RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nunez, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Becerra, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nunez, D. B., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Becerra, J. L.

RadioGraphics, Vol 16, 1307-1318, Copyright © 1996 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Cervical spine trauma: how much more do we learn by routinely using helical CT?

DB Nunez Jr, A Zuluaga, DA Fuentes-Bernardo, LA Rivas and JL Becerra
Department of Radiology (R-109), Jackson Memorial Hospital, University of Miami School of Medicine, FL 33101, USA.

Assessment of suspected cervical spine injuries remains a major debate in trauma care. It is generally accepted that many fractures are missed or incompletely shown at radiography, mainly because of suboptimal studies obtained in obtunded, uncooperative trauma victims. In a series of 88 severely traumatized patients, the authors retrospectively determined the type, distribution, and significance of such missed lesions. This assessment was made by comparing radiographs and helical computed tomographic (CT) scans of the cervical spine and reviewing medical records in these cases. Of the 88 patients, 32 patients had cervical spine fractures (n = 50) that were not revealed or were incompletely demonstrated at radiography. Most missed fractures occurred at the C-1 to C-2 and C-6 to C-7 levels, and most involved the transverse processes and the posterolateral elements of the vertebrae. One-third of the patients with missed fractures had either clinically significant or unstable injuries, as determined on the basis of mechanistic or imaging criteria. Helical CT can depict significant fractures not shown by plain radiography and should be added routinely to the initial screening for cervical spine fractures in polytrauma victims.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P.M. Phal, L.P. Riccelli, P. Wang, G.M. Nesbit, and J.C. Anderson
Fracture Detection in the Cervical Spine with Multidetector CT: 1-mm versus 3-mm Axial Images
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1446 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. C. Lucey, J. W. Stuhlfaut, A. R. Hochberg, J. C. Varghese, and J. A. Soto
Evaluation of Blunt Abdominal Trauma Using PACS-Based 2D and 3D MDCT Reformations of the Lumbar Spine and Pelvis
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1435 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. J. Hogan, S. E. Mirvis, K. Shanmuganathan, and T. M. Scalea
Exclusion of Unstable Cervical Spine Injury in Obtunded Patients with Blunt Trauma: Is MR Imaging Needed when Multi-Detector Row CT Findings Are Normal?
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 106 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. K. Rao, C. Wasyliw, and D. B. Nunez Jr
Spectrum of Imaging Findings in Hyperextension Injuries of the Neck
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1239 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C G Morris, E P McCoy, and G G Lavery
Spinal immobilisation for unconscious patients with multiple injuries
BMJ, August 28, 2004; 329(7464): 495 - 499.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. M. Stevens, R. L. Birdwell, C. F. Beaulieu, D. M. Ikeda, and N. J. Pelc
Circular Tomosynthesis: Potential in Imaging of Breast and Upper Cervical Spine--Preliminary Phantom and in Vitro Study
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 569 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
CT Versus Radiography for Initial Evaluation of Cervical Spine Trauma: What Is the Standard of Care?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 911 - 915.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Rybicki, R. D. Nawfel, P. F. Judy, S. Ledbetter, R. L. Dyson, P. S. Halt, K. M. Shu, and D. B. Nunez Jr.
Skin and Thyroid Dosimetry in Cervical Spine Screening: Two Methods for Evaluation and a Comparison Between a Helical CT and Radiographic Trauma Series
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 933 - 937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. Munera, J. A. Soto, D. M. Palacio, J. Castaneda, C. Morales, A. Sanabria, J. E. Gutierrez, and G. Garcia
Penetrating Neck Injuries: Helical CT Angiography for Initial Evaluation
Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 366 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. H. Daffner
Helical CT of the Cervical Spine for Trauma Patients: A Time Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2001; 177(3): 677 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. H. Daffner
Cervical Radiography for Trauma Patients: A Time-Effective Technique?
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1309 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
L. M. E. Jelly, D. R. Evans, M. J. Easty, T. J. Coats, and O. Chan
Radiography versus Spiral CT in the Evaluation of Cervicothoracic Junction Injuries in Polytrauma Patients Who Have Undergone Intubation
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2000; 20(90001): 251S - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1996 by the Radiological Society of North America.