RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byng, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, N. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Byng, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, N. F.

RadioGraphics, Vol 18, 1587-1598, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


REVIEWS

Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms

JW Byng, MJ Yaffe, RA Jong, RS Shumak, GA Lockwood, DL Tritchler and NF Boyd
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

To evaluate the association between mammographic density and breast cancer risk, a simple, observer-assisted technique called interactive thresholding was developed that allows reliable quantitative assessment of mammographic density with use of a computer workstation. Use of this technique helps confirm that mammographic density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer and is present in a large proportion of breast cancer cases. The strong relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer risk suggests that the causes of breast cancer may be better understood by identifying the factors associated with mammographically dense tissue and determining how such tissue changes as these factors vary. Furthermore, because it can be modified, mammographic density may also be a good vehicle for the development and monitoring of potential preventive strategies. Areas of ongoing investigation include evaluating a potential genetic component of mammographic density by comparing density measurements in twins and understanding changes in density relative to age, menopausal status, exogenous hormone use, and exposure to environmental carcinogens. In addition, work is ongoing to establish measurements from imaging modalities other than mammography and to relate these measurements directly to breast cancer risk.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. J. Heine, M. J. Carston, C. G. Scott, K. R. Brandt, F.-F. Wu, V. S. Pankratz, T. A. Sellers, and C. M. Vachon
An Automated Approach for Estimation of Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2008; 17(11): 3090 - 3097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Khazen, R. M.L. Warren, C. R.M. Boggis, E. C. Bryant, S. Reed, I. Warsi, L. J. Pointon, G. E. Kwan-Lim, D. Thompson, R. Eeles, et al.
A Pilot Study of Compositional Analysis of the Breast and Estimation of Breast Mammographic Density Using Three-Dimensional T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2008; 17(9): 2268 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Ding, R. Warren, I. Warsi, N. Day, D. Thompson, M. Brady, C. Tromans, R. Highnam, and D. Easton
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Using Standard Mammogram Form to Predict Breast Cancer Risk: Case-Control Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1074 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. E. Kelemen, V. S. Pankratz, T. A. Sellers, K. R. Brandt, A. Wang, C. Janney, Z. S. Fredericksen, J. R. Cerhan, and C. M. Vachon
Age-specific Trends in Mammographic Density: The Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2008; 167(9): 1027 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. J. Fuhrman, B. E. Teter, M. Barba, C. Byrne, A. Cavalleri, B. J. Grant, P. J. Horvath, D. Morelli, E. Venturelli, and P. C. Muti
Equol Status Modifies the Association of Soy Intake and Mammographic Density in a Sample of Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 33 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. Sellers, C. Vachon, V. Pankratz, C. Janney, Z Fredericksen, K. Brandt, Y Huang, F. Couch, L. Kushi, and J. Cerhan
Association of Childhood and Adolescent Anthropometric Factors, Physical Activity, and Diet with Adult Mammographic Breast Density
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2007; 166(4): 456 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Stone, G. S. Dite, A. Gunasekara, D. R. English, M. R.E McCredie, G. G. Giles, J. N. Cawson, R. A. Hegele, A. M. Chiarelli, M. J. Yaffe, et al.
The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 612 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. S. Dite, J. D. Wark, G. G. Giles, D. R. English, M. R.E. McCredie, and J. L. Hopper
Is There Overlap Between the Genetic Determinants of Mammographic Density and Bone Mineral Density?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2266 - 2268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. R. Cerhan, T. A. Sellers, C. A. Janney, V. S. Pankratz, K. R. Brandt, and C. M. Vachon
Prenatal and Perinatal Correlates of Adult Mammographic Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1502 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Cuzick, J. Warwick, E. Pinney, R. M. L. Warren, and S. W. Duffy
Tamoxifen and Breast Density in Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 21, 2004; 96(8): 621 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Jamal, K.-H. Ng, D. McLean, L.-M. Looi, and F. Moosa
Mammographic Breast Glandularity in Malaysian Women: Data Derived from Radiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2004; 182(3): 713 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg
Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. M. Vachon, T. A. Sellers, V. S. Pankratz, F. M. Hall, N. F. Boyd, J. L. Hopper, and E. Thurfjell
Mammographic Density of the Breast
N. Engl. J. Med., January 9, 2003; 348(2): 174 - 175.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. F. Boyd, G. S. Dite, J. Stone, A. Gunasekara, D. R. English, M. R.E. McCredie, G. G. Giles, D. Tritchler, A. Chiarelli, M. J. Yaffe, et al.
Heritability of Mammographic Density, a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., September 19, 2002; 347(12): 886 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. M. Hall, L. A. Venta, and R. E. Hendrick
Mammographic Density Categories
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2002; 178(1): 242 - 243.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Freedman, J. S. Martin, J. O'Gorman, S. Eckert, M. E. Lippman, S.-C. B. Lo, E. L. Walls, and J. Zeng
Digitized Mammography: a Clinical Trial of Postmenopausal Women Randomly Assigned to Receive Raloxifene, Estrogen, or Placebo
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 3, 2001; 93(1): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Yoshidome, M.-A. Shibata, C. Couldrey, K. S. Korach, and J. E. Green
Estrogen Promotes Mammary Tumor Development in C3(1)/SV40 Large T-Antigen Transgenic Mice: Paradoxical Loss of Estrogen Receptor{{alpha}} Expression during Tumor Progression
Cancer Res., December 1, 2000; 60(24): 6901 - 6910.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. K. Chow, D. Venzon, E. C. Jones, A. Premkumar, J. O’Shaughnessy, and J. Zujewski
Effect of Tamoxifen on Mammographic Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 917 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. Friedenreich, H. Bryant, F Alexander, J Hugh, J Danyluk, and D. Page
Risk factors for benign proliferative breast disease
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2000; 29(4): 637 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.