HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hogge, J. P. Articles by de Paredes, E. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hogge, J. P. Articles by de Paredes, E. S. Related Collections Breast (Imaging and Interventional) Mammography

Quality Assurance in Mammography: Artifact Analysis

¹ Department of Radiology, Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 E Marshall St, Box 980615, Richmond, VA 23298 (J.P.H., C.P., C.M., S.T.L., P.F., E.S.D.)
² Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Va (D.S.)

Evaluation of mammograms for artifacts is essential for mammographic quality assurance. A variety of mammographic artifacts (ie, variations in mammographic density not caused by true attenuation differences) can occur and can create pseudolesions or mask true abnormalities. Many artifacts are readily identified, whereas others present a true diagnostic challenge. Factors that create artifacts may be related to the processor (eg, static, dirt or excessive developer buildup on the rollers, excessive roller pressure, damp film, scrapes and scratches, incomplete fixing, power failure, contaminated developer), the technologist (eg, improper film handling and loading, improper use of the mammography unit and related equipment, positioning and darkroom errors), the mammography unit (eg, failure of the collimation mirror to rotate, grid inhomogeneity, failure of the reciprocating grid to move, material in the tube housing, compression failure, improper alignment of the compression paddle with the Bucky tray, defective compression paddle), or the patient (eg, motion, superimposed objects or substances [jewelry, body parts, clothing, hair, implanted medical devices, foreign bodies, substances on the skin]). Familiarity with the broad range of artifacts and the measures required to eliminate them is vital. Careful attention to darkroom cleanliness, care in film handling, regularly scheduled processor maintenance and chemical replenishment, daily quality assurance activities, and careful attention to detail during patient positioning and mammography can reduce or eliminate most mammographic artifacts.

Index Terms: Breast radiography, 00.112 • Breast radiography, quality assurance

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. MINIGH Mammographic Film Artifacts. Radiol. Technol., May 1, 2006; 77(5): 389M - 402M. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Scheifele, A-J Lemke, and P. Reichart Hair artefacts in the head and neck region Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2003; 32(4): 255 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]