RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Green, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parmley, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Green, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parmley, T. H.

RadioGraphics, Vol 16, 1371-1384, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Gestational trophoblastic disease: a spectrum of radiologic diagnosis

CL Green, TL Angtuaco, HR Shah and TH Parmley
Department of Radiology (Slot 556), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205, USA.

Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) encompasses a broad spectrum of conditions that includes hydatidiform mole, invasive mole, and choriocarcinoma. Although ultrasound (US) is the examination of choice for initial diagnosis, plain radiography, angiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging all play a role in determining the presence of GTD and the extent of its complications. US shows molar gestations as alternating cystic and solid tissue that fills the entire uterus. CT and MR imaging are useful in detecting myometrial invasion, parametrial extension, and metastasis. Because each imaging technique offers a unique perspective highlighting different aspects of GTD, it is important to understand the pathophysiology and natural history of the disease. Such knowledge in turn leads to a greater understanding of the spectrum of findings seen on various kinds of radiologic images and enables the radiologist to play an important role in directing patient work-up by recognizing the implications of various findings and guiding management decisions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Ultrasound MedHome page
C. Betel, M. Atri, A.-M. Arenson, M. Khalifa, R. Osborne, and G. Tomlinson
Sonographic Diagnosis of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease and Comparison With Retained Products of Conception.
J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2006; 25(8): 985 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Ultrasound MedHome page
Q. Zhou, X.-Y. Lei, Q. Xie, and J. D. Cardoza
Sonographic and Doppler Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: A 12-Year Experience
J. Ultrasound Med., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 15 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
J. R. Leyendecker, V. Gorengaut, and J. J. Brown
MR Imaging of Maternal Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis during Pregnancy and the Immediate Postpartum Period
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2004; 24(5): 1301 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Nagayama, Y. Watanabe, A. Okumura, Y. Amoh, S. Nakashita, and Y. Dodo
Fast MR Imaging in Obstetrics
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2002; 22(3): 563 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. M. Vitellas, W. F. Bennett, and J. G. Bova
Case 2: Placental Site Trophoblastic Tumor
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2000; 175(3): 898- - 900.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.