RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphey, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Temple, H. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphey, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Temple, H. T.

RadioGraphics, Vol 18, 1213-1237, Copyright © 1998 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features

MD Murphey, DJ Flemming, SR Boyea, JA Bojescul, DE Sweet and HT Temple
Department of Radiologic Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 20306-6000, USA.

Distinction of enchondroma versus intramedullary chondrosarcoma affecting the appendicular skeleton (proximal to the metacarpals and metatarsals) is a frequent diagnostic dilemma. The authors studied a large series of patients with these lesions (92 with enchondromas, 95 with chondrosarcomas) using statistical assessment of both clinical parameters and numerous radiologic manifestations on images from multiple modalities to identify differentiating features. Multiple clinical and imaging parameters demonstrated statistically significant differences between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma, particularly pain related to the lesion, deep endosteal scalloping (greater than two- thirds of cortical thickness), cortical destruction and soft-tissue mass (at computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), periosteal reaction (at radiography), and marked uptake of radionuclide (greater than the anterior iliac crest) at bone scintigraphy. All of these features strongly suggested the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma. These criteria allow distinction of appendicular enchondroma and chondrosarcoma in at least 90% of cases.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. J. Walden, M. D. Murphey, and J. A. Vidal
Incidental Enchondromas of the Knee
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1611 - 1615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. T. Miller
Bone Tumors and Tumorlike Conditions: Analysis with Conventional Radiography
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 662 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Taori, P Patil, V Attarde, S Chandanshive, V Rangankar, and N Rewatkar
Primary retroperitoneal extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: a computed tomography diagnosis
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): e268 - e270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
the Skeletal Lesions Interobserver Correlation amo
Reliability of Histopathologic and Radiologic Grading of Cartilaginous Neoplasms in Long Bones
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(10): 2113 - 2123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. Taori, S. Chandanshive, V. Attarde, P. Patil, V. Rangankar, and S. Londhe
Nasal Chondrosarcoma in an Infant: Radiologic and Histologic Correlation
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1394 - 1395.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. K. Potter, B. A. Freedman, R. A. Lehman Jr., S. B. Shawen, T. R. Kuklo, and M. D. Murphey
Solitary Epiphyseal Enchondromas
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1551 - 1560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. D. Murphey, J. S. Jelinek, H. T. Temple, D. J. Flemming, and F. H. Gannon
Imaging of Periosteal Osteosarcoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Comparison
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 129 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
P O'Donnell and P O'Donnell
Evaluation of focal bone lesions: basic principles and clinical scenarios
Imaging, December 1, 2003; 15(4): 298 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. D. Murphey, E. A. Walker, A. J. Wilson, M. J. Kransdorf, H. T. Temple, and F. H. Gannon
From the Archives of the AFIP: Imaging of Primary Chondrosarcoma: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 1245 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
W.-J. Shih, B. Mitchell, S. Magoun, and B. Wierzbinski
Localization of 99mTc HMDP in an Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma: A Case Report
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2001; 29(2): 84 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1998 by the Radiological Society of North America.