|
|
||||||||
RadioGraphics, Vol 18, 1465-1480, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America
REVIEWS |
EK Outwater, R Blasbalg, ES Siegelman and M Vala
Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5244, USA.
T1-weighted gradient-echo magnetic resonance images can be acquired with an echo time such that water and lipid spins are in phase or opposed phase. Observation of relative loss of signal intensity on opposed-phase images compared with that on in-phase images allows qualitative assessment of relatively small amounts of lipid in tissues. Conversely, frequency-selective fat saturation techniques are useful primarily for identifying predominantly fatty masses such as angiomyolipomas. Both in-phase and opposed-phase images should be acquired with similar parameters because unequivocal identification of lipid requires comparison with in-phase images to control for T1 and T2* effects. Opposed-phase imaging has been used to differentiate adrenal adenomas, which contain lipid, from adrenal metastases, which do not. The technique can be expanded to examine a spectrum of intraabdominal tumors and conditions that are characterized by intracellular lipid. These include hepatic steatosis, hepatocellular neoplasms, myelolipoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, angiomyolipoma, and renal cell carcinoma. In liver masses, the presence of lipid is largely restricted to primary hepatocellular tumors. Renal and adrenal masses may contain focal fat (angiomyolipomas and myelolipomas, respectively) or diffuse lipid (clear cell renal carcinomas and adenomas, respectively).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kitajima, Y. Kaji, K. Imanaka, R. Sugihara, and K. Sugimura MRI Findings of Uterine Lipoleiomyoma Correlated with Pathologic Findings Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W100 - W104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. A. Westphalen, A. Qayyum, B. M. Yeh, R. B. Merriman, J. A. Lee, A. Lamba, Y. Lu, and F. V. Coakley Liver Fat: Effect of Hepatic Iron Deposition on Evaluation with Opposed-Phase MR Imaging Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Rosen and M. D. Schnall Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Tumor Vascularity and Vascular Effects of Targeted Therapies in Renal Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 770s - 776s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Merkle and R. C. Nelson Dual Gradient-Echo In-Phase and Opposed-Phase Hepatic MR Imaging: A Useful Tool for Evaluating More Than Fatty Infiltration or Fatty Sparing RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1409 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Chang, B. Taouli, N. Salibi, E. M. Hecht, D. G. Chin, and V. S. Lee Opposed-phase MRI for fat quantification in fat-water phantoms with 1H MR spectroscopy to resolve ambiguity of fat or water dominance. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): W103 - W106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Israel, N. Hindman, E. Hecht, and G. Krinsky The Use of Opposed-Phase Chemical Shift MRI in the Diagnosis of Renal Angiomyolipomas Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1868 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Markmann, M. Rosen, E. S. Siegelman, M. C. Soulen, S. Deng, C. F. Barker, and A. Naji Magnetic Resonance-Defined Periportal Steatosis Following Intraportal Islet Transplantation: A Functional Footprint of Islet Graft Survival? Diabetes, July 1, 2003; 52(7): 1591 - 1594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOGRAPHICS | RADIOLOGY | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |