HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stein, P. D. Articles by Gottschalk, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stein, P. D. Articles by Gottschalk, A. Related Collections Nuclear Medicine Chest Radiology

Review of Criteria Appropriate for a Very Low Probability of Pulmonary Embolism on Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scans: A Position Paper¹

¹ From the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, Mich (P.D.S.), and Michigan State University, East Lansing (A.G.). Received July 31, 1998; revision requested February 8, 1999 and final revision received May 17; accepted May 17. Address reprint requests to P.D.S., Henry Ford Cardiac Wellness Center, 6525 Second Ave, Detroit, MI 48202-3006.

The "low-probability" interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scans has been characterized as misleading or even dangerous because of the high prevalence of pulmonary embolism associated with such an interpretation. Since the completion of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) study, analyses of the PIOPED database have allowed identification of several abnormalities seen on ventilation-perfusion scans that have a positive predictive value (PPV) for pulmonary embolism of less than 10%. These include nonsegmental perfusion abnormalities (PPV = 8%), perfusion defects smaller than the corresponding areas of increased opacity at chest radiography (PPV = 8%), matched ventilation-perfusion abnormalities in two or three zones of a single lung (PPV = 3%), one to three small segmental perfusion defects (PPV = 1%), triple matched defects in the upper or middle lung zone (PPV = 4%), and the stripe sign (PPV = 7%). Use of these abnormalities as interpretative criteria constitutes "very low probability" interpretation and will reduce the number of low-probability interpretations of ventilation-perfusion lung scans, which may be considered nondiagnostic because of the unacceptably high rate of false-negative results. This will enhance the utility of the ventilation-perfusion lung scan for screening patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Index Terms: Embolism, pulmonary, 60.72 • Lung, perfusion, 60.12171 • Lung, ventilation, 60.12174

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. D. Sostman, P. D. Stein, A. Gottschalk, F. Matta, R. Hull, and L. Goodman Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Sensitivity and Specificity of Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in PIOPED II Study Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 941 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Burrill, Z. Dabbagh, F. Gollub, and M. Hamady Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2007; 83(985): 698 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gottschalk, P. D. Stein, H. D. Sostman, F. Matta, and A. Beemath Very Low Probability Interpretation of V/Q Lung Scans in Combination with Low Probability Objective Clinical Assessment Reliably Excludes Pulmonary Embolism: Data from PIOPED II J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1411 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. J. Schoepf, S. Z. Goldhaber, and P. Costello Spiral Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, May 11, 2004; 109(18): 2160 - 2167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. J. Schoepf and P. Costello CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: State of the Art Radiology, February 1, 2004; 230(2): 329 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Han, K. S. Lee, T. Franquet, N. L. Muller, T. S. Kim, H. Kim, O J. Kwon, and H. S. Byun Thrombotic and Nonthrombotic Pulmonary Arterial Embolism: Spectrum of Imaging Findings RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1521 - 1539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Stein, R. D. Hull, W. A. Ghali, K. C. Patel, R. E. Olson, F. A. Meyers, and N. K. Kalra Tracking the Uptake of Evidence: Two Decades of Hospital Practice Trends for Diagnosing Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Arch Intern Med, May 26, 2003; 163(10): 1213 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Itti, S. Nguyen, F. Robin, S. Desarnaud, J. Rosso, A. Harf, and M. Meignan Distribution of Ventilation/Perfusion Ratios in Pulmonary Embolism: An Adjunct to the Interpretation of Ventilation/Perfusion Lung Scans J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2002; 43(12): 1596 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bajc, U. Bitzen, B. Olsson, V. Perez de Sa, J. Palmer, and B. Jonson Lung Ventilation/Perfusion SPECT in the Artificially Embolized Pig J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2002; 43(5): 640 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gottschalk New Criteria for Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scan Interpretation: A Basis for Optimal Interaction with Helical CT Angiography RadioGraphics, July 1, 2000; 20(4): 1206 - 1210. [Full Text] [PDF]