RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rzeszotarski, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rzeszotarski, M. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nuclear Medicine
Right arrow Physics and Basic Science
(Radiographics. 1999;19:765-782.)
© RSNA, 1999


IMAGING & THERAPEUTIC TECHNOLOGY

The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents1

Counting Statistics

Mark S. Rzeszotarski, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University and MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Dr, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998. From the AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial at the 1997 RSNA scientific assembly. Received January 13, 1999; revision requested February 22 and received March 2; accepted March 5. Address reprint requests to the author.

The low radiation dose rates used in nuclear medicine necessitate image formation and measurements that are severely count limited. This limitation may mask our ability to perceive contrast in an image or may affect our confidence in quantitative functional measurements. The randomness of the signal can be described by using the Poisson probability distribution with its associated mean and variance. The validity of a measurement and uncertainties in a re-sult can be determined by examining the count statistics. If multiple measurements are used to derive a result, confidence levels can be determined by examination of the propagation of errors. The statistical properties of the detected signal can also be evaluated to determine if the equipment is functioning properly. For example, the {chi}2 test can be used to determine if there is too much or too little variability in count samples. Finally, image formation with limited numbers of photons results in noisy images that may be difficult to interpret. An understanding of the trade-offs between contrast, noise, and object size is required to set proper image acquisition parameters and thereby ensure that the information required to make a diagnosis is contained in the final image.

Index Terms: Physics • Radionuclide imaging, quality assurance • Statistical analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
W. D. Stiehm and M. Rzeszotarski
Fat suppression in MR imaging.
RadioGraphics, September 1, 1999; 19(5): 1177 - 1177.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.