RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gates, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hartnell, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gates, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hartnell, G. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vascular and/or Interventional Radiology
Right arrowRelated Articles
(Radiographics. 2000;20:121-133.)
© RSNA, 2000


SCIENTIFIC EXHIBIT

Optimized Diagnostic Angiography in High-Risk Patients with Severe Peripheral Vascular Disease1

Julia Gates, MD and George Gordon Hartnell, FRCR

1 From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass. Presented as a scientific exhibit at the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received March 1, 1999; revision requested April 14 and received May 27; accepted May 28. Address reprint requests to G.G.H., CVDL, Blalock 545, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287.

Conventional arteriography remains the usual method for preoperative assessment of severe peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Unfortunately, many peripheral arteriograms are still performed with a suboptimal technique, which can cause significant diagnostic errors in patients with severe PVD. A suboptimal technique may be due to poor collimation (causing incorrect exposure and incorrect gray scale), excessive patient-film distance (magnification unsharpness), inadequate volume or density of contrast material, poor contrast resolution (screen-film arteriography), nonselective injection, patient movement, and pressure from restraints or incorrect patient position (failure to profile lesions, pseudo-occlusion from external pressure or plantar flexion). The technique of selective digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) allows one to avoid these errors. The superior contrast resolution of DSA allows use of lower concentrations of contrast material. Selective injection into the external iliac artery allows proper positioning and improves image quality. Demonstration of distal vessels is best achieved by using biplane arteriography. For patients with severe resting ischemia, especially those with diabetes, high-quality selective DSA is essential to ensure that all distal vessels suitable for distal bypass grafting are identified. When properly performed, selective DSA remains the investigation of choice for reliably demonstrating arterial anatomy in high-risk patients with severe PVD.

Index Terms: Angiography, preoperative, 92.122 • Arteries, extremities, 92.72 • Arteries, stenosis or obstruction, 92.72


Related Articles

Dynamic Subtraction Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography: Technique, Clinical Applications, and Pitfalls
Yuji Watanabe, Masako Dohke, Akira Okumura, Yoshiki Amoh, Takayoshi Ishimori, Kazushige Oda, Takafumi Hayashi, Atsuto Hiyama, and Yoshihiro Dodo
RadioGraphics 2000 20: 135-152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Invited Commentary
Richard A. Baum
RadioGraphics 2000 20: 152-153. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Lapeyre, H. Kobeiter, P. Desgranges, A. Rahmouni, J.-P. Becquemin, and A. Luciani
Assessment of Critical Limb Ischemia in Patients with Diabetes: Comparison of MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1641 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. E. A. P. M. Adriaensen, M. C. J. M. Kock, T. Stijnen, M. R. H. M. van Sambeek, H. van Urk, P. M. T. Pattynama, and M. G. Myriam Hunink
Peripheral Arterial Disease: Therapeutic Confidence of CT versus Digital Subtraction Angiography and Effects on Additional Imaging Recommendations
Radiology, November 1, 2004; 233(2): 385 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Bezooijen, H. C. M. van den Bosch, A. V. Tielbeek, G. R. P. Thelissen, K. Visser, M. G. M. Hunink, L. E. M. Duijm, J. Wondergem, J. Buth, and P. W. M. Cuypers
Peripheral Arterial Disease: Sensitivity-encoded Multiposition MR Angiography Compared with Intraarterial Angiography and Conventional Multiposition MR Angiography
Radiology, April 1, 2004; 231(1): 263 - 271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Hartnell, K.-F. Kreitner, C. Duber, and A. Neufang
MR Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1188 - 1189.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. A. Baum
Invited Commentary
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2000; 20(1): 152 - 153.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2000 by the Radiological Society of North America.