RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dony, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Haykin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dony, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Haykin, S.

RadioGraphics, Vol 16, 1481-1488, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Compression of digital chest radiographs with a mixture of principal components neural network: evaluation of performance

RD Dony, CL Coblentz, C Nabmias and S Haykin
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

The performance of a new, neural network-based image compression method was evaluated on digital radiographs for use in an educational environment. The network uses a mixture of principal components (MPC) representation to effect optimally adaptive transform coding of an image and has significant computational advantages over other techniques. Nine representative digital chest radiographs were compressed 10:1, 20:1, 30:1, and 40:1 with the MPC method. The five versions of each image, including the original, were shown simultaneously, in random order, to each of seven radiologists, who rated each one on a five-point scale for image quality and visibility of pathologic conditions. One radiologist also ranked four versions of each of the nine images in terms of the severity of distortion: The four versions represented 30:1 and 40:1 compression with the MPC method and with the classic Karhunen-Loeve transform (KLT). Only for the images compressed 40:1 with the MPC method were there any unacceptable ratings. Nevertheless, the images compressed 40:1 received a top score in 26%-33% of the evaluations. Images compressed with the MPC method were rated better than or as good as images compressed with the KLT technique 17 of 18 times. Four of nine times, images compressed 40:1 with the MPC method were rated as good as or better than images compressed 30:1 with the KLT technique.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.