureter, CT, 82.12115 • Ureter, stenosis or obstruction, 82.843

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Furlan, M. P. Federle, D. M. Yealy, T. D. Averch, and K. Pealer Nonobstructing Renal Stones on Unenhanced CT: A Real Cause for Renal Colic? Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): W125 - W127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. I. de Silva, F. A. Post, M. D. Griffin, and D. H. Dockrell HIV-1 Infection and the Kidney: An Evolving Challenge in HIV Medicine Mayo Clin. Proc., September 1, 2007; 82(9): 1103 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Rucker, C. O. Menias, and S. Bhalla Mimics of Renal Colic: Alternative Diagnoses at Unenhanced Helical CT RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S11 - S28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P. Tamm, P. M. Silverman, and W. P. Shuman Evaluation of the Patient with Flank Pain and Possible Ureteral Calculus Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 319 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]