RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Dodo, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watanabe, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Dodo, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Gastrointestinal Radiology
(Radiographics. 1999;19:415-429.)
© RSNA, 1999


SCIENTIFIC EXHIBIT

Diagnostic Pitfalls of MR Cholangiopancreatography in the Evaluation of the Biliary Tract and Gallbladder

Yuji Watanabe, MD, PhD1, Masako Dohke, MD1, Takayoshi Ishimori, MD1, Yoshiki Amoh, MD1, Akira Okumura, MD1, Kazushige Oda, MD1, Shinji Koike, MD1 and Yoshihiro Dodo, MD, PhD1

1 Department of Radiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Miwa 1-1-1, Kurashiki 710-8602, Japan

Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography is a noninvasive imaging technique that has proved accurate in the diagnosis of biliary obstruction. However, various diagnostic pitfalls have been reported with MR cholangiopancreatography that were not encountered previously at conventional biliary imaging. These pitfalls may simulate or mask various pathologic conditions of the extrahepatic bile duct or main pancreatic duct and may be caused by a variety of factors. Because of its postprocessing nature, maximum-intensity-projection reconstruction may mask a small gallstone if the stone is surrounded by hyperintense bile and may cause false ductal disconnection or duplication when a breath hold is not performed perfectly. Extraductal factors (eg, metallic surgical clips, intravascular metallic coils, gas in the stomach or duodenum) can cause signal loss in the adjacent part of the extrahepatic bile duct, which may in turn lead to a false-positive diagnosis of ductal narrowing or obstruction. Normal vascular structures including the right hepatic and gastroduodenal arteries can cause pseudo-obstruction of the extrahepatic bile duct by pulsatile compression. Intraductal factors (eg, gas, hemorrhage, debris, iodinated contrast material) reduce the signal intensity of the bile, which may result in pseudo-obstruction, false filling defects, or a nonvisualized gallbladder or bile duct. Knowledge of the existence and high prevalence of these diagnostic pitfalls should help prevent misinterpretation of MR cholangiopancreatograms.

Index Terms: Bile ducts, MR, 76.1214 • Gallbladder, MR, 762.1214 • Magnetic resonance (MR), technology, 76.1214 Pancreatic ducts, MR, 774.1214




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. Watanabe, M. Nagayama, A. Okumura, Y. Amoh, T. Katsube, T. Suga, S. Koyama, K. Nakatani, and Y. Dodo
MR Imaging of Acute Biliary Disorders
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 477 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. K. Kim, B. S. Kim, J. H. Kim, H. K. Ha, P. N. Kim, A. Y. Kim, and M.-G. Lee
Diagnosis of Intrahepatic Stones: Superiority of MR Cholangiopancreatography over Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 429 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. R. Khalid, V. J. Casillas, B. M. Montalvo, R. Centeno, and J. U. Levi
Using MR Cholangiopancreatography to Evaluate Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1347 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. Irie, H. Honda, T. Kuroiwa, K. Yoshimitsu, H. Aibe, K. Shinozaki, and K. Masuda
Pitfalls in MR Cholangiopancreatographic Interpretation
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 23 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. A. Soto, O. Alvarez, F. Munera, S. M. Velez, J. Valencia, and N. Ramirez
Diagnosing Bile Duct Stones: Comparison of Unenhanced Helical CT, Oral Contrast-Enhanced CT Cholangiography, and MR Cholangiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1127 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Watanabe, M. Dohke, T. Ishimori, Y. Amoh, A. Okumura, K. Oda, T. Hayashi, A. Hiyama, and Y. Dodo
Pseudo-obstruction of the Extrahepatic Bile Duct Due to Artifact from Arterial Pulsatile Compression: A Diagnostic Pitfall of MR Cholangiopancreatography
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 856 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1999 by the Radiological Society of North America.